On Constructive Models of Theories with Linear Rudin-Keisler Ordering

Report 1 Downloads 64 Views
On Constructive Models of Theories with Linear Rudin-Keisler Ordering

Alexander N. Gavryushkin

[email protected]

Novosibirsk State University

Denition A model A is said to be decidable if the set {ϕ( 0 , . . . , n ) | A |= ϕ( 0 , . . . , n )} is computable. a

a

a

a

Denition A model A is said to be decidable if the set {ϕ( 0 , . . . , n ) | A |= ϕ( 0 , . . . , n )} is computable. a

a

a

a

Denition A model A is said to be computable if its domain, functions and predicates are uniformly computable.

Denition A model A is said to be decidable if the set {ϕ( 0 , . . . , n ) | A |= ϕ( 0 , . . . , n )} is computable. a

a

a

a

Denition A model A is said to be computable if its domain, functions and predicates are uniformly computable. Denition A model A has computable presentation (is said to be computably presentable) if it is isomorphic to a computable model.

Let be a countable complete theory. Denote by ω( ) the number of countable models of up to isomorphism. T

T

T

Let be a countable complete theory. Denote by ω( ) the number of countable models of up to isomorphism. Denition A theory is said to be Ehrenfeucht theory if 3 6 ω( ) < ω. T

T

T

T

T

Let be a countable complete theory. Denote by ω( ) the number of countable models of up to isomorphism. Denition A theory is said to be Ehrenfeucht theory if 3 6 ω( ) < ω. T

T

T

T

T

Denition A model M |= is quasi-prime if it is prime over some realization of some type of the theory . T

T

Let be a countable complete theory. Denote by ω( ) the number of countable models of up to isomorphism. Denition A theory is said to be Ehrenfeucht theory if 3 6 ω( ) < ω. T

T

T

T

T

Denition A model M |= is quasi-prime if it is prime over some realization of some type of the theory . Denote by Mp the set of all (isomorphic) prime models over realizations of , i. e. T

T

p

is a prime model of where M |= ( )}.

Mp = {Ma | hMa , ai

p a

Th

(M, a),

Denition A type does not exceed a type under the Rudin-Keisler pre-order ( is dominated by ) if Mq |= . Written 6RK . ∼RK ⇔ ( 6RK & 6RK ). Mp 6RK Mq ⇔ 6RK . p

q

p

p

q

q

p

q

p

q

q

p

p

p

q

Denition A type does not exceed a type under the Rudin-Keisler pre-order ( is dominated by ) if Mq |= . Written 6RK . ∼RK ⇔ ( 6RK & 6RK ). Mp 6RK Mq ⇔ 6RK . p

q

p

p

q

q

p

q

q

p

Mq |= p ⇔ Mp  Mq

q

.

p

p

p

q

Denition A type does not exceed a type under the Rudin-Keisler pre-order ( is dominated by ) if Mq |= . Written 6RK . ∼RK ⇔ ( 6RK & 6RK ). Mp 6RK Mq ⇔ 6RK . p

q

p

p

q

q

p

q

q

p

Mq |= p ⇔ Mp  Mq

p

p

p

q

.

Denote by ( ) the set of all types (over ∅) consistent with the theory . S T

T

q

Denition A type does not exceed a type under the Rudin-Keisler pre-order ( is dominated by ) if Mq |= . Written 6RK . ∼RK ⇔ ( 6RK & 6RK ). Mp 6RK Mq ⇔ 6RK . p

q

p

p

q

q

p

q

q

p

p

p

p

q

Mq |= p ⇔ Mp  Mq

.

Denote by ( ) the set of all types (over ∅) consistent with the theory . S T

T

Denote by ( ) the set of all types of isomorphism of Mp , throughout all ∈ ( ). This set is pre-ordered by the relation 6RK . RK T p

S T

q

Denition A type of a theory is said to be powerful in the theory T if every model M of T, realizing , also realizes every type from ( ). p

T

p

S T

Denition A type of a theory is said to be powerful in the theory T if every model M of T, realizing , also realizes every type from ( ). p

T

p

S T

Denition A model sequence M0  M1  . . . is said to be elementary chain over a type if Mn ∼ = Mp , for every ∈ ω . p

n

Denition A type of a theory is said to be powerful in the theory T if every model M of T, realizing , also realizes every type from ( ). p

T

p

S T

Denition A model sequence M0  M1  . . . is said to be elementary chain over a type if Mn ∼ = Mp , for every ∈ ω . p

n

Denition A model M is said to be limit over a type if M = S Mn , for n∈ω some elementary chain (Mn )n∈ω over , and M 6∼= Mp . p

p

Lemma (S. Sudoplatov) Every model of an Ehrenfeucht theory either quasi-prime or limit.

Lemma (S. Sudoplatov) Every model of an Ehrenfeucht theory either quasi-prime or limit.

Consider e ∈ ( )/ ∼RK . Let e = {Mp0 , . . . , Mpn }. Denote by ( e ) the number of two by two non-isomorphic models each of which is limit over some type i . M

M

RK T

IL M

p

Lemma (S. Sudoplatov) Every model of an Ehrenfeucht theory either quasi-prime or limit.

Consider e ∈ ( )/ ∼RK . Let e = {Mp0 , . . . , Mpn }. Denote by ( e ) the number of two by two non-isomorphic models each of which is limit over some type i . Theorem (S. Sudoplatov) M

M

RK T

IL M

p

The following conditions are equivalent:

1

ω(T ) < ω ;

2

|S (T )| = ω , |RK (T )| < ω , e ∈ RK (T )/ ∼RK . M

( e ) < ω,

IL M

for any

Denition Let h ; 6i is nite pre-ordered set with the least element 0 and the greatest class en in ordered factor-set h ; 6i/∼ (where ∼ ⇔ 6 and 6 ), e0 6= en . Let : /∼ → ω is a function, satisfying next properties (e0) = 0, (en ) > 0, (e) > 0, when |e| > 1. The pair ( , ) is said to be e-parameters. At that, the set is said to be the rst e-parameter and the function  the second e-parameter. X

x

x

x

y

x

y

X

y

x

x

x

f

y

X

X

f

x

X f

x

f

y

f

f

Denition Let h ; 6i is nite pre-ordered set with the least element 0 and the greatest class en in ordered factor-set h ; 6i/∼ (where ∼ ⇔ 6 and 6 ), e0 6= en . Let : /∼ → ω is a function, satisfying next properties (e0) = 0, (en ) > 0, (e) > 0, when |e| > 1. The pair ( , ) is said to be e-parameters. At that, the set is said to be the rst e-parameter and the function  the second e-parameter. X

x

x

x

y

x

y

X

y

x

x

x

f

y

X

f

x

X f

x

f

y

f

X

f

Denition A theory is said to be Ehrenfeucht theory with e-parameters ( , ) if there exists an isomorphism ϕ : → ( ) and for any e ∈ / ∼, an equality (ϕ(e)) = (e) holds. T

X

x

f

X

X

IL

x

f

x

RK T

Let be an Ehrenfeucht theory with e-parameters ( T

X

,f )

.

Let be an Ehrenfeucht theory with e-parameters ( Denition T

X

,f )

.

Spectrum of decidable models of Ehrenfeucht theory SDM(T )

is a pair ( , ), where = { ∈ | element corresponds to a decidable model of the theory } (corresponds  in terms of isomorphism ϕ form previous denition); δ = δ (δ is domain of a function), ( ( ) = ⇔ there exist exactly decidable limit non-isomorphic models of over the model, corresponding to ). Y

g

Y

x

X

x

T

f

g x

m

g

m

T

x

Let be an Ehrenfeucht theory with e-parameters ( Denition T

X

,f )

.

Spectrum of decidable models of Ehrenfeucht theory SDM(T )

is a pair ( , ), where = { ∈ | element corresponds to a decidable model of the theory } (corresponds  in terms of isomorphism ϕ form previous denition); δ = δ (δ is domain of a function), ( ( ) = ⇔ there exist exactly decidable limit non-isomorphic models of over the model, corresponding to ). Y

g

Y

x

X

x

T

f

g x

m

g

m

T

x

Denition

Spectrum of computable models of Ehrenfeucht theory

is a pair ( , ), where = { ∈ | element corresponds to a computable model of the theory }; δ = δ , ( ( ) = ⇔ there exist exactly computable limit non-isomorphic models of over the model, corresponding to ).

SCM(T )

Y

g

Y

x

X

x

T

g x

m

f

g

m

T

x

Problem Describe sets theory T .

SDM(T )

and

SCM(T )

for arbitrary Ehrenfeucht

Denote by

a linear ordered set, composed of 1 < . . . < n }.

{x0 < x

L

n

x

n

+

1 elements:

Denote by

a linear ordered set, composed of { 0 < 1 < . . . < n }. Theorem 16 ∈ω x

Let

x

L

n

n

+

1 elements:

x

n

n

theory T

. There exists hereditary decidable Ehrenfeucht

( n) ∼ = Ln

for which RK T

holds.

Denote by

a linear ordered set, composed of { 0 < 1 < . . . < n }. Theorem 16 ∈ω x

Let

L

n

x

n

+

1 elements:

x

n

n

theory T

. There exists hereditary decidable Ehrenfeucht

( n) ∼ = Ln

for which RK T

Theorem 16

0

holds.

∈ ω , 6 k 6 n. There exists Ehrenfeucht theory Tn ( n) ∼ = Ln holds. At that, models, corresponding to elements x0 , x1 , . . . , xk from Ln , are decidable, models, corresponding to elements xk +1 , . . . , xn , have no computable

Let

n

which RK T

presentations.

for

Theorem 16

m ∈ ω , there exists Ehrenfeucht theory Tm , such that ( m) ∼ = Lm , every quasi-prime model of Tm is not computably

For all RK T

m.

presentable and there exists computably presentable model of T

Theorem 16

m ∈ ω , there exists Ehrenfeucht theory Tm , such that ( m) ∼ = Lm , every quasi-prime model of Tm is not computably

For all RK T

m.

presentable and there exists computably presentable model of T

Corollary 16

m ∈ ω , there exists Ehrenfeucht theory Tm , ∼ RK (Tm ) = Lm , such that a model M |= Tm have computable presentation if and only if M is limit model over powerful type For all

m

the theory T

.

of

Theorem 16

m ∈ ω , there exists Ehrenfeucht theory Tm , such that ( m) ∼ = Lm , every quasi-prime model of Tm is not computably

For all RK T

m.

presentable and there exists computably presentable model of T

Corollary 16

m ∈ ω , there exists Ehrenfeucht theory Tm , ∼ RK (Tm ) = Lm , such that a model M |= Tm have computable presentation if and only if M is limit model over powerful type For all

m

the theory T

of

.

Corollary 16

m ∈ ω , there exists Ehrenfeucht theory Tm , ∼ RK (Tm ) = Lm , such that every quasi-prime model of Tm For all

m,

computable presentation, every limit model of T computable presentation.

have

have no

Thank you for attention!