Community & Student Engagement Performance Evaluation 2016-17
Community & Student Engagement Performance Evaluation 2016-17 Campus District
Nixon-Smiley Middle School Nixon-Smiley CISD
Summary of Ratings by Program
Fine Arts Wellness and Physical Education Community and Parental Involvement 21st Century Workforce Development Second Language Acquisition Digital Learning Environment Dropout Prevention Strategies Gifted and Talented
2016-17 Score
2016-17 Rating
Letter Grade that WOULD BE ASSIGNED IF this were 2017-18
4.0 4.0 3.5 4.0 3.7 4.0 4.0 2.7
Exemplary
A
Exemplary
A
Exemplary
A
Exemplary
A
Exemplary
A
Exemplary
A
Exemplary
A
Recognized
B
Community & Student Engagement Performance Evaluation 2016-17 Campus District
Nixon-Smiley Middle School Nixon-Smiley CISD
Fine Arts Indicators 1
2
3
4
Did the campus provide regular opportunities for students to participate in fine arts curriculum? Examples: Band concerts - beginner, perform at Family Reading Night, Christmas concert, Spring concert, UIL contests; Theatre Arts - Christmas performance, special performances at pep rallies
Did the campus offer and encourage student involvement in co-curricular fine arts activities? Examples: Band concerts - beginner, perform at Family Reading Night, Christmas concert, Spring concert, UIL contests; Theatre Arts - Christmas performance, special performances at pep rallies
What percentage of students participating in fine arts curriculum were involved in fine arts competitions? Examples: Band concerts - beginner, perform at Family Reading Night, Christmas concert, Spring concert, UIL contests; Theatre Arts - Christmas performance, special performances at pep rallies
Did the campus host Fine Arts events to which the community or parents were invited to attend? Examples: Band concerts - beginner, perform at Family Reading Night, Christmas concert, Spring concert, UIL contests; Theatre Arts - Christmas performance, special performances at pep rallies
0
1
2
3
4
No opportunities for students
1 opportunity for students
5 or more 2 opportunities 4 opportunities opportunities offered for offered for offered for students students students
4
No opportunities for students
5 or more 1 to 2 3 opportunities 4 opportunities opportunities opportunities offered for offered for offered for for students students students students
4
No 1% to 5% of 6% to 9% of 10% to 15% of More than 15% participating FA participating FA participating FA participating FA participating FA students students students students students involved in FA involved in FA involved in FA involved in FA involved in FA competitions competitions competitions competitions competitions
No FA events
1 or 2 FA events
3 FA events
4 FA events
5 or more FA events
Score
4
4
Overall Program Score
4.0
A: ≥ 3.5 | B: ≥ 2.5 and < 3.5 | C: ≥ 1.5 and < 2.5 | D: ≥ 0.5 and < 1.5 | F: < 0.5
Overall Program Letter Grade (for use in 2017-18)
A
Exemplary = A | Recognized = B | Acceptable = C | Unacceptable = D or F
Overall Program Rating (for use in 2016-17)
Exemplary
Community & Student Engagement Performance Evaluation 2016-17 Campus District
Nixon-Smiley Middle School Nixon-Smiley CISD
Wellness and Physical Education Indicators 1
Did the campus participate in the Coordinated Approach to School Health program through PE, cafeteria, classroom and building wide efforts? Examples: Morning announcments, featuring "slow", "go" and "whoa" foods, members of SHAC Committee & Physical Activity and Fitness Sub-committee, SPARK curriculum in PE, participating in daily recess, Mustangs on the Move Fitness Challenge; President's Physical
Did the campus provide opportunities for students and parents to attend events that focused on wellness, emotional health, or overall wellbeing for 2 students? Examples: Coffee Talk w/ Mrs. Clardy, NSCISD Adventure Race in spring, Embody Love Club, No Place for Hate Club,
Did the campus provide opportunities for active employee wellness? 3
Examples: Mustangs on the Move Fitness challenge, monthy wellness updates from campus nurse, notification of Health & Wellness Challenge sponsored by district health insurance company; access to track
0
1
4
Score
4 or more building wide efforts
4
No opportunities for students
4 or more 1 opportunity 2 opportunities 3 opportunities opportunities for students for students for students for students
4
No opportunities for employees
4 or more 1 opportunity 2 opportunities 3 opportunities opportunities for employees for employees for employees for employees
4
No building wide efforts
2
3
1 building wide 2 building wide 3 building wide effort efforts efforts
Overall Program Score
4.0
A: ≥ 3.5 | B: ≥ 2.5 and < 3.5 | C: ≥ 1.5 and < 2.5 | D: ≥ 0.5 and < 1.5 | F: < 0.5
Overall Program Letter Grade (for use in 2017-18)
A
Exemplary = A | Recognized = B | Acceptable = C | Unacceptable = D or F
Overall Program Rating (for use in 2016-17)
Exemplary
Community & Student Engagement Performance Evaluation 2016-17 Campus District
Nixon-Smiley Middle School Nixon-Smiley CISD
Community and Parental Involvement Indicators Did the campus offer opportunities for parents and community volunteers to 1 work in the school in roles or activities that support the needs of the district? Examples: Drug & Alcohol Awareness, Local historian shares town history, classroom volunteer, Wildlife Awareness Presentation, Sexting & Cyberbulling Presentation
Were community or parent representatives encouraged to serve as active participants in campus-level planning such as involvement on the Parent 2 Advisory Committee?
0
1
2
3
4
Score
No opportunities
1 to 2 5 or more 3 opportunities 4 opportunities opportunities opportunities
4
No opportunities
1 to 2 5 or more 3 opportunities 4 opportunities opportunities opportunities
2
Examples: Campus Improvement Plan Committee, LPAC Meetings, Title One Parent Involvement Meetings
3
Did the campus use a variety of communication tools to inform parents of school news and information? Examples: Shared information for District Facebook, District Website, email, teacher communication, flyers/letters home, District marquee, Remind101
4
Did the campus provide parents and community members with opportunities to be involved in classrooms or school events? Examples: Meet the Teacher night, parent meetings, Family Reading Night, Adventure Race, pep rallies, Award Ceremonies
No 1 2 3 4 or more communication communication communication communication communication tools tool tools tools tools
No opportunities
1 to 2 5 or more 3 opportunities 4 opportunities opportunities opportunities
4
4
Overall Program Score
3.5
A: ≥ 3.5 | B: ≥ 2.5 and < 3.5 | C: ≥ 1.5 and < 2.5 | D: ≥ 0.5 and < 1.5 | F: < 0.5
Overall Program Letter Grade (for use in 2017-18)
A
Exemplary = A | Recognized = B | Acceptable = C | Unacceptable = D or F
Overall Program Rating (for use in 2016-17)
Exemplary
Community & Student Engagement Performance Evaluation 2016-17 Campus District
Nixon-Smiley Middle School Nixon-Smiley CISD
21st Century Workforce Development Indicators 1
Did the campus host or participate in college/career activities or opportunities during the current academic year? Examples: College shirt day - every Wednesday, College Tree, guidance lessons, College and Career Day, College & Career Research Project
2
3
Were technology applications integrated and blended into teacher instruction? Examples: iPads, laptops, Chromebooks, SMART boards, Apple TV, Flat screen TVs, Elmos, Google Classroom, Google Apps, Online textbooks, Achieve 3000, IXL - math, language arts, science, ST Math, Study Island
Did the campus give students the opportunity to participate/have access to 21st century learning tools to enhance student engagement/learning? Examples: iPads, Chrome Books, Laptops, Computer Lab, online programs, Google Apps, Google Classroom
0
1
2
3
4
Score
No activities or opportunities
1 activity or opportunity
2 activities or opportunities
3 activities or opportunities
4 activities or opportunities
4
26% to 50% of teachers were observed using technology applications 26% to 50% of students have access to technology for learning
51% to 75% of teachers were observed using technology applications 51% to 75% of students have access to technology for learning
> 75% of teachers were observed using technology applications > 75% of students have access to technology for learning
No teachers Up to 25% of were observed teachers were using observed using technology technology applications applications Up to 25% of Students do not students have have access to access to technology for technology for learning learning
Were students offered the opportunities to participate in Career and > 75% of Technology Education courses, project-based learning opportunities, or other Students were Up to 25% of 26% to 50% of 51% to 75% of students students studentspartici students not offered 4 instructional activities reflecting the needs of 21st century learners? participated in participated in pated in participated in Examples: Principles of Agriculture, Principles of Technology, Principles of Business, Projectbased learning, labs, Online learning - Google Classroom & Google Apps
opportunities
opportunities
opportunities
opportunities
4
4
4
opportunities
Overall Program Score
4.0
A: ≥ 3.5 | B: ≥ 2.5 and < 3.5 | C: ≥ 1.5 and < 2.5 | D: ≥ 0.5 and < 1.5 | F: < 0.5
Overall Program Letter Grade (for use in 2017-18)
A
Exemplary = A | Recognized = B | Acceptable = C | Unacceptable = D or F
Overall Program Rating (for use in 2016-17)
Exemplary
Community & Student Engagement Performance Evaluation 2016-17 Campus District
Nixon-Smiley Middle School Nixon-Smiley CISD
Second Language Acquisition Indicators Did English Language Learners (ELLs) on campus meet or exceed progress on 1 STAAR? Data from 2016 STAAR for math & reading = 49%
2
Did campus staff participate in yearly ELPS Instruction training and LPAC training as applicable? Examples: LPAC training as required, ELPS Instruction training for all
3
Did ELL students on campus demonstrate development in progress as it relates to TELPAS? Met is maintaining composit TELPAS rating and exceed is increasing one or more rating level.
0
1
2
3
4
Score
0% met or exceeded progress
1% to 20% met or exceeded progress
21% to 40% met or exceeded progress
41% to 60% met or exceeded progress
> 60% met or exceeded progress
3
0% trained in ELPS Instruction
1% to 20% 21% to 40% 41% to 60% trained in ELPS trained in ELPS trained in ELPS Instruction Instruction Instruction
> 60% trained in ELPS Instruction
4
Below state standard
1% to 20% met or exceeded progress
21% to 40% met or exceeded progress
> 60% met or exceeded progress
4
41% to 60% met or exceeded progress
Overall Program Score
3.7
A: ≥ 3.5 | B: ≥ 2.5 and < 3.5 | C: ≥ 1.5 and < 2.5 | D: ≥ 0.5 and < 1.5 | F: < 0.5
Overall Program Letter Grade (for use in 2017-18)
A
Exemplary = A | Recognized = B | Acceptable = C | Unacceptable = D or F
Overall Program Rating (for use in 2016-17)
Exemplary
Community & Student Engagement Performance Evaluation 2016-17 Campus District
Nixon-Smiley Middle School Nixon-Smiley CISD
Digital Learning Environment Indicators
1
Did the campus provide digital learning professional development opportunities for teachers? Examples: Read,Write, Gold, QuickTime, DMAC, Achieve 3000, ST Math
2
Do parents have access to online resources to monitor student learning and progress? Examples: Gradebook Parent Portal, Achieve 3000 Parent Log In, Remind101
3
Do teachers regularly integrate use of technology and digital learning resources during classroom instruction? Examples: teacher webpage, online textbooks, Achieve 3000, IXL Math, Language Arts & Science, ST Math, Study Island, Edusmart Science
Do all students have access to technology for learning in the classroom? 4 Examples: iPads, Chrombooks, Laptops
0
1
2
3
4
Score
No teachers participated in at least 3 hours of instructional technology PD
1% to 20% of teachers participated in at least 3 hours of instructional technology PD
21% to 40% of teachers participated in at least 3 hours of instructional technology PD
41% to 60% of teachers participated in at least 3 hours of instructional technology PD
> 60% of teachers participated in at least 3 hours of instructional technology PD
4
No parents 0% to 20% of 21% to 40% of 41% to 60% of > 60% of have access to parents have parents have parents have parents have online access to online access to online access to online access to online resources to resources to resources to resources to resources to monitor monitor monitor monitor monitor learning learning learning learning learning
4
1% to 20% of 21% to 40% of No teachers teachers were teachers were were observed observed observed integrating integrating integrating technology and technology and technology and digital learning digital learning digital learning resources resources resources 1% to 20% of 21% to 40% of No students students have students have have access to access to access to technology for technology for technology for learning in the learning in the learning in the classroom classroom classroom
41% to 60% of teachers were observed integrating technology and digital learning resources 41% to 60% of students have access to technology for learning in the classroom
> 60% of teachers were observed integrating technology and digital learning resources > 60% of students have access to technology for learning in the classroom
4
4
Overall Program Score
4.0
A: ≥ 3.5 | B: ≥ 2.5 and < 3.5 | C: ≥ 1.5 and < 2.5 | D: ≥ 0.5 and < 1.5 | F: < 0.5
Overall Program Letter Grade (for use in 2017-18)
A
Exemplary = A | Recognized = B | Acceptable = C | Unacceptable = D or F
Overall Program Rating (for use in 2016-17)
Exemplary
Community & Student Engagement Performance Evaluation 2016-17 Campus District
Nixon-Smiley Middle School Nixon-Smiley CISD
Dropout Prevention Strategies Indicators Does the campus offer clubs/organizations for students? 1 Examples: Embody Love Club, No Place for Hate, Kung Foo Club, Newsletter Club, Student Council, National Junior Honor Society, Mustangs on the Move
2
Does the campus offer multiple opportunities for students to participate in college/career readiness activities? Example: career day, career explorations, college days, monthly guidance lessons, Advisory period
Does the campus actively review campus attendance data? 3
4
Data Sources: TxEIS, eSPED, individual student documentation with pattern of absences, daily review of absences and parent communication, teacher review every three week grading period, PBIS
Does the campus attempt to schedule conferences with parents/students who are having attendance issues?
0
1
2
3
4
Score
1 to 2 3 to 4 5 to 6 7 or more No clubs/organclubs/organclubs/organclubs/organclubs/organizations offered izations offered izations offered izations offered izations offered
4
1% to 20% of 21% to 40% of 41% to 60% of > 60% of No students students students students students participated in participated in participated in participated in participated in a CCR activity at least 1 CCR at least 1 CCR at least 1 CCR at least 1 CCR activity activity activity activity
4
No regular reviews
At the end of the semester
At the end of each grading period
Monthly
Weekly
4
No regular attempts
At the end of the semester
At the end of each grading period
Monthly
Weekly
4
Overall Program Score
4.0
A: ≥ 3.5 | B: ≥ 2.5 and < 3.5 | C: ≥ 1.5 and < 2.5 | D: ≥ 0.5 and < 1.5 | F: < 0.5
Overall Program Letter Grade (for use in 2017-18)
A
Exemplary = A | Recognized = B | Acceptable = C | Unacceptable = D or F
Overall Program Rating (for use in 2016-17)
Exemplary
Community & Student Engagement Performance Evaluation 2016-17 Campus District
Nixon-Smiley Middle School Nixon-Smiley CISD
Gifted and Talented Indicators
1
2
3
4
Score
100% of GT 100% of GT teachers met teachers met state state requirements requirements plus 6 or more plus 12 or more additional additional hours of hours of training training
3
The campus did 7 or more not provide 1 or 2 identified 3 or 4 identified 5 or 6 identified identified information opportunities opportunities opportunities opportunities about the GT were provided were provided were provided were provided program to to parents to parents to parents to parents parents
2
More than 7 No identified 1 to 2 identified 3 to 4 identified 5 to 6 identified identified types types of types of types of types of of opportunities opportunities opportunities opportunities opportunities were provided were provided were provided were provided were provided to students to students to students to students to students
3
Overall Program Score
2.7
A: ≥ 3.5 | B: ≥ 2.5 and < 3.5 | C: ≥ 1.5 and < 2.5 | D: ≥ 0.5 and < 1.5 | F: < 0.5
Overall Program Letter Grade (for use in 2017-18)
B
Exemplary = A | Recognized = B | Acceptable = C | Unacceptable = D or F
Overall Program Rating (for use in 2016-17)
Recognized
Do teachers on campus meet minumum state GT training requirements? 1
2
0
Do parents of GT students have opportunities to learn about the GT program during the school year? Examples: Letter home, GT Showcase Event(s)
Is the GT curriculum designed to meet the social, emotional, and learning needs of the gifted including opportunities such as project-based learning, 3 collaborative team-work, learning perseverance, time management, organization, and goal setting? Examples: Mock election, create perfect utopia,"Was Museum" - significance person made in world, work individually, pairs, small groups, class decides topics and how far to delve into
< 100% GT GT teachers did teachers met not meet state minimum state requirements GT training of 12 hours of requirements training
100% of GT teachers met state requirements of 12 hours of training
Nixon-Smiley Middle School Nixon-Smiley CISD
Summary of Ratings by Program
Fine Arts Wellness and Physical Education Community and Parental Involvement 21st Century Workforce Development Second Language Acquisition Digital Learning Environment Dropout Prevention Strategies Gifted and Talented
2016-17 Score
2016-17 Rating
Letter Grade that WOULD BE ASSIGNED IF this were 2017-18
4.0 4.0 3.5 4.0 3.7 4.0 4.0 2.7
Exemplary
A
Exemplary
A
Exemplary
A
Exemplary
A
Exemplary
A
Exemplary
A
Exemplary
A
Recognized
B
Community & Student Engagement Performance Evaluation 2016-17 Campus District
Nixon-Smiley Middle School Nixon-Smiley CISD
Fine Arts Indicators 1
2
3
4
Did the campus provide regular opportunities for students to participate in fine arts curriculum? Examples: Band concerts - beginner, perform at Family Reading Night, Christmas concert, Spring concert, UIL contests; Theatre Arts - Christmas performance, special performances at pep rallies
Did the campus offer and encourage student involvement in co-curricular fine arts activities? Examples: Band concerts - beginner, perform at Family Reading Night, Christmas concert, Spring concert, UIL contests; Theatre Arts - Christmas performance, special performances at pep rallies
What percentage of students participating in fine arts curriculum were involved in fine arts competitions? Examples: Band concerts - beginner, perform at Family Reading Night, Christmas concert, Spring concert, UIL contests; Theatre Arts - Christmas performance, special performances at pep rallies
Did the campus host Fine Arts events to which the community or parents were invited to attend? Examples: Band concerts - beginner, perform at Family Reading Night, Christmas concert, Spring concert, UIL contests; Theatre Arts - Christmas performance, special performances at pep rallies
0
1
2
3
4
No opportunities for students
1 opportunity for students
5 or more 2 opportunities 4 opportunities opportunities offered for offered for offered for students students students
4
No opportunities for students
5 or more 1 to 2 3 opportunities 4 opportunities opportunities opportunities offered for offered for offered for for students students students students
4
No 1% to 5% of 6% to 9% of 10% to 15% of More than 15% participating FA participating FA participating FA participating FA participating FA students students students students students involved in FA involved in FA involved in FA involved in FA involved in FA competitions competitions competitions competitions competitions
No FA events
1 or 2 FA events
3 FA events
4 FA events
5 or more FA events
Score
4
4
Overall Program Score
4.0
A: ≥ 3.5 | B: ≥ 2.5 and < 3.5 | C: ≥ 1.5 and < 2.5 | D: ≥ 0.5 and < 1.5 | F: < 0.5
Overall Program Letter Grade (for use in 2017-18)
A
Exemplary = A | Recognized = B | Acceptable = C | Unacceptable = D or F
Overall Program Rating (for use in 2016-17)
Exemplary
Community & Student Engagement Performance Evaluation 2016-17 Campus District
Nixon-Smiley Middle School Nixon-Smiley CISD
Wellness and Physical Education Indicators 1
Did the campus participate in the Coordinated Approach to School Health program through PE, cafeteria, classroom and building wide efforts? Examples: Morning announcments, featuring "slow", "go" and "whoa" foods, members of SHAC Committee & Physical Activity and Fitness Sub-committee, SPARK curriculum in PE, participating in daily recess, Mustangs on the Move Fitness Challenge; President's Physical
Did the campus provide opportunities for students and parents to attend events that focused on wellness, emotional health, or overall wellbeing for 2 students? Examples: Coffee Talk w/ Mrs. Clardy, NSCISD Adventure Race in spring, Embody Love Club, No Place for Hate Club,
Did the campus provide opportunities for active employee wellness? 3
Examples: Mustangs on the Move Fitness challenge, monthy wellness updates from campus nurse, notification of Health & Wellness Challenge sponsored by district health insurance company; access to track
0
1
4
Score
4 or more building wide efforts
4
No opportunities for students
4 or more 1 opportunity 2 opportunities 3 opportunities opportunities for students for students for students for students
4
No opportunities for employees
4 or more 1 opportunity 2 opportunities 3 opportunities opportunities for employees for employees for employees for employees
4
No building wide efforts
2
3
1 building wide 2 building wide 3 building wide effort efforts efforts
Overall Program Score
4.0
A: ≥ 3.5 | B: ≥ 2.5 and < 3.5 | C: ≥ 1.5 and < 2.5 | D: ≥ 0.5 and < 1.5 | F: < 0.5
Overall Program Letter Grade (for use in 2017-18)
A
Exemplary = A | Recognized = B | Acceptable = C | Unacceptable = D or F
Overall Program Rating (for use in 2016-17)
Exemplary
Community & Student Engagement Performance Evaluation 2016-17 Campus District
Nixon-Smiley Middle School Nixon-Smiley CISD
Community and Parental Involvement Indicators Did the campus offer opportunities for parents and community volunteers to 1 work in the school in roles or activities that support the needs of the district? Examples: Drug & Alcohol Awareness, Local historian shares town history, classroom volunteer, Wildlife Awareness Presentation, Sexting & Cyberbulling Presentation
Were community or parent representatives encouraged to serve as active participants in campus-level planning such as involvement on the Parent 2 Advisory Committee?
0
1
2
3
4
Score
No opportunities
1 to 2 5 or more 3 opportunities 4 opportunities opportunities opportunities
4
No opportunities
1 to 2 5 or more 3 opportunities 4 opportunities opportunities opportunities
2
Examples: Campus Improvement Plan Committee, LPAC Meetings, Title One Parent Involvement Meetings
3
Did the campus use a variety of communication tools to inform parents of school news and information? Examples: Shared information for District Facebook, District Website, email, teacher communication, flyers/letters home, District marquee, Remind101
4
Did the campus provide parents and community members with opportunities to be involved in classrooms or school events? Examples: Meet the Teacher night, parent meetings, Family Reading Night, Adventure Race, pep rallies, Award Ceremonies
No 1 2 3 4 or more communication communication communication communication communication tools tool tools tools tools
No opportunities
1 to 2 5 or more 3 opportunities 4 opportunities opportunities opportunities
4
4
Overall Program Score
3.5
A: ≥ 3.5 | B: ≥ 2.5 and < 3.5 | C: ≥ 1.5 and < 2.5 | D: ≥ 0.5 and < 1.5 | F: < 0.5
Overall Program Letter Grade (for use in 2017-18)
A
Exemplary = A | Recognized = B | Acceptable = C | Unacceptable = D or F
Overall Program Rating (for use in 2016-17)
Exemplary
Community & Student Engagement Performance Evaluation 2016-17 Campus District
Nixon-Smiley Middle School Nixon-Smiley CISD
21st Century Workforce Development Indicators 1
Did the campus host or participate in college/career activities or opportunities during the current academic year? Examples: College shirt day - every Wednesday, College Tree, guidance lessons, College and Career Day, College & Career Research Project
2
3
Were technology applications integrated and blended into teacher instruction? Examples: iPads, laptops, Chromebooks, SMART boards, Apple TV, Flat screen TVs, Elmos, Google Classroom, Google Apps, Online textbooks, Achieve 3000, IXL - math, language arts, science, ST Math, Study Island
Did the campus give students the opportunity to participate/have access to 21st century learning tools to enhance student engagement/learning? Examples: iPads, Chrome Books, Laptops, Computer Lab, online programs, Google Apps, Google Classroom
0
1
2
3
4
Score
No activities or opportunities
1 activity or opportunity
2 activities or opportunities
3 activities or opportunities
4 activities or opportunities
4
26% to 50% of teachers were observed using technology applications 26% to 50% of students have access to technology for learning
51% to 75% of teachers were observed using technology applications 51% to 75% of students have access to technology for learning
> 75% of teachers were observed using technology applications > 75% of students have access to technology for learning
No teachers Up to 25% of were observed teachers were using observed using technology technology applications applications Up to 25% of Students do not students have have access to access to technology for technology for learning learning
Were students offered the opportunities to participate in Career and > 75% of Technology Education courses, project-based learning opportunities, or other Students were Up to 25% of 26% to 50% of 51% to 75% of students students studentspartici students not offered 4 instructional activities reflecting the needs of 21st century learners? participated in participated in pated in participated in Examples: Principles of Agriculture, Principles of Technology, Principles of Business, Projectbased learning, labs, Online learning - Google Classroom & Google Apps
opportunities
opportunities
opportunities
opportunities
4
4
4
opportunities
Overall Program Score
4.0
A: ≥ 3.5 | B: ≥ 2.5 and < 3.5 | C: ≥ 1.5 and < 2.5 | D: ≥ 0.5 and < 1.5 | F: < 0.5
Overall Program Letter Grade (for use in 2017-18)
A
Exemplary = A | Recognized = B | Acceptable = C | Unacceptable = D or F
Overall Program Rating (for use in 2016-17)
Exemplary
Community & Student Engagement Performance Evaluation 2016-17 Campus District
Nixon-Smiley Middle School Nixon-Smiley CISD
Second Language Acquisition Indicators Did English Language Learners (ELLs) on campus meet or exceed progress on 1 STAAR? Data from 2016 STAAR for math & reading = 49%
2
Did campus staff participate in yearly ELPS Instruction training and LPAC training as applicable? Examples: LPAC training as required, ELPS Instruction training for all
3
Did ELL students on campus demonstrate development in progress as it relates to TELPAS? Met is maintaining composit TELPAS rating and exceed is increasing one or more rating level.
0
1
2
3
4
Score
0% met or exceeded progress
1% to 20% met or exceeded progress
21% to 40% met or exceeded progress
41% to 60% met or exceeded progress
> 60% met or exceeded progress
3
0% trained in ELPS Instruction
1% to 20% 21% to 40% 41% to 60% trained in ELPS trained in ELPS trained in ELPS Instruction Instruction Instruction
> 60% trained in ELPS Instruction
4
Below state standard
1% to 20% met or exceeded progress
21% to 40% met or exceeded progress
> 60% met or exceeded progress
4
41% to 60% met or exceeded progress
Overall Program Score
3.7
A: ≥ 3.5 | B: ≥ 2.5 and < 3.5 | C: ≥ 1.5 and < 2.5 | D: ≥ 0.5 and < 1.5 | F: < 0.5
Overall Program Letter Grade (for use in 2017-18)
A
Exemplary = A | Recognized = B | Acceptable = C | Unacceptable = D or F
Overall Program Rating (for use in 2016-17)
Exemplary
Community & Student Engagement Performance Evaluation 2016-17 Campus District
Nixon-Smiley Middle School Nixon-Smiley CISD
Digital Learning Environment Indicators
1
Did the campus provide digital learning professional development opportunities for teachers? Examples: Read,Write, Gold, QuickTime, DMAC, Achieve 3000, ST Math
2
Do parents have access to online resources to monitor student learning and progress? Examples: Gradebook Parent Portal, Achieve 3000 Parent Log In, Remind101
3
Do teachers regularly integrate use of technology and digital learning resources during classroom instruction? Examples: teacher webpage, online textbooks, Achieve 3000, IXL Math, Language Arts & Science, ST Math, Study Island, Edusmart Science
Do all students have access to technology for learning in the classroom? 4 Examples: iPads, Chrombooks, Laptops
0
1
2
3
4
Score
No teachers participated in at least 3 hours of instructional technology PD
1% to 20% of teachers participated in at least 3 hours of instructional technology PD
21% to 40% of teachers participated in at least 3 hours of instructional technology PD
41% to 60% of teachers participated in at least 3 hours of instructional technology PD
> 60% of teachers participated in at least 3 hours of instructional technology PD
4
No parents 0% to 20% of 21% to 40% of 41% to 60% of > 60% of have access to parents have parents have parents have parents have online access to online access to online access to online access to online resources to resources to resources to resources to resources to monitor monitor monitor monitor monitor learning learning learning learning learning
4
1% to 20% of 21% to 40% of No teachers teachers were teachers were were observed observed observed integrating integrating integrating technology and technology and technology and digital learning digital learning digital learning resources resources resources 1% to 20% of 21% to 40% of No students students have students have have access to access to access to technology for technology for technology for learning in the learning in the learning in the classroom classroom classroom
41% to 60% of teachers were observed integrating technology and digital learning resources 41% to 60% of students have access to technology for learning in the classroom
> 60% of teachers were observed integrating technology and digital learning resources > 60% of students have access to technology for learning in the classroom
4
4
Overall Program Score
4.0
A: ≥ 3.5 | B: ≥ 2.5 and < 3.5 | C: ≥ 1.5 and < 2.5 | D: ≥ 0.5 and < 1.5 | F: < 0.5
Overall Program Letter Grade (for use in 2017-18)
A
Exemplary = A | Recognized = B | Acceptable = C | Unacceptable = D or F
Overall Program Rating (for use in 2016-17)
Exemplary
Community & Student Engagement Performance Evaluation 2016-17 Campus District
Nixon-Smiley Middle School Nixon-Smiley CISD
Dropout Prevention Strategies Indicators Does the campus offer clubs/organizations for students? 1 Examples: Embody Love Club, No Place for Hate, Kung Foo Club, Newsletter Club, Student Council, National Junior Honor Society, Mustangs on the Move
2
Does the campus offer multiple opportunities for students to participate in college/career readiness activities? Example: career day, career explorations, college days, monthly guidance lessons, Advisory period
Does the campus actively review campus attendance data? 3
4
Data Sources: TxEIS, eSPED, individual student documentation with pattern of absences, daily review of absences and parent communication, teacher review every three week grading period, PBIS
Does the campus attempt to schedule conferences with parents/students who are having attendance issues?
0
1
2
3
4
Score
1 to 2 3 to 4 5 to 6 7 or more No clubs/organclubs/organclubs/organclubs/organclubs/organizations offered izations offered izations offered izations offered izations offered
4
1% to 20% of 21% to 40% of 41% to 60% of > 60% of No students students students students students participated in participated in participated in participated in participated in a CCR activity at least 1 CCR at least 1 CCR at least 1 CCR at least 1 CCR activity activity activity activity
4
No regular reviews
At the end of the semester
At the end of each grading period
Monthly
Weekly
4
No regular attempts
At the end of the semester
At the end of each grading period
Monthly
Weekly
4
Overall Program Score
4.0
A: ≥ 3.5 | B: ≥ 2.5 and < 3.5 | C: ≥ 1.5 and < 2.5 | D: ≥ 0.5 and < 1.5 | F: < 0.5
Overall Program Letter Grade (for use in 2017-18)
A
Exemplary = A | Recognized = B | Acceptable = C | Unacceptable = D or F
Overall Program Rating (for use in 2016-17)
Exemplary
Community & Student Engagement Performance Evaluation 2016-17 Campus District
Nixon-Smiley Middle School Nixon-Smiley CISD
Gifted and Talented Indicators
1
2
3
4
Score
100% of GT 100% of GT teachers met teachers met state state requirements requirements plus 6 or more plus 12 or more additional additional hours of hours of training training
3
The campus did 7 or more not provide 1 or 2 identified 3 or 4 identified 5 or 6 identified identified information opportunities opportunities opportunities opportunities about the GT were provided were provided were provided were provided program to to parents to parents to parents to parents parents
2
More than 7 No identified 1 to 2 identified 3 to 4 identified 5 to 6 identified identified types types of types of types of types of of opportunities opportunities opportunities opportunities opportunities were provided were provided were provided were provided were provided to students to students to students to students to students
3
Overall Program Score
2.7
A: ≥ 3.5 | B: ≥ 2.5 and < 3.5 | C: ≥ 1.5 and < 2.5 | D: ≥ 0.5 and < 1.5 | F: < 0.5
Overall Program Letter Grade (for use in 2017-18)
B
Exemplary = A | Recognized = B | Acceptable = C | Unacceptable = D or F
Overall Program Rating (for use in 2016-17)
Recognized
Do teachers on campus meet minumum state GT training requirements? 1
2
0
Do parents of GT students have opportunities to learn about the GT program during the school year? Examples: Letter home, GT Showcase Event(s)
Is the GT curriculum designed to meet the social, emotional, and learning needs of the gifted including opportunities such as project-based learning, 3 collaborative team-work, learning perseverance, time management, organization, and goal setting? Examples: Mock election, create perfect utopia,"Was Museum" - significance person made in world, work individually, pairs, small groups, class decides topics and how far to delve into
< 100% GT GT teachers did teachers met not meet state minimum state requirements GT training of 12 hours of requirements training
100% of GT teachers met state requirements of 12 hours of training
