World Energy Outlook: Energy Challenges Ahead

Report 2 Downloads 154 Views
World Energy Outlook: Energy Challenges Ahead Laura Cozzi International Energy Agency 2005 Annual Forum on Energy and Sustainability 6-8 November, Madrid INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY

Reference Scenario: The Challenges

INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY

World Primary Energy Demand 18 000 16 000 14 000 Oil

Mtoe

12 000 10 000

Gas

8 000 6 000

Coal

4 000 2 000

Other renewables

0 1970 1971

INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY

1980

1990

2000

2010

2020

Nuclear Hydro 2030

Oil, gas and coal together account for 83% of the growth in energy demand between now and 2030 in the Reference Scenario

Inter-Regional Trade in World FossilFuel Supply 6 000

Trade as % of world demand

5 000

Mtoe

4 000 3 000

63%

26%

15%

46% 14%

15%

2 000 1 000 0 2002

2030

2002

Oil Domestic consumption

INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY

2030

Gas

2002

2030

Coal Traded between regions

Energy trade between regions more than doubles by 2030, most of it still in the form of oil

Oil Flows & Major Chokepoints: The “Dire Straits”

INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY

The risk of an oil-supply disruption will grow as trade and flows through key maritime and pipeline chokepoints expand

World Energy-Related CO2 Emissions 20 000

Mt of CO2

16 000 12 000

8 000 4 000

0 1970 OECD

INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY

1980

1990

2000

Transition economies

2010

2020

2030

Developing countries

Global emissions grow 62% between now & 2030, with developing countries’ emissions overtaking OECD’s in the 2020s

Cumulative Energy Investment 2003-2030 OECD North America OECD Europe OECD Pacific Transition economies China Other Asia Middle East Africa Latin America 0

500

1 000

1 500

2 000

2 500

3 000

3 500

billion $ (2000)

Coal

INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY

Oil

Gas

Power sector absorbs 62% of global energy investment in the period 2003-2030

Alternative Policy Scenario

INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY

Electricity

World Alternative Policy Scenario z Strong endorsement of G8 meeting at Gleanegles z Current prices favor WAPS z Analyses impact of new environmental & energy-security policies worldwide

¾ OECD: Policies currently under consideration ¾ Non-OECD: Also includes more rapid declines in

energy intensity resulting from faster deployment of more-efficient technology

z Impact on fuel-mix, environment & cost z Oil, gas & electricity prices change INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY

World Primary Energy Demand in Reference & Alternative Scenarios 17 000 16 000

Reference Scenario

15 000 14 000 Mtoe

13 000 12 000

Alternative Scenario

11 000 10 000 0



- 1 000 - 2 000 2000

2005 Coal

INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY

2010 Oil

2015 Gas

2020

Nuclear

2025

2030

Renewables

Coal demand falls most among fossil fuels, partially offset by more use of renewables

Average Vehicle Fuel Efficiency for New Light Duty Vehicles in Selected Regions, 2002

litres per 100 km

10

5

0 OECD North America

China

India

Japan

OECD Europe

The scope for improving vehicle efficiency is large in many regions – including OECD countries

INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY

Oil Demand for Transport in the Reference and Alternative Scenarios by Region 2 000 1 600

+44 %

M toe

1 200

+26 % +159 %

800

+127 %

400 0 OECD 2002

INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY

2030 Reference Scenario

non-OECD 2030 Alternative Scenario

Oil demand for transport is almost 10% lower in the WAPS compare to the RS in 2030

Reduction in Oil Demand in the Alternative vs. Reference Scenario, 2030 Power generation 8%

Other 4%

Residential and services 11%

Industry 13%

Transport 64%

Oil savings = 12.8 mb/d

INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY

Oil savings in 2030 would be equivalent to the combined current production of Saudi Arabia and UAE

Net Gas Imports in the Alternative and Reference Scenarios, 2030 600

bcm

400

200

0 OECD North America

Reference Scenario

OECD Europe

OECD Asia

Alternative Scenario

Net gas imports are lower in all major importing regions INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY

Share of Non-Hydro Renewables in Electricity Generation, 2030 OECD Europe OECD North America OECD Pacific East Asia Latin America China South Asia Middle East Africa Transition economies 0%

5%

10%

Reference Scenario

INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY

15%

20%

Alternative Scenario

25% RS

New policies would boost the share of non-hydro-renewables in all regions – most in the EU in absolute terms

OECD CO2 Emissions in the Reference and Alternative Scenarios 16 000

Mt of CO 2

15 000 14 000 13 000 12 000 11 000 1990

2000 Reference Scenario

INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY

2010

2020

2030

Alternative Scenario

OECD CO2 emissions peak around 2020 – 25% higher than in 1990

Contributory Factors in CO2 Reduction 2002-2030 100%

5%

10% 80%

4%

8%

21%

12%

17%

20%

15%

21% 60%

5%

7%

1%

7% 10%

40%

58% 20%

63%

67%

Transition economies

Developing countries

49%

0% World

OECD

End-use efficiency gains Fuel switching in end uses Increased nuclear in power generation Increased renewables in power generation Changes in the fossil-fuel mix in power generation

Improvements in end-use efficiency contribute for more than half of decrease in emissions, and renewables use for 20%

INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY

Difference in Electricity Investment in the Alternative vs. Reference Scenario 2003-2030 1 000

billion dollars (2000)

500

Efficiency measures

Avoided supply-side investment

Difference

0

- 500 -1 000

Additional demand-side investment

Generation, Transmission and Distribution

-1 500 -2 000

Additional investments on the demand side are more than offset by lower investment on the supply side INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY

Deferred Investment Scenario

INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY

World Proven Oil and Gas Reserves Oil Non-MENA 39% Saudi Arabia 20% Other MENA 14%

Natural gas Kuwait 8%

Iran 10%

Other MENA 8% UAE 3%

INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY

Non-MENA 55%

Iraq 9%

Saudi Arabia 4%

Qatar 14%

Iran 16%

MENA share of global oil and gas reserves is much higher than its share of current production, suggesting strong potential for growth

Deferred Investment Scenario z How would global energy markets evolve if investment MENA upstream oil industry grew slower than in the Reference Scenario? z Investment might be deferred because of ¾ Deliberate policy on the part of producers ¾ External financing constraints

z Investment is assumed to remain constant as share of GDP in each country z Results in a reduction of between 10% and 40% in oil investment vis-à-vis the RS z MENA oil production falls progressively versus the RS z Oil prices are driven higher, dragging up gas & coal prices z MENA gas production is also lower due to ‰ Lower associated oil/gas output INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY

‰ Reduced global gas demand & call on MENA gas

Summary & Conclusions

INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY

Conclusions z If governments stick with current policies, global energy needs will be more than 50% higher in 2030 than today z Fossil fuels will continue to dominate the energy mix z Projected market trends raise serious concerns ¾ Increased vulnerability to supply disruptions ¾ Rising CO2 emissions ¾ Huge energy-investment needs

z More vigorous consuming-country policies could curb demand growth & reduce reliance on MENA oil and gas ‰ Far more radical policy action & technology breakthroughs

would be needed to reverse these trends

z Upstream MENA investment is a critical uncertainty ‰ Constraining the long-term expansion of productive capacity

will be in neither producers’ nor consumers’ interests INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY

World Energy Outlook 2005 z Answers the question: how much oil and gas will the Middle East and North Africa export through to 2030? z Focuses on Saudi Arabia, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, the UAE, Qatar, Egypt, Libya and Algeria z Analyses three distinct scenarios: Reference, Deferred Investment and Alternative Policy z Draws implications for global energy markets, international oil and gas prices and energy security INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY

z Will be presented in Madrid on 15 December

Thank you! [email protected] www.worldenergyoutlook.org

INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY