PORTFOLIO of DESIGN WORKS
PORTFOLIO of DESIGN WORKS by Dimitry Alexander Demin
ACaDEmY of ARCHITECTuRE and ARTS
pORTFOLIO
State Academy of Architecture and Arts, Rostov na Donu/Russia
My interests in architecture had begun with trying to justify beauty by looking at nature. I started my studies in 1999 at the University of Architectire and Fine Art of Rotov(Russia). During this time I had a great interest in juxtaposition of mathematics, geometrical proportion, colors and the architectural history. In order to come up with new design idea, first I learned classical methods of sketching and paintings[001], in which I learned to get a feeling for form, colors and proportion. Experience I gathered while doing research about costructivists[002] greatly influenced my design works afterwoods.
1998-2000 School of Fine Art of Rostow. Paintings exemplifying study of feeling for shape, ligth and proporiton.
2
pORTFOLIO
State Academy of Architecture and Arts, Rostov na Donu/Russia
Pictures from research paper ”Beyond the October Revolution”. Theme was about the changes experienced in architecture towards one based on social concepts and processess driven by scientific knowledge . Paper was based on works of El Lissitzky, Ivan Leonidov, Vladimir Shuchov, Iakov Chernikhov, Wladimir Tatlin works.
My bachelor diploma “ROSSELMASH Head Office “(p.4) was focused on the developement of a new kind of office building, which would allow a flexible use while Russia entered a new area of economical and technical progress. During the design process I concentrated on combining the precision enabled by 3D softwares for digital representation and significant design technics from the constructivists. 3
pORTFOLIO
State Academy of Architecture and Arts, Rostov on Don/Russia
ROSSELMASH Head Office Bachelor Diploma [2004] by Professor Nikolay N. Titomirov The design of this urban quarter is based on the landmarks of constructivist’s buildings put together with exploration of geometrical possibilities in 3D Software.
4
BauHauS UNIvERSITY
pORTFOLIO
Bauhaus University of Weimar, Germany
Autobahnmuseum[2005] by Dr. J.H. Gleiter After completing my Bachelor degree in 2004, I continued my education at Bauhaus University in Weimar(Germany). I was mainly attracted by modernism and the newest technologies. In autum 2005 together with my colleague J.Gaun we designed a small museum for the german “Autobahn“. The form here is based on a principle of deformation that follows function. I wrote an algorhitm in MaxScript that makes geometrical transformations of the building possible. During the work on this project I discovered the book of Lars Spybroeck “Machining Architecture“. Next semester I moved to Kassel(Germany) in order to study it deeper.
5
UNIvERSITY OF KaSSEL
pORTFOLIO
2006-2007
STEEL and FREEDOM Dancing Tower [2006] by Professor Lars Spuybroek Dancing Tower is an example of application of “Machining architecture” tools. The researches in form-generation were promoted by Spuybroek. The basic structural principle of the skyscraper is based on the gothik principle of branching.
6
pORTFOLIO
2006-2007
First part of the design was a research on gothic ornamentic structures and their translation into the language of NURBs. Next step was a shift towards a structural system from a curve clustering into a set of nodes constituting the building. The next step was an act of convergence, which consisted in saving and using information contained in a diagram of dancers. I applied the movement of dancing people to design the skyscraper. Lastly was a divergent phase - I mobilized the systems onto the skyscraper, where the dancing diagram became a generative building. I was using MEL for the simulation of the dancing diagram.
7
pORTFOLIO
2006-2007
Parametric area moduls Digital Stones [2007] by Oliver Tessmann, Markus Schein In spring 2007 Oliver Tessmann and Markus Schein offered a seminar for students who were interested in getting better knowledge in RhinoScript and digital production. The aim was to design a parametrical module and bring it to production. The results of our works were published in the book “Parametrische Flächenmodule” by Tessmann and Schein.
8
[ 36 - 37 ]
pORTFOLIO
2006-2007
TENSEGRITY Die Umleitung der Gravitation by Professor Frank Stepper The twentiest century experienced a global shift towards the understanding of tensional structures, that is to say the substitution of compression elements by tension elements - the beginning of a suspended architecture. Tensegrity was a big part of it, unfortunately the process did not lead to any major architectural path. My work was aimed at researching possible ways to apply tensegrity to architecture.
9
pORTFOLIO
2006-2007
Skyscraper structures based on mathematical area systems Diplom II [2007] by Professor Dipl.-Ing. Manfred Grohmann, Dipl.-Ing. Mirco Becker, Dipl.-Ing. Oliver Tessmann, Dipl.-Ing. Christian Troche In my diploma I felt inspired by the beauty of mathematical surfaces, meanwhile paying attention to functional, constructive and historical principles of high-rise buildings. I designed a plugin for Rhino which allowed thousand possible configurations of different skyscrapers following the principal of minimal surfaces in both symmetrical and asymmetrical ways.
10
pORTFOLIO
2006-2007
11
M /
pORTFOLIO
2007-2009 BOLLINGER + GROHMANN
schneider+schumacher
Frankfur t am Main / Deutschland
I n g e n i e u r e
BT 3 A
BT 3 B
BT 3 C
BT 3 D
BT 3 E
BT 1,2,3 F
BT 3 G
BT 3 H
BT 4 D
BT 1,2 D
BT 1,2 E
BT 1,2,3 F
BT 1,2 G
BT 1,2 H
BT 2 B
BT 2 C
1 FINISH /CLEAR 2 3 4 /COM, Structural 5 /UNITS,SI ! [m,N,s,kg] 6 7 8 ! ---- vordefinierte Variablen 9 10 E_Beton =34300000000 11 NU_Beton =0.2 12 Dichte_Beton1 =0 13 Dichte_Beton2 =2500 14 D1=0.3 15 D2=0.3 16 17 18 /PREP7 19 20 ! Elementdefinition 21 ET,1,SHELL63 22 23 ! Querschnittsdefinition 24 R,1,D1,D1,D1,D1, , , 25 R,2,D2,D2,D2,D2, , , 26 27 ! Materialeigenschaften 28 MPTEMP,1,0 29 MPDATA,EX,1,,E_Beton 30 MPDATA,EX,2,,E_Beton 31 MPDATA,EX,3,,E_Beton 32 MPDATA,PRXY,1,,NU_Beton 33 MPDATA,PRXY,2,,NU_Beton 34 MPDATA,PRXY,3,,NU_Beton 35 MPTEMP,,,,,,,, 36 MPTEMP ,1,0 37 MPDATA,DENS,1,,Dichte_Beton1 38 MPDATA,DENS,2,,Dichte_Beton2 39 MPDATA,DENS,3,,Dichte_Beton1 40 41 !Definition der Knotenkorrdinaten 42 KN1=13 43 KN2=12.6 44 KN3=11.1 45 46 K,1,-KN1,KN1,0 47 K,2,-KN2,KN1,0 48 K,3,-KN3,KN1,0 49 K,4,KN3,KN1,0 50 K,5,KN2,KN1,0 51 K,6,KN1,KN1,0 52 K,7,-KN1,KN2,0 53 K,8,-KN2,KN2,0 54 K,9,-KN3,KN2,0 55 K,10,KN3,KN2,0 56 K,11,KN2,KN2,0 57 K,12,KN1,KN2,0 58 K,13,-KN1,KN3,0 59 K,14,-KN2,KN3,0 60 K,15,-KN3,KN3,0
I’m very thankful towards Bollinger+Grohmann for my time spent their and the experience gained in using “computer based design“ (CAD) in a framework of international projects in close collaboration with famous architekts like COOP Himmelb(l)au, Willmote&Associes SA, Schneider+Schuhmacher Architekten, ODBC ARCHITECTES and Gerber Architekten. During my work I developed new kinds of computer based design technics and focused on their integration in architectural and structural design. I concentrated on parametrical form-finding methods, algorithmical generation of structures and architectural forms, computer controlled fabrication processes - all of which belong to this emergent architectural paradigm widespread from the field of theoretical research unto new design niches. The potential of computer based methods reaches far more out than just the automation of given design technics. It reshuffles the relation and collaboration between architect and engineer. I believe that they must still keep their distinction and expand in parallel thanks to these new tools. My focus was always on exploring new possibilities and following a strict set of rules.
12
M /
2007-2009 schneider+schum acher
pORTFOLIO
Frankfur t am Main / Deutschland
BOLLINGER + GROHMANN I n g e n i e u r e
BT 3 A
BT 3 B
BT 3 C
BT 3 D
BT 3 E
BT 1,2,3 F
BT 3 G
BT 3 H
Odile DECQ Benoit CORNETTE ARCHITECTES - URBANISTES DPLG
BT 4 D
BT 1,2 D
BT 1,2 E
BT 1,2,3 F
BT 1,2 G
BT 1,2 H
BT 2 B
BT 2 C
1 FINISH /CLEAR 2 3 4 /COM, Structural 5 /UNITS,SI ! [m,N,s,kg] 6 7 8 ! ---- vordefinierte Variablen 9 10 E_Beton =34300000000 11 NU_Beton =0.2 12 Dichte_Beton1 =0 13 Dichte_Beton2 =2500 14 D1=0.3 15 D2=0.3 16 17 18 /PREP7 19 20 ! Elementdefinition 21 ET,1,SHELL63 22 23 ! Querschnittsdefinition 24 R,1,D1,D1,D1,D1, , , 25 R,2,D2,D2,D2,D2, , , 26 27 ! Materialeigenschaften 28 MPTEMP,1,0 29 MPDATA,EX,1,,E_Beton 30 MPDATA,EX,2,,E_Beton 31 MPDATA,EX,3,,E_Beton 32 MPDATA,PRXY,1,,NU_Beton 33 MPDATA,PRXY,2,,NU_Beton 34 MPDATA,PRXY,3,,NU_Beton 35 MPTEMP,,,,,,,, 36 MPTEMP ,1,0 37 MPDATA,DENS,1,,Dichte_Beton1 38 MPDATA,DENS,2,,Dichte_Beton2 39 MPDATA,DENS,3,,Dichte_Beton1 40 41 !Definition der Knotenkorrdinaten 42 KN1=13 43 KN2=12.6 44 KN3=11.1 45 46 K,1,-KN1,KN1,0 47 K,2,-KN2,KN1,0 48 K,3,-KN3,KN1,0 49 K,4,KN3,KN1,0 50 K,5,KN2,KN1,0 51 K,6,KN1,KN1,0 52 K,7,-KN1,KN2,0 53 K,8,-KN2,KN2,0 54 K,9,-KN3,KN2,0 55 K,10,KN3,KN2,0 56 K,11,KN2,KN2,0 57 K,12,KN1,KN2,0 58 K,13,-KN1,KN3,0 59 K,14,-KN2,KN3,0 60 K,15,-KN3,KN3,0
isoCurves in anology with the Sphere with Longitude and Latitude
GARE MARITIME DE TANGER MED Tanger[2008] The shape of ODBCA’s building in Tanger is defined by an irregular three-dimensional freeform, with tree different layers inside. The special ODBCA’s design would be more or less impossible throug a traditional approach. The implementation of a parametric 3D-Model for the building’s geometry helped to find new structural design solution - by changing the location of the beams for example. This model was used for the coordination of subsequent planning steps and to assess the influence of further design settings.
13
[06] [04]
[6]_analysis of maximal radius of surface-01 2007-2009 BOLLINGER + GROHMANN [7]_analysis surface-01 s cof h nmaximal e i d e r radius + s c hof um acher I n g e n i e u r e
BT 3 A
BT 3 B
BT 3 C
BT 3 D
BT 3 E
BT 1,2,3 F
BT 3 G
BT 3 H
curvature pORTFOLIO analysis of 01-surface showed, that it‘ll be M / Frankfur t am Main / Deutschland nroll the surface. 5] shos an unrollable surface like a cilindrical surface.
Odile the DECQ Benoit CORNETTE ARCHITECTES - URBANISTES basicaly values of minimal and maximal radius showed the true pos- DPLG sibilities of later paneling of surfases. In few words: the fidelity construction form directly depends on the quality of the 3d surfaces
BT 4 D
[05]
[06] BT 1,2 D
BT 1,2 E
BT 1,2,3 F
BT 1,2 G
BT 1,2 H
BT 2 B
BT 2 C
6]_analysis of maximal radius of surface-01 7]_analysis of maximal radius of surface-01
1 FINISH /CLEAR 2 3 4 /COM, Structural 5 /UNITS,SI ! [m,N,s,kg] 6 7 8 ! ---- vordefinierte Variablen 9 10 E_Beton =34300000000 11 NU_Beton =0.2 12 Dichte_Beton1 =0 13 Dichte_Beton2 =2500 14 D1=0.3 15 D2=0.3 16 17 18 /PREP7 19 20 ! Elementdefinition 21 ET,1,SHELL63 22 23 ! Querschnittsdefinition 24 R,1,D1,D1,D1,D1, , , 25 R,2,D2,D2,D2,D2, , , 26 27 ! Materialeigenschaften 28 MPTEMP,1,0 29 MPDATA,EX,1,,E_Beton 30 MPDATA,EX,2,,E_Beton 31 MPDATA,EX,3,,E_Beton 32 MPDATA,PRXY,1,,NU_Beton 33 MPDATA,PRXY,2,,NU_Beton 34 MPDATA,PRXY,3,,NU_Beton 35 MPTEMP,,,,,,,, 36 MPTEMP ,1,0 37 MPDATA,DENS,1,,Dichte_Beton1 38 MPDATA,DENS,2,,Dichte_Beton2 39 MPDATA,DENS,3,,Dichte_Beton1 40 41 !Definition der Knotenkorrdinaten 42 KN1=13 43 KN2=12.6 44 KN3=11.1 45 46 K,1,-KN1,KN1,0 47 K,2,-KN2,KN1,0 48 K,3,-KN3,KN1,0 49 K,4,KN3,KN1,0 50 K,5,KN2,KN1,0 51 K,6,KN1,KN1,0 52 K,7,-KN1,KN2,0 53 K,8,-KN2,KN2,0 54 K,9,-KN3,KN2,0 55 K,10,KN3,KN2,0 56 K,11,KN2,KN2,0 57 K,12,KN1,KN2,0 58 K,13,-KN1,KN3,0 59 K,14,-KN2,KN3,0 60 K,15,-KN3,KN3,0
asicaly the values of minimal and maximal radius showed the true posibilities of later paneling of surfases. In few words: the fidelity construcon form directly depends on the quality of the 3d surfaces
[07]
[07]
14
M /
2007-2009 schneider+schum acher
pORTFOLIO
Frankfur t am Main / Deutschland
BOLLINGER + GROHMANN I n g e n i e u r e
BT 3 A
BT 3 B
BT 3 C
BT 3 D
BT 3 E
BT 1,2,3 F
BT 3 G
BT 3 H
BT 4 D
BT 1,2 D
BT 1,2 E
BT 1,2,3 F
BT 1,2 G
BT 1,2 H
BT 2 B
BT 2 C
1 FINISH /CLEAR 2 3 4 /COM, Structural 5 /UNITS,SI ! [m,N,s,kg] 6 7 8 ! ---- vordefinierte Variablen 9 10 E_Beton =34300000000 11 NU_Beton =0.2 12 Dichte_Beton1 =0 13 Dichte_Beton2 =2500 14 D1=0.3 15 D2=0.3 16 17 18 /PREP7 19 20 ! Elementdefinition 21 ET,1,SHELL63 22 23 ! Querschnittsdefinition 24 R,1,D1,D1,D1,D1, , , 25 R,2,D2,D2,D2,D2, , , 26 27 ! Materialeigenschaften 28 MPTEMP,1,0 29 MPDATA,EX,1,,E_Beton 30 MPDATA,EX,2,,E_Beton 31 MPDATA,EX,3,,E_Beton 32 MPDATA,PRXY,1,,NU_Beton 33 MPDATA,PRXY,2,,NU_Beton 34 MPDATA,PRXY,3,,NU_Beton 35 MPTEMP,,,,,,,, 36 MPTEMP ,1,0 37 MPDATA,DENS,1,,Dichte_Beton1 38 MPDATA,DENS,2,,Dichte_Beton2 39 MPDATA,DENS,3,,Dichte_Beton1 40 41 !Definition der Knotenkorrdinaten 42 KN1=13 43 KN2=12.6 44 KN3=11.1 45 46 K,1,-KN1,KN1,0 47 K,2,-KN2,KN1,0 48 K,3,-KN3,KN1,0 49 K,4,KN3,KN1,0 50 K,5,KN2,KN1,0 51 K,6,KN1,KN1,0 52 K,7,-KN1,KN2,0 53 K,8,-KN2,KN2,0 54 K,9,-KN3,KN2,0 55 K,10,KN3,KN2,0 56 K,11,KN2,KN2,0 57 K,12,KN1,KN2,0 58 K,13,-KN1,KN3,0 59 K,14,-KN2,KN3,0 60 K,15,-KN3,KN3,0
Prince Salman Science Oasis(PSSO) Riyadh, Saudi Arabia 2008 Architect: Gerber Architekten Engineers: Bollinger+Grohmann Ingenieure An automative generation process creating spatial trusses based on genetic algorithms was created by enabling data exchange between Rhino and Rstab through Visual Basic 2008 scripting. This was developed further on into a CAADCrooSS plug-in, which permitted to reduce the design process effectively by merging architectural and structural software together.
15
M /
pORTFOLIO
2007-2009 schneider+schum acher
Frankfur t am Main / Deutschland
BOLLINGER + GROHMANN I n g e n i e u r e
BT 3 A
BT 3 B
BT 3 C
BT 3 D
BT 3 E
BT 1,2,3 F
BT 3 G
BT 3 H
1 FINISH /CLEAR 2 3 4 /COM, Structural 5 /UNITS,SI ! [m,N,s,kg] 6 7 8 ! ---- vordefinierte Variablen 9 10 E_Beton =34300000000 11 NU_Beton =0.2 12 Dichte_Beton1 =0 13 Dichte_Beton2 =2500 14 D1=0.3 15 D2=0.3 16 17 18 /PREP7 19 20 ! Elementdefinition 21 ET,1,SHELL63 22 23 ! Querschnittsdefinition 24 R,1,D1,D1,D1,D1, , , 25 R,2,D2,D2,D2,D2, , , 26 27 ! Materialeigenschaften 28 MPTEMP,1,0 29 MPDATA,EX,1,,E_Beton 30 MPDATA,EX,2,,E_Beton 31 MPDATA,EX,3,,E_Beton 32 MPDATA,PRXY,1,,NU_Beton 33 MPDATA,PRXY,2,,NU_Beton 34 MPDATA,PRXY,3,,NU_Beton 35 MPTEMP,,,,,,,, 36 MPTEMP ,1,0 37 MPDATA,DENS,1,,Dichte_Beton1 38 MPDATA,DENS,2,,Dichte_Beton2 39 MPDATA,DENS,3,,Dichte_Beton1 40 41 !Definition der Knotenkorrdinaten 42 KN1=13 43 KN2=12.6 44 KN3=11.1 45 46 K,1,-KN1,KN1,0 47 K,2,-KN2,KN1,0 48 K,3,-KN3,KN1,0 49 K,4,KN3,KN1,0 50 K,5,KN2,KN1,0 51 K,6,KN1,KN1,0 52 K,7,-KN1,KN2,0 53 K,8,-KN2,KN2,0 54 K,9,-KN3,KN2,0 55 K,10,KN3,KN2,0 56 K,11,KN2,KN2,0 57 K,12,KN1,KN2,0 58 K,13,-KN1,KN3,0 59 K,14,-KN2,KN3,0 60 K,15,-KN3,KN3,0
REALISIERUNGSWETTBEWERB TORE NORD UND SÜD ME BT 4 D
BT 1,2 D
BT 1,2 E
BT 1,2,3 F
BT 1,2 G
BT 1,2 H
BT 2 B
BT 2 C
Tor Süd
North and South Gate of the Frankfort Fair Trade [2009] In close collaboration with the architect Ingo Schrader, a generative structure for three roofs was conceived for the competition “North and South Gate at the Frankfort Trade Fair”. The basic idea for the design was to realize an efficient structure with the help of an optimization algorithm, which would remind of the lightness and shape of a lotus leaf. Lightness, functionality and efficiency were the three key parameters for the generation of the structure, which despite of the way it looks is mainly based on order. 16
Tor Nord
Westhafenplatz 1, 60327 FRANKFURT AM MAIN Tel: 069/240007-34 - Fax: 069/240007-30
Projekt: Namenlos
M /
Position: 080911_nord_JL
Seite: 1
11.09.2008
pORTFOLIO
2007-2009 BOLLINGER + GROHMANN schneider+schum acher
ERGEBNISSE
I n g e n i e u r e
LG 1 - ULS 1 Schnittgrößen M-2
Frankfur t am Main / Deutschland
REALISIERUNGSWETTBEWERB TORE NORD UND SÜD MESSE FRANKFURT
BT 3 A
BT 3 B
BT 3 C
BT 3 D
BT 3 E
BT 1,2,3 F
BT 3 G
BT 3 H
REALISIERUNGSWETTBEWERB TORE NORD UND SÜD MESSE FRANKFURT
Tor Nord/ die Determination der Stützenstellungen und Hauptträgern B+G Ingenieure Bollinger und Grohmann GmbH
Tor Nord/ die Determination den sekunderen Tragwerken
Westhafenplatz 1, 60327 FRANKFURT AM MAIN circle Pt0
circle Pt1
circle Pt2
circle Pt3 helix Pt6
circle Pt29 helix Pt9
Projekt: Namenlos
circle Pt27
circle Pt5
helix Pt12
Position: 080911_nord_sg
helix Pt3
helix Pt17
circle Pt6
BT 4 D
helix Pt19 helix Pt21
helix Pt2
Tel: 069/240007-34 - Fax: 069/240007-30
circle Pt4
circle Pt28
circle Pt26
Seite: 1
circle Pt7
helix Pt23 helix Pt14
11.09.2008
circle Pt25 circle Pt8
helix Pt15 helix Pt27
ERGEBNISSE
circle Pt24
helix Pt26
helix Pt29
circle Pt9
helix Pt24
helix Pt5 circle Pt23 helix Pt11
ND SÜD MESSE FRANKFURT
helix Pt0
LG 1 - ULS 1 Schnittgrößen M-2
Isometrie
helix Pt28 circle Pt10 helix Pt25
helix Pt8
circle Pt22 circle Pt11 helix Pt22
helix Pt16
helix Pt10
helix Pt20
helix Pt7 circle Pt21 circle Pt12
helix Pt18 helix Pt13 circle Pt20 circle Pt13 helix Pt4 circle Pt19
circle Pt14 helix Pt1 circle Pt18
circle Pt15 circle Pt17
circle Pt16
nnamretsuM .gnI-.lpiD oreubreinegnI tdatsretsuM 99999 ,99 gewretsuM
gnuztuN nelleizremmok ruz thciN - noisreV-omeD BT 1,2 D
BT 1,2 E
BT 1,2,3 F
BT 1,2 G
BT 1,2 H
LJ_dron_119080 :noitisoP
1 :etieS BT 2 B
BT 2 C
8002.90.11
INGO SCHRADER ARCHITEKT BDA
BOLLINGER INGO+ S GROHMANN CHRADER I n g e n i e u r e
ARCHITEKT
BDA
gnuthciR-Y nI
REALISIERUNGSWETTBEWERB TORE NORD UND SÜD MESSE FRANKFURT
Tor Süd II
Tor Nord / optimier t
Momentenverlauf BOLLINGER + GROHMANN
INGO SCHRADER ARCHITEKT BDA
I n g e n i e u r e
BOLLINGER + GROHMANN I n g e n i e u r e
REALISIERUNGSWETTBEWERB TORE NORD UND SÜD MESSE FRANKFURT
Tor Süd
Tor Nord/ Evolutionäre Verfahren der Vielfalt von Tragwerken
INGO SCHRADER ARCHITEKT BDA
REALISIERUNGSWETTBEWERB TORE NORD UND SÜD MESSE FRANKFURT
Isometrie 1 FINISH /CLEAR 2 3 4 /COM, Structural 5 /UNITS,SI ! [m,N,s,kg] 6 7 8 ! ---- vordefinierte Variablen 9 10 E_Beton =34300000000 11 NU_Beton =0.2 12 Dichte_Beton1 =0 13 Dichte_Beton2 =2500 14 D1=0.3 15 D2=0.3 16 17 18 /PREP7 19 20 ! Elementdefinition 21 ET,1,SHELL63 22 23 ! Querschnittsdefinition 24 R,1,D1,D1,D1,D1, , , 25 R,2,D2,D2,D2,D2, , , 26 27 ! Materialeigenschaften 28 MPTEMP,1,0 29 MPDATA,EX,1,,E_Beton 30 MPDATA,EX,2,,E_Beton 31 MPDATA,EX,3,,E_Beton 32 MPDATA,PRXY,1,,NU_Beton 33 MPDATA,PRXY,2,,NU_Beton 34 MPDATA,PRXY,3,,NU_Beton 35 MPTEMP,,,,,,,, 36 MPTEMP ,1,0 37 MPDATA,DENS,1,,Dichte_Beton1 38 MPDATA,DENS,2,,Dichte_Beton2 39 MPDATA,DENS,3,,Dichte_Beton1 solnemaN :tkejorP 40 41 !Definition der Knotenkorrdinaten 42 KN1=13 BOLLINGER + GROHMA 43 KN2=12.6 I n g e n i e u ESSINBEGRE 44 KN3=11.1 45 1 SLU - 1 GL negnubeihcsreV 46 K,1,-KN1,KN1,0 47 K,2,-KN2,KN1,0 48 K,3,-KN3,KN1,0 49 K,4,KN3,KN1,0 50 K,5,KN2,KN1,0 51 K,6,KN1,KN1,0 52 K,7,-KN1,KN2,0 53 K,8,-KN2,KN2,0 54 K,9,-KN3,KN2,0 55 K,10,KN3,KN2,0 56 K,11,KN2,KN2,0 57 K,12,KN1,KN2,0 58 K,13,-KN1,KN3,0 59 K,14,-KN2,KN3,0 60 K,15,-KN3,KN3,0
mm 61.16 :u xaM 04 :negnubeihcsreV rüf rotkaF
m 501.1 REALISIERUNGSWETTBEWERB TORE NORD UND SÜD MESSE FRANKFURT
496.048 kNm
Max M-2: 260.40, Min M-2: -576.32 kNm
REALISIERUNGSWETTBEWERB TORE NORD UND SÜD MESSE FRANKFURT RSTAB 5.15.210 Räumliche Stabwerke
INGO SCHRADER ARCHITEKT BDA
BOLLINGER + GROHMANN Ing.-Software DLUBAL GmbH I n g e n i e u r e
www.dlubal.de
319.696 kNm
Max M-2: 275.28, Min M-2: -371.43 kNm
RSTAB 5.15.210 Räumliche Stabwerke
Ing.-Software DLUBAL GmbH
www.dlubal.de
BOLLINGER + GROHMANN
INGO SCHRADER ARCHITEKT BDA
I n g e n i e u r e
I n g e n i e u
BOLLINGER + GROHMAN
Tor Nord
17
Tor Süd
Tor Süd II
M /
pORTFOLIO
2007-2009 schneider+schum acher
Frankfur t am Main / Deutschland
BT 3 A
BT 3 B
BT 3 C
BT 3 D
BT 3 E
BT 1,2,3 F
BT 3 G
BT 3 H
STÄDEL MUSEUM /
Frankfur t am Main / Deutschland
BT 4 D
BT 1,2 D
BT 1,2 E
BT 1,2,3 F
BT 1,2 G
BT 1,2 H
BT 2 B
BT 2 C
Städel Museum Architect: Schneider+Schumacher Architekten
BOLLINGER + GROHMANN I n g e n i e u r e
1 FINISH /CLEAR 2 3 4 /COM, Structural 5 /UNITS,SI ! [m,N,s,kg] 6 7 8 ! ---- vordefinierte Variablen 9 10 E_Beton =34300000000 11 NU_Beton =0.2 12 Dichte_Beton1 =0 13 Dichte_Beton2 =2500 14 D1=0.3 15 D2=0.3 16 17 18 /PREP7 19 20 ! Elementdefinition 21 ET,1,SHELL63 22 23 ! Querschnittsdefinition 24 R,1,D1,D1,D1,D1, , , 25 R,2,D2,D2,D2,D2, , , 26 27 ! Materialeigenschaften 28 MPTEMP,1,0 29 MPDATA,EX,1,,E_Beton 30 MPDATA,EX,2,,E_Beton 31 MPDATA,EX,3,,E_Beton 32 MPDATA,PRXY,1,,NU_Beton 33 MPDATA,PRXY,2,,NU_Beton 34 MPDATA,PRXY,3,,NU_Beton 35 MPTEMP,,,,,,,, 36 MPTEMP ,1,0 37 MPDATA,DENS,1,,Dichte_Beton1 38 MPDATA,DENS,2,,Dichte_Beton2 39 MPDATA,DENS,3,,Dichte_Beton1 40 41 !Definition der Knotenkorrdinaten 42 KN1=13 43 KN2=12.6 44 KN3=11.1 45 46 K,1,-KN1,KN1,0 47 K,2,-KN2,KN1,0 48 K,3,-KN3,KN1,0 49 K,4,KN3,KN1,0 50 K,5,KN2,KN1,0 51 K,6,KN1,KN1,0 52 K,7,-KN1,KN2,0 53 K,8,-KN2,KN2,0 54 K,9,-KN3,KN2,0 55 K,10,KN3,KN2,0 56 K,11,KN2,KN2,0 57 K,12,KN1,KN2,0 58 K,13,-KN1,KN3,0 59 K,14,-KN2,KN3,0 60 K,15,-KN3,KN3,0
schneider+schumacher
For this project a Script based on RhinoScript and Grasshopper was conceived for the design of the shell of the Stadel project. The form-finding was proceeded under Ansys. Three-dimensional geometrical scripting work made the combination of structural, architectural and constructive constraints possible.A specific module to implement the reinforcement bars in the shell was developed and the geometrical challenges due to the specific architectural shape in combination with a rectangular grid and the perfectly circular form of the different openings were met.
18
BOLLIN
M /
2007-2009 schneider+schum acher
pORTFOLIO
Frankfur t am Main / Deutschland
BT 3 A
BT 3 B
BT 3 C
BT 3 D
BT 3 E
BT 1,2,3 F
BT 3 G
BT 3 H
STÄDEL MUSEUM /
Frankfur t am Main / Deutschland
BOLLINGER + GROHMANN I n g e n i e u r e
BT 4 D
BT 1,2 D
BT 1,2 E
BT 1,2,3 F
BT 1,2 G
BT 1,2 H
BT 2 B
BT 2 C
1 FINISH /CLEAR 2 3 4 /COM, Structural 5 /UNITS,SI ! [m,N,s,kg] 6 7 8 ! ---- vordefinierte Variablen 9 10 E_Beton =34300000000 11 NU_Beton =0.2 12 Dichte_Beton1 =0 13 Dichte_Beton2 =2500 14 D1=0.3 15 D2=0.3 16 17 18 /PREP7 19 20 ! Elementdefinition 21 ET,1,SHELL63 22 23 ! Querschnittsdefinition 24 R,1,D1,D1,D1,D1, , , 25 R,2,D2,D2,D2,D2, , , 26 27 ! Materialeigenschaften 28 MPTEMP,1,0 29 MPDATA,EX,1,,E_Beton 30 MPDATA,EX,2,,E_Beton 31 MPDATA,EX,3,,E_Beton 32 MPDATA,PRXY,1,,NU_Beton 33 MPDATA,PRXY,2,,NU_Beton 34 MPDATA,PRXY,3,,NU_Beton 35 MPTEMP,,,,,,,, 36 MPTEMP ,1,0 37 MPDATA,DENS,1,,Dichte_Beton1 38 MPDATA,DENS,2,,Dichte_Beton2 39 MPDATA,DENS,3,,Dichte_Beton1 40 41 !Definition der Knotenkorrdinaten 42 KN1=13 43 KN2=12.6 44 KN3=11.1 45 46 K,1,-KN1,KN1,0 47 K,2,-KN2,KN1,0 48 K,3,-KN3,KN1,0 49 K,4,KN3,KN1,0 50 K,5,KN2,KN1,0 51 K,6,KN1,KN1,0 52 K,7,-KN1,KN2,0 53 K,8,-KN2,KN2,0 54 K,9,-KN3,KN2,0 55 K,10,KN3,KN2,0 56 K,11,KN2,KN2,0 57 K,12,KN1,KN2,0 58 K,13,-KN1,KN3,0 59 K,14,-KN2,KN3,0 60 K,15,-KN3,KN3,0
schneider+schumacher
19
BOLLIN
ACaDEmY of ARCHITECTuRE and ARTS
pORTFOLIO
State Academy of Architecture and Arts, Rostov na Donu/Russia
My interests in architecture had begun with trying to justify beauty by looking at nature. I started my studies in 1999 at the University of Architectire and Fine Art of Rotov(Russia). During this time I had a great interest in juxtaposition of mathematics, geometrical proportion, colors and the architectural history. In order to come up with new design idea, first I learned classical methods of sketching and paintings[001], in which I learned to get a feeling for form, colors and proportion. Experience I gathered while doing research about costructivists[002] greatly influenced my design works afterwoods.
1998-2000 School of Fine Art of Rostow. Paintings exemplifying study of feeling for shape, ligth and proporiton.
2
pORTFOLIO
State Academy of Architecture and Arts, Rostov na Donu/Russia
Pictures from research paper ”Beyond the October Revolution”. Theme was about the changes experienced in architecture towards one based on social concepts and processess driven by scientific knowledge . Paper was based on works of El Lissitzky, Ivan Leonidov, Vladimir Shuchov, Iakov Chernikhov, Wladimir Tatlin works.
My bachelor diploma “ROSSELMASH Head Office “(p.4) was focused on the developement of a new kind of office building, which would allow a flexible use while Russia entered a new area of economical and technical progress. During the design process I concentrated on combining the precision enabled by 3D softwares for digital representation and significant design technics from the constructivists. 3
pORTFOLIO
State Academy of Architecture and Arts, Rostov on Don/Russia
ROSSELMASH Head Office Bachelor Diploma [2004] by Professor Nikolay N. Titomirov The design of this urban quarter is based on the landmarks of constructivist’s buildings put together with exploration of geometrical possibilities in 3D Software.
4
BauHauS UNIvERSITY
pORTFOLIO
Bauhaus University of Weimar, Germany
Autobahnmuseum[2005] by Dr. J.H. Gleiter After completing my Bachelor degree in 2004, I continued my education at Bauhaus University in Weimar(Germany). I was mainly attracted by modernism and the newest technologies. In autum 2005 together with my colleague J.Gaun we designed a small museum for the german “Autobahn“. The form here is based on a principle of deformation that follows function. I wrote an algorhitm in MaxScript that makes geometrical transformations of the building possible. During the work on this project I discovered the book of Lars Spybroeck “Machining Architecture“. Next semester I moved to Kassel(Germany) in order to study it deeper.
5
UNIvERSITY OF KaSSEL
pORTFOLIO
2006-2007
STEEL and FREEDOM Dancing Tower [2006] by Professor Lars Spuybroek Dancing Tower is an example of application of “Machining architecture” tools. The researches in form-generation were promoted by Spuybroek. The basic structural principle of the skyscraper is based on the gothik principle of branching.
6
pORTFOLIO
2006-2007
First part of the design was a research on gothic ornamentic structures and their translation into the language of NURBs. Next step was a shift towards a structural system from a curve clustering into a set of nodes constituting the building. The next step was an act of convergence, which consisted in saving and using information contained in a diagram of dancers. I applied the movement of dancing people to design the skyscraper. Lastly was a divergent phase - I mobilized the systems onto the skyscraper, where the dancing diagram became a generative building. I was using MEL for the simulation of the dancing diagram.
7
pORTFOLIO
2006-2007
Parametric area moduls Digital Stones [2007] by Oliver Tessmann, Markus Schein In spring 2007 Oliver Tessmann and Markus Schein offered a seminar for students who were interested in getting better knowledge in RhinoScript and digital production. The aim was to design a parametrical module and bring it to production. The results of our works were published in the book “Parametrische Flächenmodule” by Tessmann and Schein.
8
[ 36 - 37 ]
pORTFOLIO
2006-2007
TENSEGRITY Die Umleitung der Gravitation by Professor Frank Stepper The twentiest century experienced a global shift towards the understanding of tensional structures, that is to say the substitution of compression elements by tension elements - the beginning of a suspended architecture. Tensegrity was a big part of it, unfortunately the process did not lead to any major architectural path. My work was aimed at researching possible ways to apply tensegrity to architecture.
9
pORTFOLIO
2006-2007
Skyscraper structures based on mathematical area systems Diplom II [2007] by Professor Dipl.-Ing. Manfred Grohmann, Dipl.-Ing. Mirco Becker, Dipl.-Ing. Oliver Tessmann, Dipl.-Ing. Christian Troche In my diploma I felt inspired by the beauty of mathematical surfaces, meanwhile paying attention to functional, constructive and historical principles of high-rise buildings. I designed a plugin for Rhino which allowed thousand possible configurations of different skyscrapers following the principal of minimal surfaces in both symmetrical and asymmetrical ways.
10
pORTFOLIO
2006-2007
11
M /
pORTFOLIO
2007-2009 BOLLINGER + GROHMANN
schneider+schumacher
Frankfur t am Main / Deutschland
I n g e n i e u r e
BT 3 A
BT 3 B
BT 3 C
BT 3 D
BT 3 E
BT 1,2,3 F
BT 3 G
BT 3 H
BT 4 D
BT 1,2 D
BT 1,2 E
BT 1,2,3 F
BT 1,2 G
BT 1,2 H
BT 2 B
BT 2 C
1 FINISH /CLEAR 2 3 4 /COM, Structural 5 /UNITS,SI ! [m,N,s,kg] 6 7 8 ! ---- vordefinierte Variablen 9 10 E_Beton =34300000000 11 NU_Beton =0.2 12 Dichte_Beton1 =0 13 Dichte_Beton2 =2500 14 D1=0.3 15 D2=0.3 16 17 18 /PREP7 19 20 ! Elementdefinition 21 ET,1,SHELL63 22 23 ! Querschnittsdefinition 24 R,1,D1,D1,D1,D1, , , 25 R,2,D2,D2,D2,D2, , , 26 27 ! Materialeigenschaften 28 MPTEMP,1,0 29 MPDATA,EX,1,,E_Beton 30 MPDATA,EX,2,,E_Beton 31 MPDATA,EX,3,,E_Beton 32 MPDATA,PRXY,1,,NU_Beton 33 MPDATA,PRXY,2,,NU_Beton 34 MPDATA,PRXY,3,,NU_Beton 35 MPTEMP,,,,,,,, 36 MPTEMP ,1,0 37 MPDATA,DENS,1,,Dichte_Beton1 38 MPDATA,DENS,2,,Dichte_Beton2 39 MPDATA,DENS,3,,Dichte_Beton1 40 41 !Definition der Knotenkorrdinaten 42 KN1=13 43 KN2=12.6 44 KN3=11.1 45 46 K,1,-KN1,KN1,0 47 K,2,-KN2,KN1,0 48 K,3,-KN3,KN1,0 49 K,4,KN3,KN1,0 50 K,5,KN2,KN1,0 51 K,6,KN1,KN1,0 52 K,7,-KN1,KN2,0 53 K,8,-KN2,KN2,0 54 K,9,-KN3,KN2,0 55 K,10,KN3,KN2,0 56 K,11,KN2,KN2,0 57 K,12,KN1,KN2,0 58 K,13,-KN1,KN3,0 59 K,14,-KN2,KN3,0 60 K,15,-KN3,KN3,0
I’m very thankful towards Bollinger+Grohmann for my time spent their and the experience gained in using “computer based design“ (CAD) in a framework of international projects in close collaboration with famous architekts like COOP Himmelb(l)au, Willmote&Associes SA, Schneider+Schuhmacher Architekten, ODBC ARCHITECTES and Gerber Architekten. During my work I developed new kinds of computer based design technics and focused on their integration in architectural and structural design. I concentrated on parametrical form-finding methods, algorithmical generation of structures and architectural forms, computer controlled fabrication processes - all of which belong to this emergent architectural paradigm widespread from the field of theoretical research unto new design niches. The potential of computer based methods reaches far more out than just the automation of given design technics. It reshuffles the relation and collaboration between architect and engineer. I believe that they must still keep their distinction and expand in parallel thanks to these new tools. My focus was always on exploring new possibilities and following a strict set of rules.
12
M /
2007-2009 schneider+schum acher
pORTFOLIO
Frankfur t am Main / Deutschland
BOLLINGER + GROHMANN I n g e n i e u r e
BT 3 A
BT 3 B
BT 3 C
BT 3 D
BT 3 E
BT 1,2,3 F
BT 3 G
BT 3 H
Odile DECQ Benoit CORNETTE ARCHITECTES - URBANISTES DPLG
BT 4 D
BT 1,2 D
BT 1,2 E
BT 1,2,3 F
BT 1,2 G
BT 1,2 H
BT 2 B
BT 2 C
1 FINISH /CLEAR 2 3 4 /COM, Structural 5 /UNITS,SI ! [m,N,s,kg] 6 7 8 ! ---- vordefinierte Variablen 9 10 E_Beton =34300000000 11 NU_Beton =0.2 12 Dichte_Beton1 =0 13 Dichte_Beton2 =2500 14 D1=0.3 15 D2=0.3 16 17 18 /PREP7 19 20 ! Elementdefinition 21 ET,1,SHELL63 22 23 ! Querschnittsdefinition 24 R,1,D1,D1,D1,D1, , , 25 R,2,D2,D2,D2,D2, , , 26 27 ! Materialeigenschaften 28 MPTEMP,1,0 29 MPDATA,EX,1,,E_Beton 30 MPDATA,EX,2,,E_Beton 31 MPDATA,EX,3,,E_Beton 32 MPDATA,PRXY,1,,NU_Beton 33 MPDATA,PRXY,2,,NU_Beton 34 MPDATA,PRXY,3,,NU_Beton 35 MPTEMP,,,,,,,, 36 MPTEMP ,1,0 37 MPDATA,DENS,1,,Dichte_Beton1 38 MPDATA,DENS,2,,Dichte_Beton2 39 MPDATA,DENS,3,,Dichte_Beton1 40 41 !Definition der Knotenkorrdinaten 42 KN1=13 43 KN2=12.6 44 KN3=11.1 45 46 K,1,-KN1,KN1,0 47 K,2,-KN2,KN1,0 48 K,3,-KN3,KN1,0 49 K,4,KN3,KN1,0 50 K,5,KN2,KN1,0 51 K,6,KN1,KN1,0 52 K,7,-KN1,KN2,0 53 K,8,-KN2,KN2,0 54 K,9,-KN3,KN2,0 55 K,10,KN3,KN2,0 56 K,11,KN2,KN2,0 57 K,12,KN1,KN2,0 58 K,13,-KN1,KN3,0 59 K,14,-KN2,KN3,0 60 K,15,-KN3,KN3,0
isoCurves in anology with the Sphere with Longitude and Latitude
GARE MARITIME DE TANGER MED Tanger[2008] The shape of ODBCA’s building in Tanger is defined by an irregular three-dimensional freeform, with tree different layers inside. The special ODBCA’s design would be more or less impossible throug a traditional approach. The implementation of a parametric 3D-Model for the building’s geometry helped to find new structural design solution - by changing the location of the beams for example. This model was used for the coordination of subsequent planning steps and to assess the influence of further design settings.
13
[06] [04]
[6]_analysis of maximal radius of surface-01 2007-2009 BOLLINGER + GROHMANN [7]_analysis surface-01 s cof h nmaximal e i d e r radius + s c hof um acher I n g e n i e u r e
BT 3 A
BT 3 B
BT 3 C
BT 3 D
BT 3 E
BT 1,2,3 F
BT 3 G
BT 3 H
curvature pORTFOLIO analysis of 01-surface showed, that it‘ll be M / Frankfur t am Main / Deutschland nroll the surface. 5] shos an unrollable surface like a cilindrical surface.
Odile the DECQ Benoit CORNETTE ARCHITECTES - URBANISTES basicaly values of minimal and maximal radius showed the true pos- DPLG sibilities of later paneling of surfases. In few words: the fidelity construction form directly depends on the quality of the 3d surfaces
BT 4 D
[05]
[06] BT 1,2 D
BT 1,2 E
BT 1,2,3 F
BT 1,2 G
BT 1,2 H
BT 2 B
BT 2 C
6]_analysis of maximal radius of surface-01 7]_analysis of maximal radius of surface-01
1 FINISH /CLEAR 2 3 4 /COM, Structural 5 /UNITS,SI ! [m,N,s,kg] 6 7 8 ! ---- vordefinierte Variablen 9 10 E_Beton =34300000000 11 NU_Beton =0.2 12 Dichte_Beton1 =0 13 Dichte_Beton2 =2500 14 D1=0.3 15 D2=0.3 16 17 18 /PREP7 19 20 ! Elementdefinition 21 ET,1,SHELL63 22 23 ! Querschnittsdefinition 24 R,1,D1,D1,D1,D1, , , 25 R,2,D2,D2,D2,D2, , , 26 27 ! Materialeigenschaften 28 MPTEMP,1,0 29 MPDATA,EX,1,,E_Beton 30 MPDATA,EX,2,,E_Beton 31 MPDATA,EX,3,,E_Beton 32 MPDATA,PRXY,1,,NU_Beton 33 MPDATA,PRXY,2,,NU_Beton 34 MPDATA,PRXY,3,,NU_Beton 35 MPTEMP,,,,,,,, 36 MPTEMP ,1,0 37 MPDATA,DENS,1,,Dichte_Beton1 38 MPDATA,DENS,2,,Dichte_Beton2 39 MPDATA,DENS,3,,Dichte_Beton1 40 41 !Definition der Knotenkorrdinaten 42 KN1=13 43 KN2=12.6 44 KN3=11.1 45 46 K,1,-KN1,KN1,0 47 K,2,-KN2,KN1,0 48 K,3,-KN3,KN1,0 49 K,4,KN3,KN1,0 50 K,5,KN2,KN1,0 51 K,6,KN1,KN1,0 52 K,7,-KN1,KN2,0 53 K,8,-KN2,KN2,0 54 K,9,-KN3,KN2,0 55 K,10,KN3,KN2,0 56 K,11,KN2,KN2,0 57 K,12,KN1,KN2,0 58 K,13,-KN1,KN3,0 59 K,14,-KN2,KN3,0 60 K,15,-KN3,KN3,0
asicaly the values of minimal and maximal radius showed the true posibilities of later paneling of surfases. In few words: the fidelity construcon form directly depends on the quality of the 3d surfaces
[07]
[07]
14
M /
2007-2009 schneider+schum acher
pORTFOLIO
Frankfur t am Main / Deutschland
BOLLINGER + GROHMANN I n g e n i e u r e
BT 3 A
BT 3 B
BT 3 C
BT 3 D
BT 3 E
BT 1,2,3 F
BT 3 G
BT 3 H
BT 4 D
BT 1,2 D
BT 1,2 E
BT 1,2,3 F
BT 1,2 G
BT 1,2 H
BT 2 B
BT 2 C
1 FINISH /CLEAR 2 3 4 /COM, Structural 5 /UNITS,SI ! [m,N,s,kg] 6 7 8 ! ---- vordefinierte Variablen 9 10 E_Beton =34300000000 11 NU_Beton =0.2 12 Dichte_Beton1 =0 13 Dichte_Beton2 =2500 14 D1=0.3 15 D2=0.3 16 17 18 /PREP7 19 20 ! Elementdefinition 21 ET,1,SHELL63 22 23 ! Querschnittsdefinition 24 R,1,D1,D1,D1,D1, , , 25 R,2,D2,D2,D2,D2, , , 26 27 ! Materialeigenschaften 28 MPTEMP,1,0 29 MPDATA,EX,1,,E_Beton 30 MPDATA,EX,2,,E_Beton 31 MPDATA,EX,3,,E_Beton 32 MPDATA,PRXY,1,,NU_Beton 33 MPDATA,PRXY,2,,NU_Beton 34 MPDATA,PRXY,3,,NU_Beton 35 MPTEMP,,,,,,,, 36 MPTEMP ,1,0 37 MPDATA,DENS,1,,Dichte_Beton1 38 MPDATA,DENS,2,,Dichte_Beton2 39 MPDATA,DENS,3,,Dichte_Beton1 40 41 !Definition der Knotenkorrdinaten 42 KN1=13 43 KN2=12.6 44 KN3=11.1 45 46 K,1,-KN1,KN1,0 47 K,2,-KN2,KN1,0 48 K,3,-KN3,KN1,0 49 K,4,KN3,KN1,0 50 K,5,KN2,KN1,0 51 K,6,KN1,KN1,0 52 K,7,-KN1,KN2,0 53 K,8,-KN2,KN2,0 54 K,9,-KN3,KN2,0 55 K,10,KN3,KN2,0 56 K,11,KN2,KN2,0 57 K,12,KN1,KN2,0 58 K,13,-KN1,KN3,0 59 K,14,-KN2,KN3,0 60 K,15,-KN3,KN3,0
Prince Salman Science Oasis(PSSO) Riyadh, Saudi Arabia 2008 Architect: Gerber Architekten Engineers: Bollinger+Grohmann Ingenieure An automative generation process creating spatial trusses based on genetic algorithms was created by enabling data exchange between Rhino and Rstab through Visual Basic 2008 scripting. This was developed further on into a CAADCrooSS plug-in, which permitted to reduce the design process effectively by merging architectural and structural software together.
15
M /
pORTFOLIO
2007-2009 schneider+schum acher
Frankfur t am Main / Deutschland
BOLLINGER + GROHMANN I n g e n i e u r e
BT 3 A
BT 3 B
BT 3 C
BT 3 D
BT 3 E
BT 1,2,3 F
BT 3 G
BT 3 H
1 FINISH /CLEAR 2 3 4 /COM, Structural 5 /UNITS,SI ! [m,N,s,kg] 6 7 8 ! ---- vordefinierte Variablen 9 10 E_Beton =34300000000 11 NU_Beton =0.2 12 Dichte_Beton1 =0 13 Dichte_Beton2 =2500 14 D1=0.3 15 D2=0.3 16 17 18 /PREP7 19 20 ! Elementdefinition 21 ET,1,SHELL63 22 23 ! Querschnittsdefinition 24 R,1,D1,D1,D1,D1, , , 25 R,2,D2,D2,D2,D2, , , 26 27 ! Materialeigenschaften 28 MPTEMP,1,0 29 MPDATA,EX,1,,E_Beton 30 MPDATA,EX,2,,E_Beton 31 MPDATA,EX,3,,E_Beton 32 MPDATA,PRXY,1,,NU_Beton 33 MPDATA,PRXY,2,,NU_Beton 34 MPDATA,PRXY,3,,NU_Beton 35 MPTEMP,,,,,,,, 36 MPTEMP ,1,0 37 MPDATA,DENS,1,,Dichte_Beton1 38 MPDATA,DENS,2,,Dichte_Beton2 39 MPDATA,DENS,3,,Dichte_Beton1 40 41 !Definition der Knotenkorrdinaten 42 KN1=13 43 KN2=12.6 44 KN3=11.1 45 46 K,1,-KN1,KN1,0 47 K,2,-KN2,KN1,0 48 K,3,-KN3,KN1,0 49 K,4,KN3,KN1,0 50 K,5,KN2,KN1,0 51 K,6,KN1,KN1,0 52 K,7,-KN1,KN2,0 53 K,8,-KN2,KN2,0 54 K,9,-KN3,KN2,0 55 K,10,KN3,KN2,0 56 K,11,KN2,KN2,0 57 K,12,KN1,KN2,0 58 K,13,-KN1,KN3,0 59 K,14,-KN2,KN3,0 60 K,15,-KN3,KN3,0
REALISIERUNGSWETTBEWERB TORE NORD UND SÜD ME BT 4 D
BT 1,2 D
BT 1,2 E
BT 1,2,3 F
BT 1,2 G
BT 1,2 H
BT 2 B
BT 2 C
Tor Süd
North and South Gate of the Frankfort Fair Trade [2009] In close collaboration with the architect Ingo Schrader, a generative structure for three roofs was conceived for the competition “North and South Gate at the Frankfort Trade Fair”. The basic idea for the design was to realize an efficient structure with the help of an optimization algorithm, which would remind of the lightness and shape of a lotus leaf. Lightness, functionality and efficiency were the three key parameters for the generation of the structure, which despite of the way it looks is mainly based on order. 16
Tor Nord
Westhafenplatz 1, 60327 FRANKFURT AM MAIN Tel: 069/240007-34 - Fax: 069/240007-30
Projekt: Namenlos
M /
Position: 080911_nord_JL
Seite: 1
11.09.2008
pORTFOLIO
2007-2009 BOLLINGER + GROHMANN schneider+schum acher
ERGEBNISSE
I n g e n i e u r e
LG 1 - ULS 1 Schnittgrößen M-2
Frankfur t am Main / Deutschland
REALISIERUNGSWETTBEWERB TORE NORD UND SÜD MESSE FRANKFURT
BT 3 A
BT 3 B
BT 3 C
BT 3 D
BT 3 E
BT 1,2,3 F
BT 3 G
BT 3 H
REALISIERUNGSWETTBEWERB TORE NORD UND SÜD MESSE FRANKFURT
Tor Nord/ die Determination der Stützenstellungen und Hauptträgern B+G Ingenieure Bollinger und Grohmann GmbH
Tor Nord/ die Determination den sekunderen Tragwerken
Westhafenplatz 1, 60327 FRANKFURT AM MAIN circle Pt0
circle Pt1
circle Pt2
circle Pt3 helix Pt6
circle Pt29 helix Pt9
Projekt: Namenlos
circle Pt27
circle Pt5
helix Pt12
Position: 080911_nord_sg
helix Pt3
helix Pt17
circle Pt6
BT 4 D
helix Pt19 helix Pt21
helix Pt2
Tel: 069/240007-34 - Fax: 069/240007-30
circle Pt4
circle Pt28
circle Pt26
Seite: 1
circle Pt7
helix Pt23 helix Pt14
11.09.2008
circle Pt25 circle Pt8
helix Pt15 helix Pt27
ERGEBNISSE
circle Pt24
helix Pt26
helix Pt29
circle Pt9
helix Pt24
helix Pt5 circle Pt23 helix Pt11
ND SÜD MESSE FRANKFURT
helix Pt0
LG 1 - ULS 1 Schnittgrößen M-2
Isometrie
helix Pt28 circle Pt10 helix Pt25
helix Pt8
circle Pt22 circle Pt11 helix Pt22
helix Pt16
helix Pt10
helix Pt20
helix Pt7 circle Pt21 circle Pt12
helix Pt18 helix Pt13 circle Pt20 circle Pt13 helix Pt4 circle Pt19
circle Pt14 helix Pt1 circle Pt18
circle Pt15 circle Pt17
circle Pt16
nnamretsuM .gnI-.lpiD oreubreinegnI tdatsretsuM 99999 ,99 gewretsuM
gnuztuN nelleizremmok ruz thciN - noisreV-omeD BT 1,2 D
BT 1,2 E
BT 1,2,3 F
BT 1,2 G
BT 1,2 H
LJ_dron_119080 :noitisoP
1 :etieS BT 2 B
BT 2 C
8002.90.11
INGO SCHRADER ARCHITEKT BDA
BOLLINGER INGO+ S GROHMANN CHRADER I n g e n i e u r e
ARCHITEKT
BDA
gnuthciR-Y nI
REALISIERUNGSWETTBEWERB TORE NORD UND SÜD MESSE FRANKFURT
Tor Süd II
Tor Nord / optimier t
Momentenverlauf BOLLINGER + GROHMANN
INGO SCHRADER ARCHITEKT BDA
I n g e n i e u r e
BOLLINGER + GROHMANN I n g e n i e u r e
REALISIERUNGSWETTBEWERB TORE NORD UND SÜD MESSE FRANKFURT
Tor Süd
Tor Nord/ Evolutionäre Verfahren der Vielfalt von Tragwerken
INGO SCHRADER ARCHITEKT BDA
REALISIERUNGSWETTBEWERB TORE NORD UND SÜD MESSE FRANKFURT
Isometrie 1 FINISH /CLEAR 2 3 4 /COM, Structural 5 /UNITS,SI ! [m,N,s,kg] 6 7 8 ! ---- vordefinierte Variablen 9 10 E_Beton =34300000000 11 NU_Beton =0.2 12 Dichte_Beton1 =0 13 Dichte_Beton2 =2500 14 D1=0.3 15 D2=0.3 16 17 18 /PREP7 19 20 ! Elementdefinition 21 ET,1,SHELL63 22 23 ! Querschnittsdefinition 24 R,1,D1,D1,D1,D1, , , 25 R,2,D2,D2,D2,D2, , , 26 27 ! Materialeigenschaften 28 MPTEMP,1,0 29 MPDATA,EX,1,,E_Beton 30 MPDATA,EX,2,,E_Beton 31 MPDATA,EX,3,,E_Beton 32 MPDATA,PRXY,1,,NU_Beton 33 MPDATA,PRXY,2,,NU_Beton 34 MPDATA,PRXY,3,,NU_Beton 35 MPTEMP,,,,,,,, 36 MPTEMP ,1,0 37 MPDATA,DENS,1,,Dichte_Beton1 38 MPDATA,DENS,2,,Dichte_Beton2 39 MPDATA,DENS,3,,Dichte_Beton1 solnemaN :tkejorP 40 41 !Definition der Knotenkorrdinaten 42 KN1=13 BOLLINGER + GROHMA 43 KN2=12.6 I n g e n i e u ESSINBEGRE 44 KN3=11.1 45 1 SLU - 1 GL negnubeihcsreV 46 K,1,-KN1,KN1,0 47 K,2,-KN2,KN1,0 48 K,3,-KN3,KN1,0 49 K,4,KN3,KN1,0 50 K,5,KN2,KN1,0 51 K,6,KN1,KN1,0 52 K,7,-KN1,KN2,0 53 K,8,-KN2,KN2,0 54 K,9,-KN3,KN2,0 55 K,10,KN3,KN2,0 56 K,11,KN2,KN2,0 57 K,12,KN1,KN2,0 58 K,13,-KN1,KN3,0 59 K,14,-KN2,KN3,0 60 K,15,-KN3,KN3,0
mm 61.16 :u xaM 04 :negnubeihcsreV rüf rotkaF
m 501.1 REALISIERUNGSWETTBEWERB TORE NORD UND SÜD MESSE FRANKFURT
496.048 kNm
Max M-2: 260.40, Min M-2: -576.32 kNm
REALISIERUNGSWETTBEWERB TORE NORD UND SÜD MESSE FRANKFURT RSTAB 5.15.210 Räumliche Stabwerke
INGO SCHRADER ARCHITEKT BDA
BOLLINGER + GROHMANN Ing.-Software DLUBAL GmbH I n g e n i e u r e
www.dlubal.de
319.696 kNm
Max M-2: 275.28, Min M-2: -371.43 kNm
RSTAB 5.15.210 Räumliche Stabwerke
Ing.-Software DLUBAL GmbH
www.dlubal.de
BOLLINGER + GROHMANN
INGO SCHRADER ARCHITEKT BDA
I n g e n i e u r e
I n g e n i e u
BOLLINGER + GROHMAN
Tor Nord
17
Tor Süd
Tor Süd II
M /
pORTFOLIO
2007-2009 schneider+schum acher
Frankfur t am Main / Deutschland
BT 3 A
BT 3 B
BT 3 C
BT 3 D
BT 3 E
BT 1,2,3 F
BT 3 G
BT 3 H
STÄDEL MUSEUM /
Frankfur t am Main / Deutschland
BT 4 D
BT 1,2 D
BT 1,2 E
BT 1,2,3 F
BT 1,2 G
BT 1,2 H
BT 2 B
BT 2 C
Städel Museum Architect: Schneider+Schumacher Architekten
BOLLINGER + GROHMANN I n g e n i e u r e
1 FINISH /CLEAR 2 3 4 /COM, Structural 5 /UNITS,SI ! [m,N,s,kg] 6 7 8 ! ---- vordefinierte Variablen 9 10 E_Beton =34300000000 11 NU_Beton =0.2 12 Dichte_Beton1 =0 13 Dichte_Beton2 =2500 14 D1=0.3 15 D2=0.3 16 17 18 /PREP7 19 20 ! Elementdefinition 21 ET,1,SHELL63 22 23 ! Querschnittsdefinition 24 R,1,D1,D1,D1,D1, , , 25 R,2,D2,D2,D2,D2, , , 26 27 ! Materialeigenschaften 28 MPTEMP,1,0 29 MPDATA,EX,1,,E_Beton 30 MPDATA,EX,2,,E_Beton 31 MPDATA,EX,3,,E_Beton 32 MPDATA,PRXY,1,,NU_Beton 33 MPDATA,PRXY,2,,NU_Beton 34 MPDATA,PRXY,3,,NU_Beton 35 MPTEMP,,,,,,,, 36 MPTEMP ,1,0 37 MPDATA,DENS,1,,Dichte_Beton1 38 MPDATA,DENS,2,,Dichte_Beton2 39 MPDATA,DENS,3,,Dichte_Beton1 40 41 !Definition der Knotenkorrdinaten 42 KN1=13 43 KN2=12.6 44 KN3=11.1 45 46 K,1,-KN1,KN1,0 47 K,2,-KN2,KN1,0 48 K,3,-KN3,KN1,0 49 K,4,KN3,KN1,0 50 K,5,KN2,KN1,0 51 K,6,KN1,KN1,0 52 K,7,-KN1,KN2,0 53 K,8,-KN2,KN2,0 54 K,9,-KN3,KN2,0 55 K,10,KN3,KN2,0 56 K,11,KN2,KN2,0 57 K,12,KN1,KN2,0 58 K,13,-KN1,KN3,0 59 K,14,-KN2,KN3,0 60 K,15,-KN3,KN3,0
schneider+schumacher
For this project a Script based on RhinoScript and Grasshopper was conceived for the design of the shell of the Stadel project. The form-finding was proceeded under Ansys. Three-dimensional geometrical scripting work made the combination of structural, architectural and constructive constraints possible.A specific module to implement the reinforcement bars in the shell was developed and the geometrical challenges due to the specific architectural shape in combination with a rectangular grid and the perfectly circular form of the different openings were met.
18
BOLLIN
M /
2007-2009 schneider+schum acher
pORTFOLIO
Frankfur t am Main / Deutschland
BT 3 A
BT 3 B
BT 3 C
BT 3 D
BT 3 E
BT 1,2,3 F
BT 3 G
BT 3 H
STÄDEL MUSEUM /
Frankfur t am Main / Deutschland
BOLLINGER + GROHMANN I n g e n i e u r e
BT 4 D
BT 1,2 D
BT 1,2 E
BT 1,2,3 F
BT 1,2 G
BT 1,2 H
BT 2 B
BT 2 C
1 FINISH /CLEAR 2 3 4 /COM, Structural 5 /UNITS,SI ! [m,N,s,kg] 6 7 8 ! ---- vordefinierte Variablen 9 10 E_Beton =34300000000 11 NU_Beton =0.2 12 Dichte_Beton1 =0 13 Dichte_Beton2 =2500 14 D1=0.3 15 D2=0.3 16 17 18 /PREP7 19 20 ! Elementdefinition 21 ET,1,SHELL63 22 23 ! Querschnittsdefinition 24 R,1,D1,D1,D1,D1, , , 25 R,2,D2,D2,D2,D2, , , 26 27 ! Materialeigenschaften 28 MPTEMP,1,0 29 MPDATA,EX,1,,E_Beton 30 MPDATA,EX,2,,E_Beton 31 MPDATA,EX,3,,E_Beton 32 MPDATA,PRXY,1,,NU_Beton 33 MPDATA,PRXY,2,,NU_Beton 34 MPDATA,PRXY,3,,NU_Beton 35 MPTEMP,,,,,,,, 36 MPTEMP ,1,0 37 MPDATA,DENS,1,,Dichte_Beton1 38 MPDATA,DENS,2,,Dichte_Beton2 39 MPDATA,DENS,3,,Dichte_Beton1 40 41 !Definition der Knotenkorrdinaten 42 KN1=13 43 KN2=12.6 44 KN3=11.1 45 46 K,1,-KN1,KN1,0 47 K,2,-KN2,KN1,0 48 K,3,-KN3,KN1,0 49 K,4,KN3,KN1,0 50 K,5,KN2,KN1,0 51 K,6,KN1,KN1,0 52 K,7,-KN1,KN2,0 53 K,8,-KN2,KN2,0 54 K,9,-KN3,KN2,0 55 K,10,KN3,KN2,0 56 K,11,KN2,KN2,0 57 K,12,KN1,KN2,0 58 K,13,-KN1,KN3,0 59 K,14,-KN2,KN3,0 60 K,15,-KN3,KN3,0
schneider+schumacher
19
BOLLIN
