Progress on Utah's State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) for ...
Progress on Utah’s State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) for Special Education 2014-2019
SSIP Baseline Data Analysis 2013-2014 Grades 6-8 SAGE Mathematics Percent Proficient
37.1%
22.2 14.9% 7.1% Non-SWD
SWD
SLD/SLI
Utah State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) 2015 IF Utah implements broad coherent improvement strategies
2019
THEORY OF ACTION High Expectations and Beliefs
Inclusion in grade level core content, assessment, graduation requirements, and CCR plans
THEN Utah’s State-Identified Measureable Result, SIMR
Utah will increase the percentage of students with Specific Learning Disabilities (SLD) or Speech/Language Impairment (SLI) in grades Leadership • Active 6-8 who are proficient on Engagement of All School Personnel • the SAGE mathematics Data-Driven Decision-Making • Preservice assessment by and Inservice Professional Learning • 11.11% over a Partnerships and Collaboration • IEP Team 5-year period. Decisions • Evidence-Based Practices •Fiscal Support
Content Knowledge and Effective Instruction
Math content and pedagogy to provide effective instruction through UDL and evidence-based practices
Multi-Tiered System of Supports Secondary Settings Infrastructure, Scale, Fidelity
SIMR Achievement Gap 22.22% 11.11% Goal Actual
2.22%
Goal: Cut Achievement Gap in Half over 5 Years
1.6%
2.22%
1.24%
2.22%
2.22%
2.22%
2014-2015
2015-2016
2016-2017
2017-2018
2018-2019
Improve Mathematics Outcomes— USBE Actions USBE began SSIP implementation by intensely supporting nine LEAs (I-9s) Washington School District, Iron School District, Alpine School District, Jordan School District, Granite School District, Wasatch School District, Davis School District, Spectrum Academy, Quest Academy
USBE is providing targeted support to LEAs who request it through their Special Education Program Improvement Plans
Improve Mathematics Outcomes— USBE Actions USBE is providing universal support to all LEAs • • • • •
Teacher Book Study: Mathematics Mindsets by Jo Boaler Administrator Book Study: Mathematics Mindsets by Jo Boaler Mathematical Mindsets MOOC Supporting Students Who Struggle in Mathematics webinars USBE-UCTM Maximize Mathematics Learning for All Students Conference (Aug 2017)
USBE is working with outside organizations/agencies to improve expectations/beliefs • USBE-PR campaign • Legislative roundtable at State Capitol on December 12th
• USBE-UPC Parent Book Study: Mindset by Carol S. Dweck • 300 people registered from across the state (15 districts and 5 charter schools) • Over 100 participants were online for the first session
SSIP Progress:
SAGE Mathematics Proficiency for Students with Disabilities (SWD) 2013-14
Grades 3-8
Grade 10
20.1%
2014-15
17.1%
2015-16
17.6%
2013-14
7.9%
2014-15
7.2%
2015-16
7.1%
+0.55
SSIP Progress:
State-Identified Measurable Result (SIMR)
UT
2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
I-9
2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
7.1% 8.7% 9.9% 8.1% 9.5% 10.6%
+1.60 +1.24 +1.37 +1.13
SSIP Progress:
Off Grade Level Mathematics Courses
UT I-9
2014-15 2015-16 2014-15 2015-16
4.5% 4.8% 3.5% 5.7%
SSIP Progress:
ACT Participation in 11th Grade 2014-15 UT All SWD 2015-16 2014-15 I-9 All SWD 2015-16 2014-15 UT SLI/SLD 2015-16 2014-15 I-9 SLI/SLD 2015-16
62.5% 65.5% 60.1% 63.8%
+3.0 +3.7
70.8% 74.3% +3.5 68.4% 72.6% +4.2
SSIP Progress:
Teachers with Special Education Mathematics Endorsements
UT I-9
2014-15
11.1% (495 of 4,444)
2015-16 2014-15 2015-16
10.6% 9.6% 9.3%
(466 of 4,397) (199 of 2,077) (187 of 2,020)
SSIP Baseline Data Analysis 2013-2014 Grades 6-8 SAGE Mathematics Percent Proficient
37.1%
22.2 14.9% 7.1% Non-SWD
SWD
SLD/SLI
Utah State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) 2015 IF Utah implements broad coherent improvement strategies
2019
THEORY OF ACTION High Expectations and Beliefs
Inclusion in grade level core content, assessment, graduation requirements, and CCR plans
THEN Utah’s State-Identified Measureable Result, SIMR
Utah will increase the percentage of students with Specific Learning Disabilities (SLD) or Speech/Language Impairment (SLI) in grades Leadership • Active 6-8 who are proficient on Engagement of All School Personnel • the SAGE mathematics Data-Driven Decision-Making • Preservice assessment by and Inservice Professional Learning • 11.11% over a Partnerships and Collaboration • IEP Team 5-year period. Decisions • Evidence-Based Practices •Fiscal Support
Content Knowledge and Effective Instruction
Math content and pedagogy to provide effective instruction through UDL and evidence-based practices
Multi-Tiered System of Supports Secondary Settings Infrastructure, Scale, Fidelity
SIMR Achievement Gap 22.22% 11.11% Goal Actual
2.22%
Goal: Cut Achievement Gap in Half over 5 Years
1.6%
2.22%
1.24%
2.22%
2.22%
2.22%
2014-2015
2015-2016
2016-2017
2017-2018
2018-2019
Improve Mathematics Outcomes— USBE Actions USBE began SSIP implementation by intensely supporting nine LEAs (I-9s) Washington School District, Iron School District, Alpine School District, Jordan School District, Granite School District, Wasatch School District, Davis School District, Spectrum Academy, Quest Academy
USBE is providing targeted support to LEAs who request it through their Special Education Program Improvement Plans
Improve Mathematics Outcomes— USBE Actions USBE is providing universal support to all LEAs • • • • •
Teacher Book Study: Mathematics Mindsets by Jo Boaler Administrator Book Study: Mathematics Mindsets by Jo Boaler Mathematical Mindsets MOOC Supporting Students Who Struggle in Mathematics webinars USBE-UCTM Maximize Mathematics Learning for All Students Conference (Aug 2017)
USBE is working with outside organizations/agencies to improve expectations/beliefs • USBE-PR campaign • Legislative roundtable at State Capitol on December 12th
• USBE-UPC Parent Book Study: Mindset by Carol S. Dweck • 300 people registered from across the state (15 districts and 5 charter schools) • Over 100 participants were online for the first session
SSIP Progress:
SAGE Mathematics Proficiency for Students with Disabilities (SWD) 2013-14
Grades 3-8
Grade 10
20.1%
2014-15
17.1%
2015-16
17.6%
2013-14
7.9%
2014-15
7.2%
2015-16
7.1%
+0.55
SSIP Progress:
State-Identified Measurable Result (SIMR)
UT
2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
I-9
2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
7.1% 8.7% 9.9% 8.1% 9.5% 10.6%
+1.60 +1.24 +1.37 +1.13
SSIP Progress:
Off Grade Level Mathematics Courses
UT I-9
2014-15 2015-16 2014-15 2015-16
4.5% 4.8% 3.5% 5.7%
SSIP Progress:
ACT Participation in 11th Grade 2014-15 UT All SWD 2015-16 2014-15 I-9 All SWD 2015-16 2014-15 UT SLI/SLD 2015-16 2014-15 I-9 SLI/SLD 2015-16
62.5% 65.5% 60.1% 63.8%
+3.0 +3.7
70.8% 74.3% +3.5 68.4% 72.6% +4.2
SSIP Progress:
Teachers with Special Education Mathematics Endorsements
UT I-9
2014-15
11.1% (495 of 4,444)
2015-16 2014-15 2015-16
10.6% 9.6% 9.3%
(466 of 4,397) (199 of 2,077) (187 of 2,020)
