US DOE Webinar Series Fuel Cell Technologies Office EERE Fuel
2
•
•
3
1.70
0.42
0.20
0.70 0.39
0.43 2.00 5.50
4
1.75
5
Flight Statistics Flight 1
5/18/2013
16 min
First Flight
Flight 2
5/31/2013
18 min
First Autonomous Operation
Flight 3
6/15/2013
32 s
ESC Failure, Ditch
Flight 4
8/10/2013
3.5 min
Dead stick Landing
Flight 5
9/28/2013
22 min
Cold and wet
Flights 6-7
10/5/2013
46 min
Great Success
Flights 8-9
11/13-2/14 ~50 min
Flights 10-14 2/14-5/14
6
2 hr
Success switch logger Full load flight tests
• • Liquid hydrogen production
7
+
Patent pending storage system
+
PEM fuel cell powerplant
= New capabilities and markets
US DOE Webinar Series Fuel Cell Technologies Office
EERE Fuel Cell Technologies Office 6 November 2014
8 | Fuel Cell Technologies Program Source: US DOE 2/10/2015
2014 and 2015 Hydrogen Student Design Contests eere.energy.gov
Designing a Drop-in Hydrogen Fueling Station U.S. Department of Energy Webinar November 6, 2014 In this presentation… 1. Customer Considerations 2. Liquid H2 Delivery 3. Station Design 4. User Interface 5. Safety Features 6. Site Logistics 7. Economic Analysis
9
Full report available at: http://hydrogencontest.org/2014.asp
Design with the Customer in Mind Low Capital Cost
No Maintenance
Low Operating Cost
Minimal Footprint
Public Safety
Public Appeal
10
Liquid hydrogen is superior near term • • • • •
Lowest cost Low energy demand Minimizes equipment 4 times the density of delivered gas Existing infrastructure 80-90% of all non-pipeline H2 delivered by cryogenic liquid tankers.1
1 Technology
Image from www.worldindustrialreporter.com
Transition Corporation (TTC), Hydrogen and Fuel Cells: The U.S. Market Report, 11 (22 March 2010)
100% 50% 65% 0% 100% 25% 75%
100% 90% 93%
12
We have a site & plan
•Located on WSU campus •Existing gasoline station on-site •Easy access for vehicles and refuelers •Meets Washington Administrative Code •Fire resistant walls reduce setback distances
Top View Pump 1
Pump 2
Equipment 13
¼ cost of current stations • Explicit and implicit costs considered: – Fixed cost = $423,000 (all equipment) – Monthly costs = $735 (power, water, maintenance – demand dependent) – Discount rate of 6.25% – 10 year life span Gaseous Storage $77,100
• Price (P) model [$/kg] – Monthly Demand (D) – Rate of Return (RR)
Compressor $54,000
LH2 Storage $72,907
Misc. $20,603
Cooling $52,604
Dispensing $94,833 Monitoring Safety $26,577 $23,936
14
Competitive with gasoline Required Return
Monthly Demand (kg)
Price ($/kg)
Price per 5 kg or 300 miles ($)
10%
3000
11.31
56.55
30%
3000
11.62
58.10
10%
6000
9.62
48.10
30%
6000
9.78
48.90
0.0 16
Required Rate of Return 0.4 0.2
14 Price
($/kg)
12 10 2000
3000
4000 5000 Demand per Month
(kg)
6000
15
2014 CONTEST WINNERS 16
Development Efforts • Partnership with GP Strategies on a DOE proposal for Cryogenic Thermal Compressor (CTC) (in review) – Provisional patent on CTC
• Designing single dispenser prototype station – Could refuel shuttle bus on WSU campus
• In negotiations with other companies to develop prototype station 17
Proposed Space: TFRB 108-113
18
19
20
21
22
CREST: A space for Research, Teaching, & Service
23
H H Y P E R
24
Thank you.
drogen roperties for nergy esearch
•
•
3
1.70
0.42
0.20
0.70 0.39
0.43 2.00 5.50
4
1.75
5
Flight Statistics Flight 1
5/18/2013
16 min
First Flight
Flight 2
5/31/2013
18 min
First Autonomous Operation
Flight 3
6/15/2013
32 s
ESC Failure, Ditch
Flight 4
8/10/2013
3.5 min
Dead stick Landing
Flight 5
9/28/2013
22 min
Cold and wet
Flights 6-7
10/5/2013
46 min
Great Success
Flights 8-9
11/13-2/14 ~50 min
Flights 10-14 2/14-5/14
6
2 hr
Success switch logger Full load flight tests
• • Liquid hydrogen production
7
+
Patent pending storage system
+
PEM fuel cell powerplant
= New capabilities and markets
US DOE Webinar Series Fuel Cell Technologies Office
EERE Fuel Cell Technologies Office 6 November 2014
8 | Fuel Cell Technologies Program Source: US DOE 2/10/2015
2014 and 2015 Hydrogen Student Design Contests eere.energy.gov
Designing a Drop-in Hydrogen Fueling Station U.S. Department of Energy Webinar November 6, 2014 In this presentation… 1. Customer Considerations 2. Liquid H2 Delivery 3. Station Design 4. User Interface 5. Safety Features 6. Site Logistics 7. Economic Analysis
9
Full report available at: http://hydrogencontest.org/2014.asp
Design with the Customer in Mind Low Capital Cost
No Maintenance
Low Operating Cost
Minimal Footprint
Public Safety
Public Appeal
10
Liquid hydrogen is superior near term • • • • •
Lowest cost Low energy demand Minimizes equipment 4 times the density of delivered gas Existing infrastructure 80-90% of all non-pipeline H2 delivered by cryogenic liquid tankers.1
1 Technology
Image from www.worldindustrialreporter.com
Transition Corporation (TTC), Hydrogen and Fuel Cells: The U.S. Market Report, 11 (22 March 2010)
100% 50% 65% 0% 100% 25% 75%
100% 90% 93%
12
We have a site & plan
•Located on WSU campus •Existing gasoline station on-site •Easy access for vehicles and refuelers •Meets Washington Administrative Code •Fire resistant walls reduce setback distances
Top View Pump 1
Pump 2
Equipment 13
¼ cost of current stations • Explicit and implicit costs considered: – Fixed cost = $423,000 (all equipment) – Monthly costs = $735 (power, water, maintenance – demand dependent) – Discount rate of 6.25% – 10 year life span Gaseous Storage $77,100
• Price (P) model [$/kg] – Monthly Demand (D) – Rate of Return (RR)
Compressor $54,000
LH2 Storage $72,907
Misc. $20,603
Cooling $52,604
Dispensing $94,833 Monitoring Safety $26,577 $23,936
14
Competitive with gasoline Required Return
Monthly Demand (kg)
Price ($/kg)
Price per 5 kg or 300 miles ($)
10%
3000
11.31
56.55
30%
3000
11.62
58.10
10%
6000
9.62
48.10
30%
6000
9.78
48.90
0.0 16
Required Rate of Return 0.4 0.2
14 Price
($/kg)
12 10 2000
3000
4000 5000 Demand per Month
(kg)
6000
15
2014 CONTEST WINNERS 16
Development Efforts • Partnership with GP Strategies on a DOE proposal for Cryogenic Thermal Compressor (CTC) (in review) – Provisional patent on CTC
• Designing single dispenser prototype station – Could refuel shuttle bus on WSU campus
• In negotiations with other companies to develop prototype station 17
Proposed Space: TFRB 108-113
18
19
20
21
22
CREST: A space for Research, Teaching, & Service
23
H H Y P E R
24
Thank you.
drogen roperties for nergy esearch
