Standard Scheme 298 - Gov.uk
Summary of Results External Quality Assessment of Food Microbiology
Standard Scheme Distribution Number: 298
Sample Numbers: S0633, S0634
Distribution Date: Results Due: Report Date:
October 2017 10 November 2017 30 November 2017
Samples prepared and quality control tested by:
Angela Appea Richard Borrill Thomas Harper Zak Prior Judith Spellar Aneta Stranc Lili Tsegaye
Data analysed by:
Manchari Rajkumar Nita Patel
Report compiled by:
Manchari Rajkumar Nita Patel
Authorised by:
Nita Patel
This report must not be reproduced without permission of the organisers. Public Health England Food and Environmental Proficiency Testing Unit (FEPTU) 61 Colindale Avenue London NW9 5EQ Tel: +44 (0)20 8327 7119 Fax: +44 (0)20 8200 8264 Email: [email protected] The data in FEPTU reports is confidential
Page 1 of 20
Printed at 14:20 on Thursday, 30 November, 2017
For further information on the scheme please refer to: Scheme Guide: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/food-and-water-proficiency-testing-schemes-scheme-guide Guide to Scoring and Statistics: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/food-and-water-proficiency-testing-schemes-scoring-systems-and-statistics
General guidance for z-scores: Participants' enumeration results are converted into z-scores using the following formula:
Z = (xi -Xpt ) σpt
xi Xpt
= participants' result (expressed as a log 10 value) = assigned value (participants' consensus median (expressed as a log 10 value))
σpt
= the fixed standard deviation for the examination (calculated by FEPTU)
The σpt-value expresses the acceptable difference between the individual participant 's result and the participants' consensus median. The σpt-value used for calculating z-scores for all parameters in the Standard Scheme is 0.35. A guide to interpreting z-scores follows, although laboratories must interpret their scores in the context of their own laboratory situation: z = -1.99 to +1.99 z = -2 to -2.99 or +2 to +2.99 z= < -3.00 or > + 3.00
satisfactory questionable unsatisfactory
It is usually recommended that z-scores exceeding +/-2 are investigated to establish the possible cause. rule, PHE recommends that all questionable and unsatisfactory results are investigated.
As a general
FEPTU Quality control: To demonstrate homogeneity of the sample, a minimum of 10 freeze-dried vials, selected randomly from a batch, are tested in duplicate for parameters requiring enumeration and 10 freeze-dried vials are examined for pathogen detection.
To demonstrate stability of the sample, a minimum of nine vials, selected randomly from a batch, are examined throughout the distribution period, either for enumeration or pathogen detection. FEPTU results are determined using methods based on ISO methods and are included in the 'intended results' letters which provide guidance for participants regarding the assigned values. The FEPTU results are used for guidance in the preliminary intended results notification, letters are posted on the website immediately after every distribution; electronic notification of their availability is sent to all participants Refer to section 17.0 of the Scheme Guide if you have experienced difficulties with any of the examinations . https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/food-and-water-proficiency-testing-schemes-scheme-guide
All participants are reminded that reporting an incorrect or incomplete identification of pathogens from food samples could have serious public health implications. Similarly, the levels of micro-organisms reported in the sample may affect the subsequent outcome for the product. Participants are reminded that the purpose of scoring is to draw attention to incorrect or outlying results. Participants who report outlying results for enumerations on single occasions only should not be alarmed, although they should still assess the reason(s) for the outlying result. The results, as summarised in the performance assessment sheet included in this report, provide a more effective indication of on-going problems with food microbiology examinations.
The bar charts in this report are compiled using the processes outlined in the Guide to Scoring Systems and Statistics for the allocation of PHE scores. Z-scores are included on the sample-specific pages only; the relevant sections will be left blank if a z-score does not apply. Please contact FEPTU staff for advice and information: Repeat samples
Carmen Gomes or Kermin Daruwalla
Data Analysis
Nita Patel or Manchari Rajkumar
Microbiological advice
Nita Patel or Zak Prior
General comments and complaints
Nita Patel or Zak Prior
Scheme consultants
Melody Greenwood and Julie E. Russell
Scheme Co-ordinator
Nita Patel
Tel: Fax: Email:
+44 (0)20 8327 7119 +44 (0)20 8200 8264 [email protected]
FEPTU's website
Accreditation: PHE Food EQA Scheme for Standard is accredited by the United Kingdom Accreditation Service (UKAS) to ISO/IEC 17043:2010.
0006 The data in FEPTU reports is confidential
Page 2 of 20
Printed at 14:20 on Thursday, 30 November, 2017
Sample: S0633 Contents:
Salmonella Essen 4,12: g,m 47 (wild strain), Clostridium perfringens 2.4x10⁴ (wild strain), Escherichia coli 7.9x10³ (wild strain), Lactobacillus paracasei 5.9x10⁴ (wild strain)
All levels are presented as colony forming units (cfu) per ml reconstituted sample All levels are presented as colony forming units (cfu) per ml reconstituted sample
Expected Results: Examination
Expected Result
Listeria spp. (including L.mono)
Not Detected in 25g
L.monocytogenes
Not Detected in 25g
Your Result
Score
Z-score
Detected in 25g
Salmonella spp. Clostridium perfringens
5.1x10³ - 5.1x10⁴ cfu g ⁻¹
Aerobic colony count
2.5x10⁴ - 2.5x10⁵ cfu g ⁻¹
Escherichia coli
1.2x10³ - 2.5x10⁴ cfu g ⁻¹
Listeria spp. (including L.mono)
Total participants reporting for Listeria spp. (including L.mono)
122
Participants reporting correctly
118 (97%)
L.monocytogenes Total participants reporting for L.monocytogenes
148
Participants reporting correctly
145 (98%)
The data in FEPTU reports is confidential
Page 3 of 20
Printed at 14:20 on Thursday, 30 November, 2017
Salmonella spp. Total participants reporting for Salmonella spp.
171
Participants reporting correctly
167 (98%)
Clostridium perfringens Total participants reporting for Clostridium perfringens
128
Total participants enumerating Clostridium perfringens
125
Participants reporting a low censored value
4
Participants reporting a high censored value
1
Assigned value (participants' median)
1.6x10⁴ cfu g⁻¹ (4.2 log₁₀)
Uncertainty of assigned value (U(Xpt)=log₁₀ cfu g⁻¹)
0.02
No. of outlying counts
11 (9 low / 2 high)
Participants mean
1.5x10⁴ cfu g⁻¹ (4.18 log₁₀)
Standard deviation of participants results *
0.22 log₁₀ cfu g⁻¹
FEPTU QC medians
▪
ISO 7937
2.4x10⁴ cfu g⁻¹ (4.38 log₁₀)
Aerobic colony count Total participants reporting for Aerobic colony count
172
Assigned value (participants' median)
7.8x10⁴ cfu g⁻¹ (4.89 log₁₀)
Uncertainty of assigned value (U(Xpt)=log₁₀ cfu g⁻¹)
0.01
No. of outlying counts
13 (9 low / 4 high)
Participants mean
7.5x10⁴ cfu g⁻¹ (4.88 log₁₀)
Standard deviation of participants results *
0.16 log₁₀ cfu g⁻¹
FEPTU QC median
9.6x10⁴ cfu g⁻¹ (4.98 log₁₀)
Escherichia coli Total participants reporting for Escherichia coli
166
Assigned value (participants' median)
8.0x10³ cfu g⁻¹ (3.9 log₁₀)
Uncertainty of assigned value (U(Xpt)=log₁₀ cfu g⁻¹)
0.04
No. of outlying counts
27 (15 low / 12 high)
Participants mean
6.9x10³ cfu g⁻¹ (3.84 log₁₀)
Standard deviation of participants results *
0.44 log₁₀ cfu g⁻¹
FEPTU QC median
7.9x10³ cfu g⁻¹ (3.9 log₁₀)
Total sent samples
180
Non-returns
1
Not examined
4
The fixed standard deviation value (σpt value) used for calculation of the z-scores is 0.35 for all parameters. * Robust S* based on median absolute deviation about the participants' median (MADe).
The data in FEPTU reports is confidential
Page 4 of 20
Printed at 14:20 on Thursday, 30 November, 2017
Sample: S0634 Contents:
Listeria monocytogenes 90 (wild strain), Listeria seeligeri 8.3x10² (wild strain), Salmonella Crewe 11:z :1,5 37 (wild strain), Clostridium sporogenes 5.4x10³ (wild strain), Nocardia farcinica 1.3x10³ (wild strain), Staphylococcus capitis 2.4x10³ (wild strain)
All levels are presented as colony forming units (cfu) per ml reconstituted sample All levels are presented as colony forming units (cfu) per ml reconstituted sample
Expected Results: Examination
Expected Result
Listeria spp. (including L.mono)
Detected in 25g
L.monocytogenes
Detected in 25g
Salmonella spp.
Detected in 25g
Score
Z-score
4.70
4.63-4.70
4.58-4.62
4.54-4.57
4.50-4.53
4.45-4.49
4.41-4.44
4.37-4.40
4.32-4.36
4.28-4.31
4.24-4.27
4.19-4.23
4.15-4.18
4.11-4.14
4.06-4.10
4.02-4.05
3.98-4.01
3.93-3.97
3.89-3.92
3.85-3.88
3.80-3.84
3.76-3.79
0 5.39
5.32-5.39
5.27-5.31
5.23-5.26
5.19-5.22
5.14-5.18
5.10-5.13
5.05-5.09
5.01-5.04
4.97-5.00
4.92-4.96
4.88-4.91
4.84-4.87
4.79-4.83
4.75-4.78
4.71-4.74
4.66-4.70
4.62-4.65
4.58-4.61
4.53-4.57
4.49-4.52
4.45-4.48
0 4.42
-1
Outlying results
Outlying results 2.91-3.08
3.90 Participant Median (log 10 cfu g ) 3.90 FEPTU Median (log10 cfu g ) -1
4.40-4.42
Outlying results
25
4.42
3.09-3.14
Outlying results
Outlying results 2.91-3.08
-1
4.40-4.42
Outlying results
20
3.90 Participant Median (log 10 cfu g ) 3.90 FEPTU Median (log10 cfu g ) -1
4.11
4.04-4.11
4.00-4.03
3.96-3.99
3.91-3.95
3.87-3.90
3.83-3.86
3.79-3.82
3.75-3.78
3.71-3.74
3.67-3.70
3.62-3.66
3.58-3.61
3.54-3.57
3.50-3.53
3.46-3.49
3.42-3.45
3.37-3.41
3.33-3.36
3.29-3.32
3.25-3.28
3.21-3.24
3.17-3.20
3.12-3.16
4.11
4.04-4.11
4.00-4.03
3.96-3.99
3.91-3.95
3.87-3.90
3.83-3.86
3.79-3.82
3.75-3.78
3.71-3.74
3.67-3.70
3.62-3.66
3.58-3.61
3.54-3.57
3.50-3.53
3.46-3.49
3.42-3.45
3.37-3.41
3.33-3.36
3.29-3.32
3.25-3.28
3.21-3.24
3.17-3.20
3.12-3.16
0
Standard Scheme Distribution Number: 298
Sample Numbers: S0633, S0634
Distribution Date: Results Due: Report Date:
October 2017 10 November 2017 30 November 2017
Samples prepared and quality control tested by:
Angela Appea Richard Borrill Thomas Harper Zak Prior Judith Spellar Aneta Stranc Lili Tsegaye
Data analysed by:
Manchari Rajkumar Nita Patel
Report compiled by:
Manchari Rajkumar Nita Patel
Authorised by:
Nita Patel
This report must not be reproduced without permission of the organisers. Public Health England Food and Environmental Proficiency Testing Unit (FEPTU) 61 Colindale Avenue London NW9 5EQ Tel: +44 (0)20 8327 7119 Fax: +44 (0)20 8200 8264 Email: [email protected] The data in FEPTU reports is confidential
Page 1 of 20
Printed at 14:20 on Thursday, 30 November, 2017
For further information on the scheme please refer to: Scheme Guide: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/food-and-water-proficiency-testing-schemes-scheme-guide Guide to Scoring and Statistics: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/food-and-water-proficiency-testing-schemes-scoring-systems-and-statistics
General guidance for z-scores: Participants' enumeration results are converted into z-scores using the following formula:
Z = (xi -Xpt ) σpt
xi Xpt
= participants' result (expressed as a log 10 value) = assigned value (participants' consensus median (expressed as a log 10 value))
σpt
= the fixed standard deviation for the examination (calculated by FEPTU)
The σpt-value expresses the acceptable difference between the individual participant 's result and the participants' consensus median. The σpt-value used for calculating z-scores for all parameters in the Standard Scheme is 0.35. A guide to interpreting z-scores follows, although laboratories must interpret their scores in the context of their own laboratory situation: z = -1.99 to +1.99 z = -2 to -2.99 or +2 to +2.99 z= < -3.00 or > + 3.00
satisfactory questionable unsatisfactory
It is usually recommended that z-scores exceeding +/-2 are investigated to establish the possible cause. rule, PHE recommends that all questionable and unsatisfactory results are investigated.
As a general
FEPTU Quality control: To demonstrate homogeneity of the sample, a minimum of 10 freeze-dried vials, selected randomly from a batch, are tested in duplicate for parameters requiring enumeration and 10 freeze-dried vials are examined for pathogen detection.
To demonstrate stability of the sample, a minimum of nine vials, selected randomly from a batch, are examined throughout the distribution period, either for enumeration or pathogen detection. FEPTU results are determined using methods based on ISO methods and are included in the 'intended results' letters which provide guidance for participants regarding the assigned values. The FEPTU results are used for guidance in the preliminary intended results notification, letters are posted on the website immediately after every distribution; electronic notification of their availability is sent to all participants Refer to section 17.0 of the Scheme Guide if you have experienced difficulties with any of the examinations . https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/food-and-water-proficiency-testing-schemes-scheme-guide
All participants are reminded that reporting an incorrect or incomplete identification of pathogens from food samples could have serious public health implications. Similarly, the levels of micro-organisms reported in the sample may affect the subsequent outcome for the product. Participants are reminded that the purpose of scoring is to draw attention to incorrect or outlying results. Participants who report outlying results for enumerations on single occasions only should not be alarmed, although they should still assess the reason(s) for the outlying result. The results, as summarised in the performance assessment sheet included in this report, provide a more effective indication of on-going problems with food microbiology examinations.
The bar charts in this report are compiled using the processes outlined in the Guide to Scoring Systems and Statistics for the allocation of PHE scores. Z-scores are included on the sample-specific pages only; the relevant sections will be left blank if a z-score does not apply. Please contact FEPTU staff for advice and information: Repeat samples
Carmen Gomes or Kermin Daruwalla
Data Analysis
Nita Patel or Manchari Rajkumar
Microbiological advice
Nita Patel or Zak Prior
General comments and complaints
Nita Patel or Zak Prior
Scheme consultants
Melody Greenwood and Julie E. Russell
Scheme Co-ordinator
Nita Patel
Tel: Fax: Email:
+44 (0)20 8327 7119 +44 (0)20 8200 8264 [email protected]
FEPTU's website
Accreditation: PHE Food EQA Scheme for Standard is accredited by the United Kingdom Accreditation Service (UKAS) to ISO/IEC 17043:2010.
0006 The data in FEPTU reports is confidential
Page 2 of 20
Printed at 14:20 on Thursday, 30 November, 2017
Sample: S0633 Contents:
Salmonella Essen 4,12: g,m 47 (wild strain), Clostridium perfringens 2.4x10⁴ (wild strain), Escherichia coli 7.9x10³ (wild strain), Lactobacillus paracasei 5.9x10⁴ (wild strain)
All levels are presented as colony forming units (cfu) per ml reconstituted sample All levels are presented as colony forming units (cfu) per ml reconstituted sample
Expected Results: Examination
Expected Result
Listeria spp. (including L.mono)
Not Detected in 25g
L.monocytogenes
Not Detected in 25g
Your Result
Score
Z-score
Detected in 25g
Salmonella spp. Clostridium perfringens
5.1x10³ - 5.1x10⁴ cfu g ⁻¹
Aerobic colony count
2.5x10⁴ - 2.5x10⁵ cfu g ⁻¹
Escherichia coli
1.2x10³ - 2.5x10⁴ cfu g ⁻¹
Listeria spp. (including L.mono)
Total participants reporting for Listeria spp. (including L.mono)
122
Participants reporting correctly
118 (97%)
L.monocytogenes Total participants reporting for L.monocytogenes
148
Participants reporting correctly
145 (98%)
The data in FEPTU reports is confidential
Page 3 of 20
Printed at 14:20 on Thursday, 30 November, 2017
Salmonella spp. Total participants reporting for Salmonella spp.
171
Participants reporting correctly
167 (98%)
Clostridium perfringens Total participants reporting for Clostridium perfringens
128
Total participants enumerating Clostridium perfringens
125
Participants reporting a low censored value
4
Participants reporting a high censored value
1
Assigned value (participants' median)
1.6x10⁴ cfu g⁻¹ (4.2 log₁₀)
Uncertainty of assigned value (U(Xpt)=log₁₀ cfu g⁻¹)
0.02
No. of outlying counts
11 (9 low / 2 high)
Participants mean
1.5x10⁴ cfu g⁻¹ (4.18 log₁₀)
Standard deviation of participants results *
0.22 log₁₀ cfu g⁻¹
FEPTU QC medians
▪
ISO 7937
2.4x10⁴ cfu g⁻¹ (4.38 log₁₀)
Aerobic colony count Total participants reporting for Aerobic colony count
172
Assigned value (participants' median)
7.8x10⁴ cfu g⁻¹ (4.89 log₁₀)
Uncertainty of assigned value (U(Xpt)=log₁₀ cfu g⁻¹)
0.01
No. of outlying counts
13 (9 low / 4 high)
Participants mean
7.5x10⁴ cfu g⁻¹ (4.88 log₁₀)
Standard deviation of participants results *
0.16 log₁₀ cfu g⁻¹
FEPTU QC median
9.6x10⁴ cfu g⁻¹ (4.98 log₁₀)
Escherichia coli Total participants reporting for Escherichia coli
166
Assigned value (participants' median)
8.0x10³ cfu g⁻¹ (3.9 log₁₀)
Uncertainty of assigned value (U(Xpt)=log₁₀ cfu g⁻¹)
0.04
No. of outlying counts
27 (15 low / 12 high)
Participants mean
6.9x10³ cfu g⁻¹ (3.84 log₁₀)
Standard deviation of participants results *
0.44 log₁₀ cfu g⁻¹
FEPTU QC median
7.9x10³ cfu g⁻¹ (3.9 log₁₀)
Total sent samples
180
Non-returns
1
Not examined
4
The fixed standard deviation value (σpt value) used for calculation of the z-scores is 0.35 for all parameters. * Robust S* based on median absolute deviation about the participants' median (MADe).
The data in FEPTU reports is confidential
Page 4 of 20
Printed at 14:20 on Thursday, 30 November, 2017
Sample: S0634 Contents:
Listeria monocytogenes 90 (wild strain), Listeria seeligeri 8.3x10² (wild strain), Salmonella Crewe 11:z :1,5 37 (wild strain), Clostridium sporogenes 5.4x10³ (wild strain), Nocardia farcinica 1.3x10³ (wild strain), Staphylococcus capitis 2.4x10³ (wild strain)
All levels are presented as colony forming units (cfu) per ml reconstituted sample All levels are presented as colony forming units (cfu) per ml reconstituted sample
Expected Results: Examination
Expected Result
Listeria spp. (including L.mono)
Detected in 25g
L.monocytogenes
Detected in 25g
Salmonella spp.
Detected in 25g
Score
Z-score
4.70
4.63-4.70
4.58-4.62
4.54-4.57
4.50-4.53
4.45-4.49
4.41-4.44
4.37-4.40
4.32-4.36
4.28-4.31
4.24-4.27
4.19-4.23
4.15-4.18
4.11-4.14
4.06-4.10
4.02-4.05
3.98-4.01
3.93-3.97
3.89-3.92
3.85-3.88
3.80-3.84
3.76-3.79
0 5.39
5.32-5.39
5.27-5.31
5.23-5.26
5.19-5.22
5.14-5.18
5.10-5.13
5.05-5.09
5.01-5.04
4.97-5.00
4.92-4.96
4.88-4.91
4.84-4.87
4.79-4.83
4.75-4.78
4.71-4.74
4.66-4.70
4.62-4.65
4.58-4.61
4.53-4.57
4.49-4.52
4.45-4.48
0 4.42
-1
Outlying results
Outlying results 2.91-3.08
3.90 Participant Median (log 10 cfu g ) 3.90 FEPTU Median (log10 cfu g ) -1
4.40-4.42
Outlying results
25
4.42
3.09-3.14
Outlying results
Outlying results 2.91-3.08
-1
4.40-4.42
Outlying results
20
3.90 Participant Median (log 10 cfu g ) 3.90 FEPTU Median (log10 cfu g ) -1
4.11
4.04-4.11
4.00-4.03
3.96-3.99
3.91-3.95
3.87-3.90
3.83-3.86
3.79-3.82
3.75-3.78
3.71-3.74
3.67-3.70
3.62-3.66
3.58-3.61
3.54-3.57
3.50-3.53
3.46-3.49
3.42-3.45
3.37-3.41
3.33-3.36
3.29-3.32
3.25-3.28
3.21-3.24
3.17-3.20
3.12-3.16
4.11
4.04-4.11
4.00-4.03
3.96-3.99
3.91-3.95
3.87-3.90
3.83-3.86
3.79-3.82
3.75-3.78
3.71-3.74
3.67-3.70
3.62-3.66
3.58-3.61
3.54-3.57
3.50-3.53
3.46-3.49
3.42-3.45
3.37-3.41
3.33-3.36
3.29-3.32
3.25-3.28
3.21-3.24
3.17-3.20
3.12-3.16
0
