Pavement Preservation in Maryland
Pavement Preservation
NATE MOORE PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT MARYLAND DOT STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION [email protected] MAY 2017
State Report
MDOT State Highway Admin 17,117 Lane Miles (23%) 71% of Vehicle Miles 62% Flexible Pavement 37% Composite Pavement 1% PCC Surface $12 Billion Replacement Cost
PAVEMENT & GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN GUIDE • Includes Pavement Preservation • Last Updated June 2016 • Search MD Pavement Design Guide http://www.roads.maryland.gov/Index.aspx?PageId=12
The week after the Nashville Meeting
Biorestor Results
Top Binder from top ¾” of core
Viscosity of Surface per Witczak
http://pavement.engineering.asu.edu/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/12PavementCrackingDistress-Witczak.pdf
http://pavement.engineering.asu.edu/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/12PavementCrackingDistress-Witczak.pdf
http://pavement.engineering.asu.edu/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/12PavementCrackingDistress-Witczak.pdf
http://pavement.engineering.asu.edu/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/12PavementCrackingDistress-Witczak.pdf
Preliminary Forecast Lane Miles
Lane Miles
Treatment
2017
2018
2019
Treatment
2017
2018
2019
Microsurface
25
25
25
Dense Asphalt Overlay
350
300
300
Surface Abrasion
20
10
10
SMA Asphalt Overlay
250
250
200
Crack Seal
350
350
350
Rejuvenator
0
0
5
Ultrathin Bonded Wearing Course
40
50
75
Asphalt Patching
250
250
250
Chip Seal
0
0
5
High Friction Surface Treatment
1
2
3
Concrete Pavement Restoration
5
5
5
Diamond Grinding
3
3
3
Preventive Maintenance Requirements • • • •
Memo from Chief Engineer February 2017 To District Engineers Requiring Teamwork
Preventive Maintenance Requirements
Preventive Maintenance Requirements
Preventive Maintenance Requirements
Preventive Maintenance Requirements
Preventive Maintenance Requirements Goals • 26% of Pavement Preservation Budget for FY 2019 • 30% of Paving Benefit • 62% of Lane Miles for FY 2019
Preventive Maintenance Requirements Goals • 26% of Pavement Preservation Budget for FY 2019 • 30% of Paving Benefit • 62% of Lane Miles for FY 2019
Microsurfacing Friction Performance HPV (High Polish Value) vs. NON-HPV (Carbonate) vs. Microsurface in URBAN ARTERIALS 500
60
450
40
About 15 FN Difference
400
About 45% More Control
300
350
30
250 200
20
150 100
10 0
50 0
10
20 Age
30
40
0
HPV MILES
Miles of Data
Friction Number
50
NON-HPV MILES MICROSURFACE MILES HPV MO URBAN ARTERIALS NON-HPV MO URBAN ARTERIALS MICROSURFACE MO URBAN ARTERIALS
Challenges
Performance Modeling for HPMS measures for TAMP
We’re losing buying power
Integrating Data from multiple sources Crash Data WIM
Data
Material
Source Data
Material
QA Data
Construction
Management Data
Project-Level
Core and FWD Data
Historic
Videolog - 1974 to 2000
Thanks! Questions? Nate Moore Pavement Management [email protected] 443-572-5073
NATE MOORE PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT MARYLAND DOT STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION [email protected] MAY 2017
State Report
MDOT State Highway Admin 17,117 Lane Miles (23%) 71% of Vehicle Miles 62% Flexible Pavement 37% Composite Pavement 1% PCC Surface $12 Billion Replacement Cost
PAVEMENT & GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN GUIDE • Includes Pavement Preservation • Last Updated June 2016 • Search MD Pavement Design Guide http://www.roads.maryland.gov/Index.aspx?PageId=12
The week after the Nashville Meeting
Biorestor Results
Top Binder from top ¾” of core
Viscosity of Surface per Witczak
http://pavement.engineering.asu.edu/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/12PavementCrackingDistress-Witczak.pdf
http://pavement.engineering.asu.edu/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/12PavementCrackingDistress-Witczak.pdf
http://pavement.engineering.asu.edu/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/12PavementCrackingDistress-Witczak.pdf
http://pavement.engineering.asu.edu/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/12PavementCrackingDistress-Witczak.pdf
Preliminary Forecast Lane Miles
Lane Miles
Treatment
2017
2018
2019
Treatment
2017
2018
2019
Microsurface
25
25
25
Dense Asphalt Overlay
350
300
300
Surface Abrasion
20
10
10
SMA Asphalt Overlay
250
250
200
Crack Seal
350
350
350
Rejuvenator
0
0
5
Ultrathin Bonded Wearing Course
40
50
75
Asphalt Patching
250
250
250
Chip Seal
0
0
5
High Friction Surface Treatment
1
2
3
Concrete Pavement Restoration
5
5
5
Diamond Grinding
3
3
3
Preventive Maintenance Requirements • • • •
Memo from Chief Engineer February 2017 To District Engineers Requiring Teamwork
Preventive Maintenance Requirements
Preventive Maintenance Requirements
Preventive Maintenance Requirements
Preventive Maintenance Requirements
Preventive Maintenance Requirements Goals • 26% of Pavement Preservation Budget for FY 2019 • 30% of Paving Benefit • 62% of Lane Miles for FY 2019
Preventive Maintenance Requirements Goals • 26% of Pavement Preservation Budget for FY 2019 • 30% of Paving Benefit • 62% of Lane Miles for FY 2019
Microsurfacing Friction Performance HPV (High Polish Value) vs. NON-HPV (Carbonate) vs. Microsurface in URBAN ARTERIALS 500
60
450
40
About 15 FN Difference
400
About 45% More Control
300
350
30
250 200
20
150 100
10 0
50 0
10
20 Age
30
40
0
HPV MILES
Miles of Data
Friction Number
50
NON-HPV MILES MICROSURFACE MILES HPV MO URBAN ARTERIALS NON-HPV MO URBAN ARTERIALS MICROSURFACE MO URBAN ARTERIALS
Challenges
Performance Modeling for HPMS measures for TAMP
We’re losing buying power
Integrating Data from multiple sources Crash Data WIM
Data
Material
Source Data
Material
QA Data
Construction
Management Data
Project-Level
Core and FWD Data
Historic
Videolog - 1974 to 2000
Thanks! Questions? Nate Moore Pavement Management [email protected] 443-572-5073
