Consequences of Budget Cuts

Report 2 Downloads 95 Views
GCA Education Services

“Consequences of Budget Cuts” November 17, 2014 www.gcaservices.com

Introduc)ons   Dr. Patrick Miller, Superintendent Greene County Schools

Russell Leboff Regional VP Sales

Fred Clark, Senior VP Sales & Marketing

Donnie Cherry, Senior Sales Director, Western, NC

Michael Johnson, Senior Sales Director, Eastern NC

2  

About  GCA  

♦   #1

Rank

among school districts (3,000+)

♦  48

States & Puerto Rico

♦  98%

Retention record

♦ 300+

Education Partners

3  

                                         What  Your  Neighboring  States  Are  Doing  

17 6 42

17

4  

GCA  Partnerships  

5

5  

Budget  Challenges  

6  

                                                       Reality  of  Budget  Cuts   ♦  Drop  in  property  taxes   ♦  Reduced  local,  state  and  federal  funding   ♦  County  commissioners  not  willing  to  support   current  budgets  or  long  range  capital  needs  

♦  This  makes  it  all  the  more  important  for  you  to   find  areas  to  reduce  spending  that  don’t   nega@vely  impact  student  achievement.    

♦   What  happens  aDer  you  have  made  all  the  easy   cuts,  Are  There  Any  Easy  Cuts?    

 

7  

                                                       Consequences  of  Budget  Cuts   ♦  Funding  levels  @  2008  levels   ♦  Reduc@on  in  teachers  &  teacher   assistants  

♦  BeLer  teachers  leaving  the  state  or  the   profession  altogether  

♦  Reduc@on  in  custodial,  maintenance   and  grounds  staff  

♦  Moving  opera@ons  staff  to  10-­‐11  month   employees  

♦  Inability  to  maintain  facili@es  and   purchase  capital  equipment  

8  

                                                       Consequences  of  Budget  Cuts  

Have you considered that… Cuts to facility services can have an indirect, yet significant negative effect on your educational goals?

9  

WHAT YOU NEED TO ACCOMPLISH Reduce maintenance and operations costs while improving quality

1 Find cost savings to invest where it matters

2 Delegate facilities tasks distracting you from your core

3 Measure and improve your program performance 10

1

2

3

WHAT IF … ? What if you don’t have to sacrifice programs or compromise your core mission to meet financial constraints? 11

With GCA, you can shrink your maintenance and operations costs by 20% and use those savings to make investments that will reach your core goals. Plus, you won’t sacrifice quality, you’ll actually improve it.

12

1

2

3

1 WHAT IF … ? What if you could find cost savings to invest where it matters?

13

Common  Threads  to  All  ANri)on    Models        

♦  Current  employees  keep  their  jobs   ♦  District  determines  employees  that  move  to  GCA’s   payroll  based  on  tenure  

♦  District  determines  what  wage  and  benefit  package   current  employees  receive  

♦  GCA  supervises  all  employees   ♦  GCA  ensures  all  district  staff  follow  HR  protocol   ♦  Reduces  District’s  workers  compensa@on  premiums   and  claims    

♦  Implementa@on  of  Quality  Assurance  Program  

14  

     

Maintenance  Program  Objec)ves  

 

♦  Implement  a  proac@ve  maintenance   program  

♦  Implement  an  effec@ve  preven@ve   maintenance  program  

♦  Control  Cost  (stewardship  of  district’s   budget)  

♦  Reduce  facili@es  related  demands  on   school  administra@on  

♦  Implement  Computerized  Maintenance  

Management  System  (CMMS)  School  Dude  

♦  Asset  inventory  and  tagging   ♦  Complete  review  of  third  party  contracts,   typical  savings  20+%       15  

       

Custodial  Program  Objec)ves  

 

♦  Provide  a  dedicated  management  team  to  your  district   24/7/365  

♦  Improve  cleanliness  levels,  standard  cleaning  specs   across  district  

♦  Provide  training  to  all  employees   ♦  Purchase  state  of  the  art  equipment  package  and   provide  ALL  supplies  

♦  GCA  responsible  for  all  equipment  repairs  and   replacement  

♦  Implement  Green  Cleaning  program  in  support  of   sustainability  

♦  Implement  “Customer  Sa@sfac@on”  Surveys   ♦  Principals  becomes  a  customer  of  the  custodial   program  –  not  the  manager  

16        

Grounds  Program  Objec)ves    

♦  Create  “Curb  Appeal”  at  all  district  facili@es   ♦  Determine  cut  schedule,  example  7day   ♦  Dedicated  grounds  manager  for  your  district   ♦  Provide  training  to  all  employees   ♦  Purchase    new  grounds    equipment  package  and   provide  ALL  supplies  

♦  GCA  responsible  for  all  equipment  repairs  and   replacement  

♦  Purchase  exis@ng  equipment  when  possible       17        

Quality  Assurance   Inspec@ons  and  Work  Order  Management   ♦ Site  Managers  are  required  to     proac@vely   inspect  schools;  we   inspect     our  work    

♦ Tablets  u@lized  to  complete  

  Quality   Assurance  Inspec@ons  for   Maintenance,  Custodial  and   Grounds  Services  

♦ All  areas  of  the  schools  are   inventory  and  inspected  

♦ Data  indicates  staff  training  and   development  opportuni@es  

♦ Proac@vely  inspec@on  of  schools  

leads  to  increases  in  self-­‐generated   work  orders   18  

Quality  Assurance   Inspec@ons  and  Work  Order  Management        

 

19  

Customer  Sa)sfac)on  Survey    

Facilities  Custodial   Operations   Services and  Maintenance

 Monthly  Report    Monthly   Card Report  Card

 

Please  rate  each  cPlease   ategory   rate   with   each   a  letter   category   grade   wtith   hat   ar  lepresents   etter  grade   your   that   perception   represents  oyf  our   the  p services   erception   received   of  the  services  received   ("A"  being  the  highest   ("A"   score   being   possible) the  highest  score  possible)

♦  Customer  provides  feedback  monthly   ♦  Ac@on  plan  development   ♦  BeLer  communica@ons     ♦  Ensures  accountability   ♦  Improves  service  levels    

Building  /  School  Name Building  /  School  Name

Completed  by

Completed  by

Date

Date

1

Rate  the  professionalism   Did  you  off  ind   the   the   Custodial   "Maintenance   Staff.  WCere   all-­‐In   they   Line"   in  uaniform;   nd/or  w   eb  requestor  to  be   1 B A were  they  courteous;   user  eftc? riendly?

C

A D

EB

C

D

E

2

Rate  the  professionalism   Rate  the   op f  rofessionalism   the  Management   of  sthe   taff.   Repair   Did  they   Technicians.   sign  in/out   Did   of  they  sign  in/out  of   2 B A the  building;  were  the   they   building;   courteous;   were   did   they   they   in  fuollowup   niform;    awppropriately;   ere  they  courteous;   etc? etc?

C

A D

EB

C

D

E

3

Rate  the  professionalism  of  the  Management  staff.  Did  they  sign  in/out  of   3 B A Rate  the  cleanliness   of  the  Athletic  Facilities. the  building;  were  they  courteous;  did  they  followup  appropriately;  etc?

C

A D

EB

C

D

E

4

4 Rate   Rate  the  cleanliness   of  the  rCesponse   afeteria.  time  to  repair  requests.

A

B

C

A D

EB

C

D

E

5

5 Rate   Rate  the  cleanliness   of  tChe   lassrooms. quality  of  work  completed  by  the  maintenance  staff.  

A

B

C

A D

EB

C

D

E

6

6 Is  tohe   Rate  the  cleanliness   f  Hcallyways.   limate  appropriate  (air  conditioning  /  heat)?

A

B

C

A D

EB

C

D

E

7

Rate  the  maintenance  department's  ability  to  resolve  problem  /  overcome   7 B A Rate  the  cleanliness   of  Offices. challenges.

C

A D

EB

C

D

E

8

8 Rate   Rate  the  cleanliness   of  tRhe   estrooms   pro-­‐active   (stock   nature   of  so oap   f  maaintenance   nd  paper). department.

A

B

C

A D

EB

C

D

E

9

9 Rate   Rate  the  cleanliness   of  tShe   chool   overall   Perimeter. functionality    of  building  systems.

A

B

C

A D

EB

C

D

E

10

Rate  the  overall  10quality   Rate  tohe   f  coustodial   verall  quality   services. of  maintenance  services.

A

B

C

A D

EB

C

D

E

Average  score

4.00

Average  score

4.00

Comments Comments

Signature  of  client  liaison Signature  of  client  liaison

Date

Date

20  

Joint  Review  CommiNee  Mee)ng  (JRC)  

   

♦  JRC’s  are  held  quarterly  with  GCA  team   and  district  administra@on  

♦  Ensures  the  services  are  mee@ng  and   exceeding  district  expecta@ons  

♦  Results  of  previous  goals  are  reviewed  

and  new  goals  for  the  upcoming  period   are  established  

♦  Over  a  period  they  serve  as  a  ‘record  of   stewardship’  regarding  the  services   GCA  is  providing  

 

21  

Employee Appreciation

22  

Employee  Recogni)on    

♦  Employee  of  the  Month  for  each  service  line   ♦  School  of  the  Month  for  custodial  services   ♦  Employee  of  the  Year  for  each  service  line   ♦  School  of  the  year  for  custodial  services   ♦  Recogni@on  &  team-­‐building  events   ♦  Opportunity  for  promo@ons  and  advancement    

   

23  

Greene  County  Schools    

♦  Partnered  with  Greene  County  Schools  in  June   2012  

♦  Dr.  Miller  protected  district  employees     ♦  GCA  filled  open  posi@ons  and  supervises  all   employees.  Fill  vacancies  through  aLri@on  

♦  Provide  Custodial  &  Grounds  Services   ♦  Improved  custodial  quality  and  created  “curb   appeal”  at  all  facili@es  

♦  Customer  sa@sfac@on  average  is  93+%        

24  

Pender  County  Schools    

♦  Partnered  with  Pender  County  Schools  in  November   2007  

♦  Provide  custodial  services     ♦  In  2005,  district  went  with  low  bid  in  RFP  process  and   first  two  vendors  failed.  

♦  GCA  has  provided  services  for  the  last  7  years     ♦  BOE  approved  a  five  year  extension  without  an  RFP   process  in  2012  

♦  Five  custodians  remain  on  district  payroll   ♦  Customer  sa@sfac@on    average  is  93+%        

25  

Stafford  County  Schools  

 

♦  Partnered  with  GCA  in  2007  with  handful  of   loca@ons,  others  with  SSC  

♦  Provide  custodial  services   ♦  Quickly  recognized  as  premier  provider  –  now   their  only  provider  

♦  Staff  aLri@on  model  –  added  schools  annually  –   now  up  to  30  

♦  Very  sa@sfied  partner   ♦  Renewed  contract  in  2012  for  5  more  years   ♦  Example  of  savings,  efficiencies  and  staff-­‐centric   plan  

     

26  

  Why  GCA  is  the  Best  Solu)on  for  Your  District   ♦  Transi)on  experience  –  assisted  over  80  school  district  convert  their   programs.  Ability  to  tailor  a  program  specifically  for  your  district  

♦  Most  experienced  –    most  partners,  approximately  4  @mes  more  partners   than  next  closest  compe@tor  

♦  Leadership  that  is  experienced,  proven  and  ready  to  start   ♦  Improvements  in  safety,  cleanliness,  appearance,  consistency,  reduc@on  of   equipment  failures,  increased  energy  efficiency,  protect  life  expectancy  of   equipment  

♦  Your  District  goals  are  our  goals   ♦  We  can  grow  with  you…  many  others  can’t.  We  can  also  do  …   —  Long  range  capitol  planning   —  Energy  Management  

 

27  

Q  &  A  

28