Simulation of Fluorescent Concentrators - SCI Utah

Report 10 Downloads 25 Views
M. Bendig, J. Hanika, H. Dammertz, J. C. Goldschmidt, M. Peters, and M. Weber | August 10, 2008

Simulation of Fluorescent Concentrators

Simulation of Fluorescent Concentrators | Fluorescent Concentrators

Page 2

| August 10, 2008

Solar Energy Research I

cooperation with the Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems in Freiburg

I

raise efficiency – by concentration of light

I

problem: diffuse light

I

idea (around 1970): trap light inside medium

I

low efficiency → low research interest

I

interest increased again in the last years due to improved dyes, solar cells and concepts

Simulation of Fluorescent Concentrators | Fluorescent Concentrators

Page 3

| August 10, 2008

What is a Fluorescent Concentrator?

I

PMMA (acrylic glass) and fluorescent dye

I

concentrates direct and diffuse light on a solar cell principle:

I

I I I

absorption in dye re-emmitance according to Stokes shift (longer wavelength) total internal reflection (trap light inside medium)

Simulation of Fluorescent Concentrators | Fluorescent Concentrators

Page 4

| August 10, 2008

Absorption and Photoluminescence Spectra Absorption and Photoluminescence Spectra absorption photoluminescence

0.018 0.016

[dimensionless]

0.014 0.012 0.01 0.008 0.006 0.004 0.002 0 300

I

400

500 600 wavelength [nm]

re-absorption only possible in overlap

700

800

Simulation of Fluorescent Concentrators | Fluorescent Concentrators

Page 5

| August 10, 2008

Energy Loss Mechanisms

I

loss mechanisms have to be analysed for improvement

I

experimental testing of new concepts and analysis of physical processes difficult and expensive

I

analytical calculations and simulation complex and time-consuming

Simulation of Fluorescent Concentrators | The Simulation

Page 6

| August 10, 2008

Simulation Model ⇒ Monte Carlo (MC) method I

ray tracing of single photons (simplest simulation model, least error-prone)

I

uni-directional particle transport to avoid problems arising when connecting paths with different wavelengths

I

allows to investigate effects isolated from global path

Simulation of Fluorescent Concentrators | The Simulation

Page 7

| August 10, 2008

A Photon’s Path trough the Concentrator

I

sample spectrum AM 1.5 (MC inversion method)

I

sample start point

I

fix direction

Simulation of Fluorescent Concentrators | The Simulation

Page 8

| August 10, 2008

A Photon’s Path trough the Concentrator

I

calculate intersection with boundary

I

calculate reflection coefficient (Fresnel, Cauchy )

I

calculate new ray direction (Snell)

Simulation of Fluorescent Concentrators | The Simulation

Page 9

| August 10, 2008

A Photon’s Path trough the Concentrator

I

sample pathlength (MC inversion method, Lambert-Beer )

Page 10

Simulation of Fluorescent Concentrators | The Simulation

| August 10, 2008

A Photon’s Path trough the Concentrator

I

estimate absorption event

Page 11

Simulation of Fluorescent Concentrators | The Simulation

| August 10, 2008

A Photon’s Path trough the Concentrator

I

sample PL-spectrum (MC inversion method)

I

sample direction (MC inversion method)

I

sample pathlength (MC inversion method,) Lambert-Beer

Page 12

Simulation of Fluorescent Concentrators | The Simulation

| August 10, 2008

A Photon’s Path trough the Concentrator

I

calculate intersection with boundary

I

calculate reflection coefficient (Fresnel, Cauchy )

I

calculate new ray direction (reflection angle equals angle of incidence)

Page 13

Simulation of Fluorescent Concentrators | The Simulation

| August 10, 2008

A Photon’s Path trough the Concentrator

I

sample pathlength (MC inversion method, Lambert-Beer )

I

estimate absorption event

Page 14

Simulation of Fluorescent Concentrators | The Simulation

| August 10, 2008

A Photon’s Path trough the Concentrator

I

sample PL-spectrum (MC inversion method)

I

sample direction (MC inversion method )

I

sample pathlength (MC inversion method, Lambert-Beer )

I

calculate intersection with boundary

Page 15

Simulation of Fluorescent Concentrators | The Simulation

| August 10, 2008

A Photon’s Path trough the Concentrator

I

estimate absorption event → terminate ray

Page 16

Simulation of Fluorescent Concentrators | The Simulation

| August 10, 2008

Experiments and their Simulation I

physical measurement of input parameters: absorption spectrum, photoluminescence (PL-) spectrum, refractive indices and geometry

I

several experiments for analysis of fluorescent concentrators first step:

I

I I I

I

reproduce experiments “exactly” compare data to verify implementation explain small differences

second step: I I I

simulate experiments without limitations of “real” setup parameter variation evaluate results

Simulation of Fluorescent Concentrators | The Simulation

Page 17

| August 10, 2008

Reflection and Transmission Experiment

experiments with integrating sphere Transmission Spectrum

Reflection Spectrum 100 rays detected in reflection direction [%]

100

transmitted rays [%]

80

60

40

20

0 300

experimental data simulation data 400

500 600 Wavelength [nm]

700

800

experimental data simulation data

80

60

40

20

0 300

400

500 600 wavelength [nm]

700

800

Page 18

Simulation of Fluorescent Concentrators | The Simulation

| August 10, 2008

Absorption Absorption ≈ 1 − Reflection − Transmission calculated absorption as input → verification of simulated absorption Absorption Spectrum 100 rays with at least one absorption [%]

I I

experimental data simulation data

80

60

40

20

0 300

400

500 600 wavelength [nm]

700

800

Page 19

Simulation of Fluorescent Concentrators | The Simulation

| August 10, 2008

Angular Experiment Blind

PMMA half cylinder Light Photonic structure (optional) Detector Mirror (optional) Optical coupling

Page 20

Simulation of Fluorescent Concentrators | The Simulation

| August 10, 2008

Angular Experiment not fully specified → parameter variation: imperfect surface, scattering, properties of the blind, properties of the coupled cylinder Angular Distribution 0.018

experimental data simulation data 1 simulation data 2

0.016 0.014 0.012 light [fraction]

I

0.01 0.008 0.006 0.004 0.002 0 0

20

40

60

80 100 angle [degrees]

120

140

160

180

Page 21

Simulation of Fluorescent Concentrators | The Simulation

| August 10, 2008

Angular Experiment

Angular Distribution 0.016

experimental data simulation data

0.014

light [fraction]

0.012 0.01 0.008 0.006 0.004 0.002 0

0

20

40

60

80 100 angle [degrees]

120

140

160

180

Page 22

Simulation of Fluorescent Concentrators | The Simulation

| August 10, 2008

Fast Ray Tracing I

several millions of rays to be traced for one graph

I

exponentially more (in the number of parameters) needed for parameter variation

I

incoherent rays: ray packets/bundles not an option ray tracing kernel

I

I I I

triangle-based 4-ary BVH SAH-based construction

Page 23

Simulation of Fluorescent Concentrators | The Simulation

| August 10, 2008

Visuals I

direct comparison photograph/render

Page 24

Simulation of Fluorescent Concentrators | The Simulation

Non-Fluorescent Dragon

| August 10, 2008

Page 25

Simulation of Fluorescent Concentrators | The Simulation

Fluorescent Dragon

| August 10, 2008

Page 26

Simulation of Fluorescent Concentrators | Conclusion

| August 10, 2008

Future Work I

optimisation: I

concentrator stacks

I

photonic structures, mirrors, additional solar cells geometry optimisation different dyes (problem: infra-red range)

I I

Page 27

Simulation of Fluorescent Concentrators | Conclusion

| August 10, 2008

Summary I

fluorescent concentrators are made for improvement of efficiency and applicability of solar cells.

I

testing by simulation possible before (expensive) experimental testing

I

fast ray tracing makes automated parameter variation possible

I

general Monte Carlo simulation framework for physicists to gain insights in involved processes, for parameter optimisation (dye properties, geometry, ..) and for testing of new ideas

Questions?

Page 28

Simulation of Fluorescent Concentrators | Conclusion

Experimental Setup

| August 10, 2008