The effects of surface charge and hydrophobicity on anodic biofilm formation, community composition and current generation in bioelectrochemical systems Kun Guo, Stefano Freguia, Paul G. Dennis, Xin Chen, Bogdan C. Donose, Jurg Keller, J. Justin Gooding, Korneel Rabaey
Figure S2. Phylogenetic neighbourhood of OTUs present at more than 1% relative abundance in this study (shaded) relative to the most similar full length 16S rRNA gene sequences in the greengenes database. The representative sequences for each OTU was inserted into the greengenes tree by maximum parsimony using Arb.
S2
0.18
-CH3 -OH -SO3
Current (mA)
0.12
+
-N (CH3)3
0.06
0.00
-0.06
-0.12 -0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0.0
0.2
Potential (V vs Ag/AgCl)
Figure S3. CVs for each of the modified electrodes in sterile media without acetate before inoculations (scan rate: 10mV/s) Table S1. Tukey's Honestly Significant Difference (HSD) test of startup time and current output, Startup time Current output –OH vs –N+(CH3)3
ns
**
–OH vs –SO3–
ns
*
*
**
–N (CH3)3 vs –CH3
*
***
–OH vs –CH3
*
***
–SO3 vs –N+(CH3)3
ns
***
–
–SO3 vs –CH3 +
Note: P > 0.05 (ns), P < 0.05 (*), P < 0.01 (**), P < 0.001 (***)
S3
Figure S4. The correlations of amount of biomass and current density
0.18
Bare
0.14
2
Current density (mA/cm )
0.16
0.12
+
-N (CH3)3
0.10 0.08 0.06 0.04 -
0.02
-SO3
0.00 0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Time (d)
Figure S5. Current output over time of BE cells with bare GC electrode and modified GC electrodes. Surface modified by cyclic voltammetry and the coating density was around 7 mC/cm2.