Staff Presentation - Arlingtonva

Report 2 Downloads 19 Views
SP #440, Mazda Block 750 N. Glebe Road

CPHD – Planning SPRC Meeting #2 December 10, 2015 1

Corrections 2

GLUP: HighMedium Residential Mixed-Use

Purpose

To provide

High-medium density residential



Multiple-family dwelling development at

development while also providing for a

moderate densities and high-rise

between higher

mixed-use transitional area

multiple family dwelling redevelopment



For use in Metro station areas within



Site shall be designated “high-

lower density

a ¼ mile radius of the Metro station

medium” residential or other

residential areas

entrance and designated HMRMU

comparable designation



Residential and mixed use



Associated office and retail

Max Height*



RA-4.8 (Adopted 1962; Redrafted 1982)

transitional zone density uses and

Uses

R-C (Adopted 1979)

Not provided

• • • •

Residential Public, civic and institutional Office, business professional

• • •

Residential Public, civic and institutional Retail, service, office, and business professional (street level)

Retail, service (first floor only)

95 feet (+16 feet penthouse + 8 feet

136 feet (inclusive of penthouse)

mechanical; under no circumstances may height exceed 95 feet)

Max FAR**

3.24--3.5 FAR including associated office and retail activities

1.0 SF of GFA of apartment)

Open Space

N/A

10% Landscaped Open Space

3.24—3.5 FAR (including commercial uses

3.24 (including max 0.5 FAR street level

which may not exceed 1.0 SF of GFA per

sales and service)

N/A

* The height standards in the RA4.8 District are listed as “maximum height,” and therefore bonus height is permitted. By contrast, the R-C District lists height as “under no circumstances shall the height exceed” 95 feet; therefore, bonus height may not be approved by the County Board. **The R-C District contains a height regulation which may not be exceeded with bonus height, therefore limiting the total amount of density able to be approved, with bonuses to the amount which fits into the building envelope created by the height limitation.

3

SITE AREA: 121,574 square feet Zoning District

R-C

RA4.8

Max Height

95 feet

136 feet

BASE

PROPOSED

BASE

PROPOSED

FAR

3.5 FAR

4.5 FAR

3.24 FAR

4.5 FAR

Residential GFA

212,755 sq. ft.

478,898 sq. ft.

333,113 sq. ft.

478,898 sq. ft.

212,755 sq. ft. (max)

68,185 sq. ft.

60,787 sq. ft.

68,185 sq. ft.

425,509 sq. ft.

547, 083 sq. ft.

393, 900 sq. ft.

547, 083 sq. ft.

Commercial GFA Total GFA

4

Site Design 5

Analysis/Assessment • Policy & best practice • Technical constraints and considerations

6

WHAT IS SITE DESIGN? Access and Permeability

Connectivity

Allocation of uses on the site Placement and orientation of buildings

7

Connectivity/Street Grid

MASTER TRANSPORTATION PLAN: No changes to street grid recommended

8

Block Size +/- 450 ft.

+/- 580 ft.

+/- 660 ft. +/- 730 ft.

+/- 340 ft. +/- 350 ft. +/- 300 ft. +/- 380 ft. +/- 400 ft. +/- 476 ft. +/- 530 ft. +/- 450 ft.

9

Access and Permeability MTP Typology North Glebe Road Type B: Urban Mixed Use Wilson Boulevard Type B: Urban Mixed Use Seventh Street North Urban Center Local/Neighborhood North Tazewell Street Urban Center Local/Neighborhood North Vermont Street Urban Center Local/Neighborhood

10

Access and Permeability Limited access from Glebe Road in recent site plans

SP #401

SP #331

SP #437

Glebe/Wilson intersection • High volume urban arterial streets • LOS E or F during peak periods

SP #72

11

Alley Configuration MTP Streets Element: “Expect service alleys and off‐street delivery/loading zones in all new commercial, mixed‐use and high‐ density residential developments. Minimize the number and size of curb cuts for new developments, particularly along arterial streets. Place curb cuts where pedestrian volume is lowest.”

Alleys serve to: 1. Consolidate access 2. Manage curb cuts

12

Pedestrian Access

Potential Grocery Store Cut-Through

13

Placement & Orientation of buildings Building’s active frontages and large-scale features should be oriented towards Glebe Road and Wilson Boulevard

ARLINGTON COUNTY RETAIL PLAN 14

Allocation of Uses on Site

“High-Medium” Residential Mixed-Use

15

Peck/Staples • 2008: – Land use and transportation study for the Peck/Staples site in conjunction with request for GLUP Amendment, rezoning and site plan – Project pre-dated the Special GLUP Study resolution adopted by the County Board – 2 “Pre”-SPRC meetings devoted to GLUP and transportation discussion – Recommendations developed to address land use, street connectivity, and transitions to the west 16

Peck/Staples –

In contrast to the remainder of the west side of Glebe Road, the GLUP designation for the site was unchanged since 1961



“Service Commercial” designation was an outlier and viewed as incompatible with surrounding development



Goal of the “process” was to determine the appropriate GLUP designation, while considering appropriate transitions in building form and transportation connections 17

Peck/Staples Pedestrian Connectivity with 9th Street Greenway to Metro Provides service/access building locations not on Glebe Road Allowed for curb cut management No conflicts with adjacent intersections, with rightin/right out operations

18

Mazda Block vs. Peck/Staples • Large site • Prominent corner • Sensitive transition

• The site contains the appropriate GLUP designation • Street grid is not recommended to be altered • Glebe/Wilson intersection upstream of site 19

Thank you! 20

Pedestrian connectivity

21