GCA Education Services
“Consequences of Budget Cuts” November 17, 2014 www.gcaservices.com
Introduc)ons Dr. Patrick Miller, Superintendent Greene County Schools
Russell Leboff Regional VP Sales
Fred Clark, Senior VP Sales & Marketing
Donnie Cherry, Senior Sales Director, Western, NC
Michael Johnson, Senior Sales Director, Eastern NC
2
About GCA
♦ #1
Rank
among school districts (3,000+)
♦ 48
States & Puerto Rico
♦ 98%
Retention record
♦ 300+
Education Partners
3
What Your Neighboring States Are Doing
17 6 42
17
4
GCA Partnerships
5
5
Budget Challenges
6
Reality of Budget Cuts ♦ Drop in property taxes ♦ Reduced local, state and federal funding ♦ County commissioners not willing to support current budgets or long range capital needs
♦ This makes it all the more important for you to find areas to reduce spending that don’t nega@vely impact student achievement.
♦ What happens aDer you have made all the easy cuts, Are There Any Easy Cuts?
7
Consequences of Budget Cuts ♦ Funding levels @ 2008 levels ♦ Reduc@on in teachers & teacher assistants
♦ BeLer teachers leaving the state or the profession altogether
♦ Reduc@on in custodial, maintenance and grounds staff
♦ Moving opera@ons staff to 10-‐11 month employees
♦ Inability to maintain facili@es and purchase capital equipment
8
Consequences of Budget Cuts
Have you considered that… Cuts to facility services can have an indirect, yet significant negative effect on your educational goals?
9
WHAT YOU NEED TO ACCOMPLISH Reduce maintenance and operations costs while improving quality
1 Find cost savings to invest where it matters
2 Delegate facilities tasks distracting you from your core
3 Measure and improve your program performance 10
1
2
3
WHAT IF … ? What if you don’t have to sacrifice programs or compromise your core mission to meet financial constraints? 11
With GCA, you can shrink your maintenance and operations costs by 20% and use those savings to make investments that will reach your core goals. Plus, you won’t sacrifice quality, you’ll actually improve it.
12
1
2
3
1 WHAT IF … ? What if you could find cost savings to invest where it matters?
13
Common Threads to All ANri)on Models
♦ Current employees keep their jobs ♦ District determines employees that move to GCA’s payroll based on tenure
♦ District determines what wage and benefit package current employees receive
♦ GCA supervises all employees ♦ GCA ensures all district staff follow HR protocol ♦ Reduces District’s workers compensa@on premiums and claims
♦ Implementa@on of Quality Assurance Program
14
Maintenance Program Objec)ves
♦ Implement a proac@ve maintenance program
♦ Implement an effec@ve preven@ve maintenance program
♦ Control Cost (stewardship of district’s budget)
♦ Reduce facili@es related demands on school administra@on
♦ Implement Computerized Maintenance
Management System (CMMS) School Dude
♦ Asset inventory and tagging ♦ Complete review of third party contracts, typical savings 20+% 15
Custodial Program Objec)ves
♦ Provide a dedicated management team to your district 24/7/365
♦ Improve cleanliness levels, standard cleaning specs across district
♦ Provide training to all employees ♦ Purchase state of the art equipment package and provide ALL supplies
♦ GCA responsible for all equipment repairs and replacement
♦ Implement Green Cleaning program in support of sustainability
♦ Implement “Customer Sa@sfac@on” Surveys ♦ Principals becomes a customer of the custodial program – not the manager
16
Grounds Program Objec)ves
♦ Create “Curb Appeal” at all district facili@es ♦ Determine cut schedule, example 7day ♦ Dedicated grounds manager for your district ♦ Provide training to all employees ♦ Purchase new grounds equipment package and provide ALL supplies
♦ GCA responsible for all equipment repairs and replacement
♦ Purchase exis@ng equipment when possible 17
Quality Assurance Inspec@ons and Work Order Management ♦ Site Managers are required to proac@vely inspect schools; we inspect our work
♦ Tablets u@lized to complete
Quality Assurance Inspec@ons for Maintenance, Custodial and Grounds Services
♦ All areas of the schools are inventory and inspected
♦ Data indicates staff training and development opportuni@es
♦ Proac@vely inspec@on of schools
leads to increases in self-‐generated work orders 18
Quality Assurance Inspec@ons and Work Order Management
19
Customer Sa)sfac)on Survey
Facilities Custodial Operations Services and Maintenance
Monthly Report Monthly Card Report Card
Please rate each cPlease ategory rate with each a letter category grade wtith hat ar lepresents etter grade your that perception represents oyf our the p services erception received of the services received ("A" being the highest ("A" score being possible) the highest score possible)
♦ Customer provides feedback monthly ♦ Ac@on plan development ♦ BeLer communica@ons ♦ Ensures accountability ♦ Improves service levels
Building / School Name Building / School Name
Completed by
Completed by
Date
Date
1
Rate the professionalism Did you off ind the the Custodial "Maintenance Staff. WCere all-‐In they Line" in uaniform; nd/or w eb requestor to be 1 B A were they courteous; user eftc? riendly?
C
A D
EB
C
D
E
2
Rate the professionalism Rate the op f rofessionalism the Management of sthe taff. Repair Did they Technicians. sign in/out Did of they sign in/out of 2 B A the building; were the they building; courteous; were did they they in fuollowup niform; awppropriately; ere they courteous; etc? etc?
C
A D
EB
C
D
E
3
Rate the professionalism of the Management staff. Did they sign in/out of 3 B A Rate the cleanliness of the Athletic Facilities. the building; were they courteous; did they followup appropriately; etc?
C
A D
EB
C
D
E
4
4 Rate Rate the cleanliness of the rCesponse afeteria. time to repair requests.
A
B
C
A D
EB
C
D
E
5
5 Rate Rate the cleanliness of tChe lassrooms. quality of work completed by the maintenance staff.
A
B
C
A D
EB
C
D
E
6
6 Is tohe Rate the cleanliness f Hcallyways. limate appropriate (air conditioning / heat)?
A
B
C
A D
EB
C
D
E
7
Rate the maintenance department's ability to resolve problem / overcome 7 B A Rate the cleanliness of Offices. challenges.
C
A D
EB
C
D
E
8
8 Rate Rate the cleanliness of tRhe estrooms pro-‐active (stock nature of so oap f maaintenance nd paper). department.
A
B
C
A D
EB
C
D
E
9
9 Rate Rate the cleanliness of tShe chool overall Perimeter. functionality of building systems.
A
B
C
A D
EB
C
D
E
10
Rate the overall 10quality Rate tohe f coustodial verall quality services. of maintenance services.
A
B
C
A D
EB
C
D
E
Average score
4.00
Average score
4.00
Comments Comments
Signature of client liaison Signature of client liaison
Date
Date
20
Joint Review CommiNee Mee)ng (JRC)
♦ JRC’s are held quarterly with GCA team and district administra@on
♦ Ensures the services are mee@ng and exceeding district expecta@ons
♦ Results of previous goals are reviewed
and new goals for the upcoming period are established
♦ Over a period they serve as a ‘record of stewardship’ regarding the services GCA is providing
21
Employee Appreciation
22
Employee Recogni)on
♦ Employee of the Month for each service line ♦ School of the Month for custodial services ♦ Employee of the Year for each service line ♦ School of the year for custodial services ♦ Recogni@on & team-‐building events ♦ Opportunity for promo@ons and advancement
23
Greene County Schools
♦ Partnered with Greene County Schools in June 2012
♦ Dr. Miller protected district employees ♦ GCA filled open posi@ons and supervises all employees. Fill vacancies through aLri@on
♦ Provide Custodial & Grounds Services ♦ Improved custodial quality and created “curb appeal” at all facili@es
♦ Customer sa@sfac@on average is 93+%
24
Pender County Schools
♦ Partnered with Pender County Schools in November 2007
♦ Provide custodial services ♦ In 2005, district went with low bid in RFP process and first two vendors failed.
♦ GCA has provided services for the last 7 years ♦ BOE approved a five year extension without an RFP process in 2012
♦ Five custodians remain on district payroll ♦ Customer sa@sfac@on average is 93+%
25
Stafford County Schools
♦ Partnered with GCA in 2007 with handful of loca@ons, others with SSC
♦ Provide custodial services ♦ Quickly recognized as premier provider – now their only provider
♦ Staff aLri@on model – added schools annually – now up to 30
♦ Very sa@sfied partner ♦ Renewed contract in 2012 for 5 more years ♦ Example of savings, efficiencies and staff-‐centric plan
26
Why GCA is the Best Solu)on for Your District ♦ Transi)on experience – assisted over 80 school district convert their programs. Ability to tailor a program specifically for your district
♦ Most experienced – most partners, approximately 4 @mes more partners than next closest compe@tor
♦ Leadership that is experienced, proven and ready to start ♦ Improvements in safety, cleanliness, appearance, consistency, reduc@on of equipment failures, increased energy efficiency, protect life expectancy of equipment
♦ Your District goals are our goals ♦ We can grow with you… many others can’t. We can also do … — Long range capitol planning — Energy Management
27
Q & A
28