State Systemic Improvement Plan
"Kids First, New Mexico Wins!"
Results Driven Accountability Federal Programs Division Hanna Skandera Secretary of Education
New Mexico Public Education Department
Denise Koscielniak Director of Federal Programs
Results Driven Accountability (RDA) History • Message from Secretary Arne Duncan • Shift from compliance to outcomes • 2011 Continuous Improvement Visit (CIV) • Must focus on measurable indicator(s) • 2nd State to pilot plan
2
NM’s RDA Plan • Stakeholder Meeting 2011 o Focus on state efforts o Elementary-level reading o Overall school improvements (school grades) o Lowest quartile (students with disabilities, low socio-economic status, Native American students)
4
RDA • NM’s plan o Supports A-F school grading o Focuses on reading growth rates especially in grades K-3 o Supports Reads to Lead o Math and positive behavioral interventions and supports o Includes parent involvement and funding for parent centers for parent training
o Title I and Special Education Collaboration o Shared FTE o IDEA B State Directed Activities funds o Fiscal plan – support RDA activities o REC Support o IDEA Advisory Panel
5
RDA Cont’d • Site Selection and Consideration o C, D or F school grade o Quartile 1 Grade o High % spec. ed. enrollment o School-wide Title I o Elementary Schools o 50% sites high Native American population
• Coordination with Priority Schools Bureau • Collaboration with Literacy Bureau
6
• Keep on implementing plan • Guidelines forthcoming
8
“It’s Official” RDA Next Steps Other States
• RDA announced o Accountability o State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP)
• How to scale up o Infrastructure o Alignment of state initiatives o Implementation • HR • Fiscal
New Mexico
11
RDA or SSIP • Student oriented • 5 year plan (2014/152018/19) • Does not have to be state-wide • Includes scale up • Must relate to other indicators o Reading Proficiency – direct o Disproportionate Representation – direct o Other indirect indicators 12
Phase I SSIP
13
Phase I
IDEA Data Center
RDA Data Analysis • State Reading Assessment • NAEP • NMSBA & PARCC • Graduation Rates • Drop-out Rates • Suspension/Expulsion • Disproportionality • State Demographics, including poverty 15
Increased Graduation Rates
Decreased Drop Out Rates
Improved Q1 grade
Reading Proficiency through Early Reading Initiative
Decreased Discipline Infractions
Improved School Grade
Decreased Inappropriate Referrals
16
RDA in the Title I Bureau • RDA is housed in the Title I bureau of PED, funded through special education (the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act – IDEA Part B and D) • In-kind support Title I staff and combined FTE • At risk students and students with disabilities tend to score in the lowest quartile (the lowest 25%) • Focus is on lowest quartile, but important to support entire school improvement o Most students with disabilities spend most of their time in general education classrooms
17
Priority Schools Support Results Driven Accountability Interventions Desk-top Monitoring
State-identified Measurable Result(s) (SIMR) for Children with Disabilities A description of the result(s) the State intends to achieve through the implementation of the SSIP. The State-identified result(s) must be aligned to an SPP/APR indicator or a component of an SPP/APR indicator. The State-identified result(s) must be clearly based on the Data and State Infrastructure Analyses and must be a child-level outcome in contrast to a process outcome. The State may select a single result (e.g., increasing the graduation rate for children with disabilities) or a cluster of related results (e.g., increasing the graduation rate and decreasing the dropout rate for children with disabilities).
19
SIMR New Mexico’s State Identified Measurable Result (SIMR) is: By federal fiscal year (FFY) 2018, 47.8% of students with disabilities in Results Driven Accountability schools will score benchmark on the End of Year DIBELS-Next Composite. Baseline data and targets are measurable and rigorous Baseline data from 2013 indicate that 37.8% of students with disabilities in Results Driven Accountability (RDA) schools scored benchmark on the End of Year DIBELS-Next Composite. Reaching the 2018 goal of 47.8% represents a 26% increase in achievement from the baseline data, collected in FFY 2013. FFY 2013 – FFY 2018 Targets FFY Target
2014 39.8
2015 41.8
2016 43.8
2017 45.8
2018 47.8
20
21
Phase II SSIP
22
Phase II
IDEA Data Center
Measures Outputs • Program Accomplishments • Direct Results of Activities • Description and number of products and events • Customer contacts with products and events • Fidelity of program activities
IDEA Data Center
Short-Term Outcomes • What customers and people learn as a result of outputs • What awareness, attitudes, or skills they develop
24
Measures Intermediate Outcomes • Changes in adult actions or behaviors based in knowledge • Fidelity of the planned interventions • Improved organizational functioning • Improved system functioning IDEA Data Center
Long-Term Outcomes • Broad program outcomes • Results that fulfill the program’s goals • Impact on children and families • Program sustainability, or what ensures or promotes scale-up and sustainability 25
Formative Evaluation
IDEA Data Center
26
Summative Evaluation
IDEA Data Center
28
29
We are seeing results with result driven accountability
30
RDA sites through 2015-2016
31
Results Driven Accountability Federal Programs Division Hanna Skandera Secretary of Education
New Mexico Public Education Department
Denise Koscielniak Director of Federal Programs
Results Driven Accountability (RDA) History • Message from Secretary Arne Duncan • Shift from compliance to outcomes • 2011 Continuous Improvement Visit (CIV) • Must focus on measurable indicator(s) • 2nd State to pilot plan
2
NM’s RDA Plan • Stakeholder Meeting 2011 o Focus on state efforts o Elementary-level reading o Overall school improvements (school grades) o Lowest quartile (students with disabilities, low socio-economic status, Native American students)
4
RDA • NM’s plan o Supports A-F school grading o Focuses on reading growth rates especially in grades K-3 o Supports Reads to Lead o Math and positive behavioral interventions and supports o Includes parent involvement and funding for parent centers for parent training
o Title I and Special Education Collaboration o Shared FTE o IDEA B State Directed Activities funds o Fiscal plan – support RDA activities o REC Support o IDEA Advisory Panel
5
RDA Cont’d • Site Selection and Consideration o C, D or F school grade o Quartile 1 Grade o High % spec. ed. enrollment o School-wide Title I o Elementary Schools o 50% sites high Native American population
• Coordination with Priority Schools Bureau • Collaboration with Literacy Bureau
6
• Keep on implementing plan • Guidelines forthcoming
8
“It’s Official” RDA Next Steps Other States
• RDA announced o Accountability o State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP)
• How to scale up o Infrastructure o Alignment of state initiatives o Implementation • HR • Fiscal
New Mexico
11
RDA or SSIP • Student oriented • 5 year plan (2014/152018/19) • Does not have to be state-wide • Includes scale up • Must relate to other indicators o Reading Proficiency – direct o Disproportionate Representation – direct o Other indirect indicators 12
Phase I SSIP
13
Phase I
IDEA Data Center
RDA Data Analysis • State Reading Assessment • NAEP • NMSBA & PARCC • Graduation Rates • Drop-out Rates • Suspension/Expulsion • Disproportionality • State Demographics, including poverty 15
Increased Graduation Rates
Decreased Drop Out Rates
Improved Q1 grade
Reading Proficiency through Early Reading Initiative
Decreased Discipline Infractions
Improved School Grade
Decreased Inappropriate Referrals
16
RDA in the Title I Bureau • RDA is housed in the Title I bureau of PED, funded through special education (the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act – IDEA Part B and D) • In-kind support Title I staff and combined FTE • At risk students and students with disabilities tend to score in the lowest quartile (the lowest 25%) • Focus is on lowest quartile, but important to support entire school improvement o Most students with disabilities spend most of their time in general education classrooms
17
Priority Schools Support Results Driven Accountability Interventions Desk-top Monitoring
State-identified Measurable Result(s) (SIMR) for Children with Disabilities A description of the result(s) the State intends to achieve through the implementation of the SSIP. The State-identified result(s) must be aligned to an SPP/APR indicator or a component of an SPP/APR indicator. The State-identified result(s) must be clearly based on the Data and State Infrastructure Analyses and must be a child-level outcome in contrast to a process outcome. The State may select a single result (e.g., increasing the graduation rate for children with disabilities) or a cluster of related results (e.g., increasing the graduation rate and decreasing the dropout rate for children with disabilities).
19
SIMR New Mexico’s State Identified Measurable Result (SIMR) is: By federal fiscal year (FFY) 2018, 47.8% of students with disabilities in Results Driven Accountability schools will score benchmark on the End of Year DIBELS-Next Composite. Baseline data and targets are measurable and rigorous Baseline data from 2013 indicate that 37.8% of students with disabilities in Results Driven Accountability (RDA) schools scored benchmark on the End of Year DIBELS-Next Composite. Reaching the 2018 goal of 47.8% represents a 26% increase in achievement from the baseline data, collected in FFY 2013. FFY 2013 – FFY 2018 Targets FFY Target
2014 39.8
2015 41.8
2016 43.8
2017 45.8
2018 47.8
20
21
Phase II SSIP
22
Phase II
IDEA Data Center
Measures Outputs • Program Accomplishments • Direct Results of Activities • Description and number of products and events • Customer contacts with products and events • Fidelity of program activities
IDEA Data Center
Short-Term Outcomes • What customers and people learn as a result of outputs • What awareness, attitudes, or skills they develop
24
Measures Intermediate Outcomes • Changes in adult actions or behaviors based in knowledge • Fidelity of the planned interventions • Improved organizational functioning • Improved system functioning IDEA Data Center
Long-Term Outcomes • Broad program outcomes • Results that fulfill the program’s goals • Impact on children and families • Program sustainability, or what ensures or promotes scale-up and sustainability 25
Formative Evaluation
IDEA Data Center
26
Summative Evaluation
IDEA Data Center
28
29
We are seeing results with result driven accountability
30
RDA sites through 2015-2016
31
