Towards Silicon Anodes for Next-Generation Lithium Ion Batteries: A ...

Report 6 Downloads 77 Views
Towards Silicon Anodes for Next-Generation Lithium Ion Batteries: A Comparative Performance Study of Various Polymer Binders and Silicon Nanopowders Christoph Erk,†,‡,* Torsten Brezesinski,† Heino Sommer,†,‡ Reinhard Schneider,# and Jürgen Janek†,+,* †

Institute of Nanotechnology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Platz

1, 76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany, and ‡BASF SE, 67056 Ludwigshafen, Germany, and #Laboratory for Electron Microscopy, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Engesserstr. 7, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany, and +Institute of Physical Chemistry, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 58, 35392 Giessen, Germany.

*E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected].

1

Figure S1. Top view SEM images of electrodes comprising Si-50 (Alfa Aesar) silicon nanopowder and various binders. From these images, it can be clearly seen that the morphology of the different electrode tapes is very similar.

2

Figure S2. Lithiation capacity as a function of cycle number for electrodes made from Si-50 (Alfa Aesar) silicon nanopowder and PEO polymer binder.

Table S1. Summarized cycling data for electrodes made from Si-50 (Alfa Aesar) silicon nanopowder and various binders.

Binder

1st cycle lithiation capacity (mAh/gSi) FEC

EC

1st cycle irreversible capacity (%)

Capacity retention after cycle no. 5 (%)

Capacity retention after cycle no. 33 (%)

Capacity retention after cycle no. 42 (%)

Capacity retention after cycle no. 59 (%)

FEC

EC

FE C

EC

FE C

EC

F E C

EC

FE C

EC

AA (medium visc.)

3790 3660

19

13

95

95

68

49

66

46

62

40

PAA (450.000)

3790 3780

13

11

92

91

80

61

75

56

73

43

PVA (Selvol 425)

4180 4110

14

10

83

83

68

53

64

46

59

33

CMC

3650 3780

24

11

77

82

47

31

43

28

43

23

3

(250.000) PVDF (Kynar HSV 900)

4090 4060

43

29

92

92

70

51

68

44

52

38

Figure S3. 1st cycle discharge profiles in the voltage range between 1.8 V and 0.1 V vs. Li/Li+ for electrodes made from Si-50 (Alfa Aesar) silicon nanopowder and various binders. (a) ECbased electrolyte. (b) FEC-based electrolyte.

4

Figure S4. Typical XRD patterns for Si-50 (Alfa Aesar) and Si-100 (Aldrich) silicon nanopowders. Debye Scherrer analysis provides average crystallite sizes of 47 nm and 78 nm, respectively.

5

Figure S5. XPS detail spectra (black curves) of Si-50 (Alfa Aesar; a, b) and Si-100 (Aldrich; c, d) silicon nanopowders. (a, c) Si 2p spectra. (b, d) O 1s spectra. Blue, red and orange curves are fits to the data while green curves correspond to the sum of the peak fits. The Shirley method was applied to subtract backgrounds.

6

Figure S6. N2-adsorption/desorption isotherms for Si-50 (Alfa Aesar; a) and Si-100 (Aldrich; b) silicon nanopowders. From these data, we obtain BET surface areas of 32 m2/g and 35 m2/g for Si-50 and Si-100, respectively.

7