Harmonizing Global Crop Protection AWS
Harmonizing Global Crop Protection Biopesticides
Biologicals Biostimulants St Louis, MO USA
Moving from Crop Care to Crop Enhancement: NewLeaf’s Prescriptive Biologics™ Platform Crop enhancement 150+%
Crop Care Pest Control
Secure yield 100%
52%
Crop yield Without plant protection
Avoid loss cause by pest, weed and disease.
TODAY
Crop yield With plant protection
Biological Inputs Simultaneously 1) protecting the crop, 2) protecting agronomic inputs: traits/ chemistry), 3) Integrating food production with ecological concerns: Carbon/Nitrogen/Water
Achievable crop yield
Epiphytic and Endophytic Occurrence of NLS Methylobacteria on Axenic Soybean
20cm
NewLeaf Culture Collection NLS BioStimulant Peanut + Rhizobium State Regulated Channel Product In-Furrow application
NLS Biofungicides Registered Product US EPA/PMRA/ etc.
NLS Bio Inoculant Soy Seed Treatment Product State Regulated Big-Ag Bio-Product
4
NLS Bioinsecticides Nematicides US EPA/PMRA/etc.
Bu/acre
Rhizobia-Methylobacterium Compatibility: Soybean -- 6 Locations
Rhizobia
5
PPFM
Rhizobia and PPFM
Sustainability: Corn Root Worm Active NLS Strains • $Billion pest problem currently managed with GMO corn seed. • CRW evolving resistance to existing traits: new traits being introduced and conventional chemistry is being used. • New EPA rules being promoted placing management in to the stakeholders (manufactures) control.
• Tritrophic level interaction between the host crop, the microbiome (PPFM) and the pest. • Healthy plants appear to 'outgrow' CRW feeding.
• Co-application of PPFMs can reduce conventional pesticide use and help protect existing traits.
Roots of untreated corn plant
Roots of PPFM-treated corn
Corn Root Worm Trials: 2013, 2014, 2015 & 2016 1.8
180
1.6 1.4
175
1.2 1 0.8
170
165
0.6 0.4
Yield (bu/A)
2016: Significant yield differences in traited vs. untraited seed (13 bu/A)
Root Damage Effect on Yield 2015 Root Injury 0-3 Iowa State Scale
2015: Strain (E) at 1.0L/acre in furrow (I-F) delivered 13.0 bu/A (8.0%) advantage to check
160
0.2 0
155
7
Biologicals Biostimulants St Louis, MO USA
Moving from Crop Care to Crop Enhancement: NewLeaf’s Prescriptive Biologics™ Platform Crop enhancement 150+%
Crop Care Pest Control
Secure yield 100%
52%
Crop yield Without plant protection
Avoid loss cause by pest, weed and disease.
TODAY
Crop yield With plant protection
Biological Inputs Simultaneously 1) protecting the crop, 2) protecting agronomic inputs: traits/ chemistry), 3) Integrating food production with ecological concerns: Carbon/Nitrogen/Water
Achievable crop yield
Epiphytic and Endophytic Occurrence of NLS Methylobacteria on Axenic Soybean
20cm
NewLeaf Culture Collection NLS BioStimulant Peanut + Rhizobium State Regulated Channel Product In-Furrow application
NLS Biofungicides Registered Product US EPA/PMRA/ etc.
NLS Bio Inoculant Soy Seed Treatment Product State Regulated Big-Ag Bio-Product
4
NLS Bioinsecticides Nematicides US EPA/PMRA/etc.
Bu/acre
Rhizobia-Methylobacterium Compatibility: Soybean -- 6 Locations
Rhizobia
5
PPFM
Rhizobia and PPFM
Sustainability: Corn Root Worm Active NLS Strains • $Billion pest problem currently managed with GMO corn seed. • CRW evolving resistance to existing traits: new traits being introduced and conventional chemistry is being used. • New EPA rules being promoted placing management in to the stakeholders (manufactures) control.
• Tritrophic level interaction between the host crop, the microbiome (PPFM) and the pest. • Healthy plants appear to 'outgrow' CRW feeding.
• Co-application of PPFMs can reduce conventional pesticide use and help protect existing traits.
Roots of untreated corn plant
Roots of PPFM-treated corn
Corn Root Worm Trials: 2013, 2014, 2015 & 2016 1.8
180
1.6 1.4
175
1.2 1 0.8
170
165
0.6 0.4
Yield (bu/A)
2016: Significant yield differences in traited vs. untraited seed (13 bu/A)
Root Damage Effect on Yield 2015 Root Injury 0-3 Iowa State Scale
2015: Strain (E) at 1.0L/acre in furrow (I-F) delivered 13.0 bu/A (8.0%) advantage to check
160
0.2 0
155
7
