UN Security Council Resolution 1540

Report 3 Downloads 62 Views
United Nations Security Council Resolution 1540: Building Capacity to Counter Terrorism

OVERVIEW Background UNSCR 1540 Obligations Impediments to 1540 Implementation Lessons Learned Nunn-Lugar/CNP Next 100 Project Addressing roadblocks Conclusions/Lessons Learned

BACKGROUND President Bush’s Address to the UN (2003) A.Q. Khan and Black Market Networks (2003) UN Security Council Resolution 1540 (2004) UN Security Council Resolution 1673 (2006)

UNSCR 1540 OBLIGATIONS (1) Refrain from supporting non-state actors (2) Prosecute WMD activities by non-state actors (3a) Monitor WMD production/storage/transport (3b) Secure WMD facilities (3c) Control borders and detect trafficking (3d) Establish and enforce export controls (4) Present a compliance report within six months

ROADBLOCKS/RESPONSES Legitimacy

• UNSCR “legislating” unfunded mandates • Existing NPT Commitments

Low prioritization by developing states • Increase participation incentives • Create consequences for failing to comply

Inadequate capacity for implementation

• Further engage NGOs/IGOs for expertise and financing • Expand involvement by regional organizations and states

Mismatch of offers & requests

• Streamline request process • Identify standards and “best” practices

NUNN-LUGAR Two-year research project: “Getting Further, Faster” publication Synthesis of 15 years experience: • Underutilized and underappreciated toolkit for 1540 implementation • Buy-in and ownership of the objectives • Sustainability requires “development” tools of institution and capacity-building

Next 100 Project: Methodology “Donor” States. • Bridging the development – nonproliferation divide

“Recipient” States. • Aligning development priorities with items related to 1540 implementation

Project 24-month Objectives. • Minimum of four pilot projects that demonstrate sustainable implementation of 1540

ROADBLOCKS: CREATING A VIRTUOUS CIRCLE? Legitimacy: • 1540 vs. CWC • Cases: Egypt and Indonesia

Building Capacity: • SALW and WMD. • Legal Assistance – commercial law/export controls

Shifting Priorities and Perceptions: • North and South

CONCLUSIONS Lessons Learned • Donor Offers: Gap between development and nonproliferation communities/”whole of government” responses • Recipient Needs: Capacity, Priority (Legitimacy) – Facilitating a dialogue • Avoiding Duplication, maximizing synergies: 1373 CT, 1540 NP, PSI • 1540 Committee vs. State Responsibility?

BACKUP SLIDES

COUNTER-TERRORISM CAPACITY BUILDING Assessment Criteria 1373 Category

Financial Asset Controls Law Enforcement Territorial Control

ContexContextual Issues

Current Nat’ Nat’l CT Focus & Status, incl. LegLegislation

Nat’ Nat’l ConsenConsensus & Dialogue

TransparTransparency, ency, AccountAccountability, & Human Rights Compliance

Capacity

CoordinaCoordination, tion, Coherence, & Int’ Int’l CooperaCooperation

Linkages to Other Programs and Sectors

CTCB Needs

NONPROLIFERATION CAPACITY BUILDING Assessment Criteria 1540 Category Anti-Trafficking Measures (incl. Financial Controls) Legal Framework Territorial Control

ContexContextual Issues

Current Nat’ Nat’l Nonprol. Nonprol. Priorities & Status, incl. LegLegislation

TransparTransparency, ency, AccountAccountability, & (Human Rights Compliance)

Capacity

CoordinaCoordination, tion, Coherence, & Int’ Int’l CooperaCooperation

Linkages to Other Programs and Sectors

Nonprol. Nonprol. CapacityCapacityBuilding Needs