park shirlington - Arlingtonva

Report 2 Downloads 109 Views
PARK SHIRLINGTON Rezoning & Final Site Plan (SP #433) SPRC #1 May 19, 2014

Aaron Shriber DCPHD—Planning Division

Site Location/Existing Conditions • 15.70 acres • 14 buildings • 294 market rate affordable units (18.73 du/ac) • 318 surface parking spaces (1.08 sp/unit) • Garden style apartment complex built in the 1950s (not listed on HRI)

2

Existing Site Characteristics

3

Fort Reynolds • Civil War era fort constructed in 1861 • Designed by the Union Army as a component of the defenses of Washington • Remains of fort are located on the subject site and the adjacent parcel owned by the County 4

Existing Zoning Classification

S-3A

P-S

C-O-1.5

RA14-26

RA6-15

RA14-26

RA14-26

5

General Land Use Plan Designation

Low-Medium Residential

6

Redevelopment Proposal • Rezone site from RA14-26 to RA8-18 • Final Site Plan to redevelop the site with 5 buildings containing 750 dwelling units and 903 parking spaces – 47.77 du/ac – 1.20 sp/unit

• Modifications requested: – Bonus density for the provision of affordable housing units (§15.6.9) • Bonus—25% (142 units) • 100 committed affordable housing units – 13.3% of total units – 70.4% of bonus units attained through affordable housing provision

– Bonus density for the achievement of LEED Silver (Green Building Policy) • Bonus—6.9% (39 units)

7

Proposed Site Layout

Building

Units

Height

Parking

A

88

60.1’/69.44’

113

B

126

52.1’/61.44’

150

C

287

70.07’/79.44’

338

D

141

58.71’/68.05’

91

E

108

56.37’/62.87’

211

Total

750

903 8

Development Comparison

Units

Existing Site (RA14-26) 294 MFD

Density

18.73 du/ac

Bonus Density

N/A

By-Right Potential (RA14-26) 114 SFD; or 195 SFA; or 380 MFD 7.26 du/ac (SFD); or 12.45 du/ac (SFA); or 24.2 du/ac (MFD) N/A

Site Plan Maximum (RA8-18) 570 MFD

Site Plan Proposal (RA8-18) 750 MFD

36.3 du/ac (MFD)

47.77 du/ac (MFD)

varies

181 units (32% bonus)

Height

20.6’

35’

75

70.07

Stories

3

3.5

8

5

Parking

318

404

594

775 req. 903 prov. 827 structured 76 surface

9

10

Issues for Further Discussion Land Use • The General Land Use Plan (GLUP) designation for the site is “Low-Medium” Residential (16-36 du/ac) • The rezoning application requests that the site be reclassified from the RA14-26 zoning district to the RA8-18 zoning district • The site plan redevelopment proposal (through the incorporation of bonus density provisions) exceeds the GLUP’s recommended density for the site • The appropriateness of the rezoning application and resulting density of the site plan proposal will be analyzed to determine compliance with County policies and goals • Site layout, neighborhood transitions and issues of compatibility between the proposed redevelopment and surrounding land uses will be reviewed Housing • The site currently contains 294 market rate affordable housing units • The site plan proposes to provide 100 committed affordable housing units • The loss of approximately 194 affordable housing units will be analyzed to determine compliance with the County’s Housing Goals • An associated tenant-relocation plan will be reviewed to determine appropriate mitigation for assistance to tenants that may be displaced with the proposed redevelopment of the site Historic Preservation • The site contains a portion of Fort Reynolds, a Civil War era fort, which was partially destroyed by construction of the Park Shirlington apartments in the 1950s • An archaeological study will be necessary to determine the location and character of the archaeological significance of the Fort Reynolds remains on the site • Park Shirlington, though not listed in the County’s Historic Resources Inventory, is a good example of garden style apartment buildings from the 1950s and should be documented prior to any demolition activities conducted on the site in association with this redevelopment proposal Transportation • Impacts to 31st Street South and transit capacity will be studied to determine mitigation measures that may be necessary to support the proposed redevelopment of the site • The proposed parking supply will be analyzed to determine the appropriate amount of parking that will be necessary to support the proposed redevelopment

11