District Data Team Meeting AWS
DISTRICT DATA TEAM MEETING
April 19, 2012
Thursday, April 19, 2012 9:00 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. Conference Room A Central Offices Members in Attendance: Freeman Burr, Lorraine Rossner, Kathy Bender, Tina Henckel, Kristen DiPalma, Ken Saranich, Beth Smith, Anne Hamilton, Faylynn Haight, Karen Crosby, Eileen Zavoluk, and Dana Urban Agenda DDT Meeting:
Continued discussion on Standardized Reading Scores in” transitional years” – Grades 3, 5, & 7 - T. Henckel/K. DiPalma/D. Urban - 20 min o
Data graphs are posted under “district data team”
o
Data request – Grade 3 - Strand C trend data for each strand compared to the State over time - Making Connections
o
Data request – Grade 7 – Trend data all strands
o
F&RL trend data – view F&RL subgroup scores in relationship to State and Shelton
o
DRP trend data – view DRP scores by grade level in relationship to State and Shelton overall
SHS Data Visualization Science – D. Urban - 20 min o o
Collecting data on Science Department CFA Structure SHS Science Workbook Biology 1 scores (2 CFAs) 1-5 Scale Comparison by class, track, and teacher by all sections taught by the individual teacher Questions to Ask???? Instructional Practices – Student Performance – Departmental Trends – Other Grading Practices (behavior, attendance, cheating) Leadership Discussions focused on Instructional Practices and Impact on Scores/Implementation/Indicators
SRBI Rubric Feedback – TEAM – 20 min o
Review of SRBI Rubric Survey results for all elementary schools and Perry Hill Coversheet Report and Individual School Feedback Report Evidence Time will be needed to analyze the report
DISTRICT DATA TEAM MEETING
April 19, 2012
Concern is focused on the “level of implementation” and individual school self-ranking We may have to develop a menu of evidence to choose from in order to quantify and unify information and feedback to a greater degree We may need to calibrate “understanding of indicators” to unify ranked outcomes Process vs. Product Define Tier 1 in order to calibrate
o
Pull together a team of representatives to discuss the survey product and infuse change
o
Intermediate and High School Survey results will be conducted in the May DDT meeting
Good of the Order Possibly bring Warren Logue back to revisit the DDT Process for Feedback and Suggestions Next District Data Team Thursday, May 17, 2012 1:00 – 3:00 Conference Room A Central Administrative Offices Tentative Agenda Items for next meeting:
SRBI Rubric Feedback – TEAM – 20 min o
Intermediate and High School Survey Results
Predictor Outcomes Grade 5 and 6 and Findings – D. Urban/T. Henckel/K. DiPalma - 20 min o
Cohort trend (for current 7th grade back) data over time – reading strands
o
Reports will now be formatted to outline predictors
o
Data analysis of impact by a change in teacher
o
Over time trends
o
Impacted Grade 3 students in schools not effected by Teacher Change
Reassess DDT Team according to District Data Team Standards
April 19, 2012
Thursday, April 19, 2012 9:00 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. Conference Room A Central Offices Members in Attendance: Freeman Burr, Lorraine Rossner, Kathy Bender, Tina Henckel, Kristen DiPalma, Ken Saranich, Beth Smith, Anne Hamilton, Faylynn Haight, Karen Crosby, Eileen Zavoluk, and Dana Urban Agenda DDT Meeting:
Continued discussion on Standardized Reading Scores in” transitional years” – Grades 3, 5, & 7 - T. Henckel/K. DiPalma/D. Urban - 20 min o
Data graphs are posted under “district data team”
o
Data request – Grade 3 - Strand C trend data for each strand compared to the State over time - Making Connections
o
Data request – Grade 7 – Trend data all strands
o
F&RL trend data – view F&RL subgroup scores in relationship to State and Shelton
o
DRP trend data – view DRP scores by grade level in relationship to State and Shelton overall
SHS Data Visualization Science – D. Urban - 20 min o o
Collecting data on Science Department CFA Structure SHS Science Workbook Biology 1 scores (2 CFAs) 1-5 Scale Comparison by class, track, and teacher by all sections taught by the individual teacher Questions to Ask???? Instructional Practices – Student Performance – Departmental Trends – Other Grading Practices (behavior, attendance, cheating) Leadership Discussions focused on Instructional Practices and Impact on Scores/Implementation/Indicators
SRBI Rubric Feedback – TEAM – 20 min o
Review of SRBI Rubric Survey results for all elementary schools and Perry Hill Coversheet Report and Individual School Feedback Report Evidence Time will be needed to analyze the report
DISTRICT DATA TEAM MEETING
April 19, 2012
Concern is focused on the “level of implementation” and individual school self-ranking We may have to develop a menu of evidence to choose from in order to quantify and unify information and feedback to a greater degree We may need to calibrate “understanding of indicators” to unify ranked outcomes Process vs. Product Define Tier 1 in order to calibrate
o
Pull together a team of representatives to discuss the survey product and infuse change
o
Intermediate and High School Survey results will be conducted in the May DDT meeting
Good of the Order Possibly bring Warren Logue back to revisit the DDT Process for Feedback and Suggestions Next District Data Team Thursday, May 17, 2012 1:00 – 3:00 Conference Room A Central Administrative Offices Tentative Agenda Items for next meeting:
SRBI Rubric Feedback – TEAM – 20 min o
Intermediate and High School Survey Results
Predictor Outcomes Grade 5 and 6 and Findings – D. Urban/T. Henckel/K. DiPalma - 20 min o
Cohort trend (for current 7th grade back) data over time – reading strands
o
Reports will now be formatted to outline predictors
o
Data analysis of impact by a change in teacher
o
Over time trends
o
Impacted Grade 3 students in schools not effected by Teacher Change
Reassess DDT Team according to District Data Team Standards
