Monkfish Assessment Update 2016

Report 2 Downloads 29 Views
Monkfish Assessment Update 2016 NEFMC SSC August 10, 2016

Monkfish • Distributed NC-Canada • Two management areas

U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 2

Biological Uncertainties • Stock structure • mtDNA studies: no stock delineation • Microsatellites: possible delineation in Mid-Atlantic

U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 3

Biological Uncertainties • Growth • 2016: aging method invalidated • Incorrect # rings counted at margin in >half of fish • Long-standing questions about early growth

• Growth model incorrect • Model not updated

U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 4

2016 Monkfish Update Terms of Reference • • • • •

TOR 1: Update catch statistics TOR 2: Update fishery-independent indices TOR 3: Review evidence for biological changes TOR 4: Compare annual ACLs with catches TOR 5: Analysis to support SSC decisions

U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 5

TOR 1. Update catch estimates, including landings, discard, size composition of catch

• Landings

U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 6

TOR 1. Catch statistics – Gear type • North landings – trawls

South landings – gillnets

U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 7

TOR 1. Catch statistics – Gear type • Overall - trawl and gillnet landings equivalent

U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 8

TOR 1. Catch statistics - Discards

U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 9

TOR 1. Catch statistics • North (2013-2015) 14%

South (2013-2015) 25%

U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 10

TOR 1. Catch length composition - North North - Kept Note: x and y axis scales vary

North - Discarded

Dredge

Gillnet

Trawl

2012

Kept

Discarded 2013

2014

2015

U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 11

TOR 1. Catch length composition - South South - Kept Note: x and y axis scales vary

South - Discarded

Dredge

Gillnet

Trawl

2012

Discarded

Kept 2013

2014

2015

U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 12

TOR 2. Fishery-independent indices • Update fishery-independent indices, including recruitment indices and length composition of survey catches

U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 13

TOR 2. Survey indices - North • Bigelow time series Biomass

Abundance Abundance

Biomass NEFSC Fall Abundance Index (#/tow)

10 8 6 4 2 0 2009

2010

12

Biomass Index (kg/tow)

Spring

12

2011

2012

2013

2014

8 6 4 2

2010

2011

2012

8 6 4 2

2010

6

NEFSC Spring

10

0 2009

NEFSC Fall

10

0 2009

2015

Abundance Index (#/tow)

Fall

Biomass Index (kg/tow)

12

2013

2014

2015

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2013

2014

2015

NEFSC Spring

5 4 3 2 1 0 2009

2010

2011

2012

U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 14

TOR 2. Survey indices - North • All surveys

Abundance

Biomass

U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 15

TOR 2. Survey indices - South • Bigelow time series South

Biomass

Abundance

Biomass

Abundance

NEFSC Fall

5 4 3 2 1 0 2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

3

2

1

2010

2011

2012

20 15 10 5

2010

3

NEFSC Spring

4

0 2009

NEFSC Fall

25

0 2009

2015

Abundance Index (#/tow)

Biomass Index (kg/tow)

5

Spring

30

Abundance Index (#/tow)

Fall

Biomass Index (kg/tow)

6

2013

2014

2015

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2013

2014

2015

NEFSC Spring

3 2 2 1 1 0 2009

2010

2011

2012

U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 16

TOR 2. Survey indices - South • All surveys

U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 17

TOR 2. Surveys – 2015 recruitment event • South 2015 April 2 June 10

Sept 20

NEFSC Spring

NEFSC Scallop

VIMS scallop dredge survey 2015

NEFSC Fall

U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 18

TOR 2. Surveys – 2015 recruitment event • South NEFSC Surveys

Spring 2015

Fall 2016

Spring 2016

May 2, 2016

U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 1

TOR 2. Survey indices – recruitment event North 2015

NEFSC Spring

April 24 Aug 1

Summer Shrimp

May 26, 2016

Oct 20

NEFSC Fall

NEFSC Spring

U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Pag

TOR 2. Survey indices - Recruitment • Recruitment indices North

South

U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 21

TOR 2. Survey indices – NEFSC Spring • Spring 2016

U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 22

TOR 3. Review evidence for biological changes • Distribution changes • Movies • Temperature • Depth • Condition factors

U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 23

TOR 4: Compare ACLs with catches - North • ACL vs. annual catch

• TAL vs. FY landings Percent of TAL

U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 24

TOR 4: Compare ACLs with catches - South

• ACL vs. annual catch

• TAL vs. FY landings Percent of TAL

U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 25

TOR 5. Provide analysis to support SSC • Relative exploitation indices (catch/abundance index) North

South

U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 26

TOR 5. Provide analysis for SSC • Relative exploitation indices (ldgs/43+ index) NEFSC fall survey Biomass-based

Abundance-based

(swept area abundance)

U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 27

TOR 5. Provide analysis for SSC • Method for OFL adjustment (GB cod) • Use trend in recent survey indices to adjust previous catch advice

U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 28

TOR 5. Provide analysis for SSC • Method • Average NEFSC fall and spring surveys, exploitable size (43+ cm) • Smooth indices (Loess, α=0.25) • Regression over last 3 years used to estimate percent change (slope) • Apply percent change to derive new catch advice

U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 29

TOR 5. Provide analysis for SSC Spring and Fall Exploitable Biomass Indices

North

South

U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 30

TOR 5. Provide analysis for SSC Loess-smoothed spring-fall average 43+ indices

U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 31

TOR 5. Provide analysis for SSC Trends

North: 2% increase South: 13% decrease

U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 32