Sweetwater County School District #1 PAWS Results
Sweetwater County School District #1 PAWS Results Wanda Maloney Chief Academic Of>icer August 8, 2016
Agenda item 8-b page 1
Vision Statement: As an innovative district, united with our community, we empower and inspire all students to academic excellence in pursuit of their interests and passions. Mission Statement: To provide a quality education for all students. We will accomplish this by: • Making students our first priority. • Utilizing community partnerships. • Promoting professional excellence. • Being a board committed to excellence in education. • Providing a safe, orderly and efficient environment.
Agenda item 8-b page 2
Purpose • Evaluate SCSD#1 PAWS assessment data • Review SCSD#1 celebrations and next steps • Review upcoming revisions to the statewide assessment system
Agenda item 8-b page 3
What is PAWS (Pro>iciency Assessments for Wyoming Students)? • Wyoming state assessment • Multiple choice questions • Students in grades 3-8 take reading and math tests • Students in 4th and 8th grades also take a science test • Administered during March • Used to foster program improvement at the school, district and state level • Meets the federal accountability law
Agenda item 8-b page 4
Vision Statement
Mission Statement To provide a quality education for all students.
As an innovative district, united with our community, we empower and inspire all students to academic excellence in pursuit of their interests and passions.
Academic Visioning Curriculum Mapping • Instructional Teacher Leaders • Instructional Coaches • Lesson planning and quality Instruction • Professional Development
Systematic process • Math • PE & Health • ELA (draft) • Info Lit (draft) • Foreign Language (draft)
Assessment System • District Common Assessments • District Assessment Plan
Communication • Stakeholder Involvement • Community Curriculum Council (CCC) • Parent/Teacher Survey Data
Vision Statement: As an innovative district, united with our community, we empower and inspire all students to academic excellence in pursuit of their interests and passions. Agenda item 8-b page 5
AdvancED Improvement Priority Establish a systemic process, guided by the purpose and direction of the district, that will ensure horizontal and vertical alignment of curriculum, assessment, and instruction.
District Improvement Achievement Goal All students will be pro>icient or advanced in reading, math and science as determined by state assessment results. Milestones Results SCSD#1 will see a 5% increase in pro>iciency in Math, Reading and Science in all grade levels during the 2015/2016 School year.
District goal was met in: 3rd grade math 4th grade math 5th grade math 7th grade math 6th grade reading
Agenda item 8-b page 6
Sweetwater County School District #1 PAWS Math Results
Agenda item 8-b page 7
Sweetwater County School District #1 PAWS Math Results Sweetwater Count School District #1 PAWS Math Results July 14, 2016 Grade Level/Subject Area 3rd Grade Math 2013-2014 3rd Grade Math 2014-2015 3rd Grade Math 2015-2016 4th Grade Math 2013-2014 4th Grade Math 2014-2015 4th Grade Math 2015-2016 5th Grade Math 2013-2014 5th Grade Math 2014-2015 5th Grade Math 2015-2016 6th Grade Math 2013-2014 6th Grade Math 2014-2015 6th Grade Math 2015-2016
State 50.8% 49.48% 52.94%
SCSD#1 43.01% 45.38% 52.57%
State 47.02% 50.58% 55.18%
SCSD#1 37.62% 41.59% 47.24%
State
SCSD#1
54.3% 52.64% 56.31%
40% 41.03% 47.29%
State 48.94% 49.47% 49.79%
SCSD#1 36.24% 39.64% 39.47%
7th Grade Math 2013-2014
State 43.37%
SCSD#1 36.82%
7th Grade Math 2014-2015 7th Grade Math 2015-2016
43.39% 49.38%
41.12% 45.98%
8th Grade Math 2013-2014
State 49.70%
SCSD#1 52.99%
8th Grade Math 2014-2015 8th Grade Math 2015-2016
47.44% 47.88%
44.53% 44.84%
District Increase or Decrease
DES 33.33%
DV 42.19% 40.74% 39.13%
FEES 62.50% 80.00% 50.00%
LIN 9.09% 50.00% 68.75%*
NP 56.67% 49.25% 53.13%*
OV 42.03% 45.45% 66.67%*
SA 43.37% 41.18% 65.63%*
SC 36.46%
WA 34.43% 37.88% 69.81%*
WR 48.24% 50.00% 35.59%
DES
DV 20.29% 25.40% 61.02%*
FEES 69.23% 75.00% 66.67%*
LIN 57.14% 41.30%
NP 30.91% 55.56% 29.49%
OV 17.65% 27.03% 42.86%
SA 29.21% 35.96% 50.00%
SC 39.47%
WA 40.32% 42.03% 76.19%*
WR 67.82% 57.50% 50.00%
FEES 90.00% 90.00% 90.00%*
ES 36.55% 34.85% 50.00%
PB 41.71% 42.49% 43.05%
DES 62.50%
FEMS 71.43% 83.33% 50.00%*
ES 25.82% 34.36% 32.80%
PB 44.29% 42.44% 43.63%
DMS 40.00%
FEMS 36.84%
RSJH 36.77%
20.00%
44.44% 56.25%*
41.50% 45.43%
DMS 57.14%
FEMS 71.43%
RSJH 52.58%
42.86%
44.44% 46.15%
44.32% 44.84%
7.19% District Increase or Decrease
33.33% 5.65% District Increase or Decrease
DES
6.26%
33.33%
District Increase or Decrease
-0.17% District Increase or Decrease
4.86% District Increase or Decrease
0.31%
* indicates performance higher than the state average.
Vision Statement: As an innovative district, united with our community, we empower and inspire all students to academic excellence in pursuit of their interests and passions. Agenda item 8-b page 8
At-Risk Student Math Results Sweetwater County School District #1 PAWS Sweetwater County School District #1 PAWS Sweetwater Count School District #1 PAWS Sweetwater Count School District #1 PAWS Disaggregated Math Results Disaggregated Math Results Dissaggregated Math Results Grade Level/Subject Area/ Area/Year
State
SCSD#1
3rd Grade Math ELL 2013-2014 3rd Grade Math ELL 2014-2015 3rd Grade Math ELL 2015-2016 3rd Grade Math IEP 2013-2014 3rd Grade Math IEP 2014-2015 3rd Grade Math IEP 2015-2016 With Accommodations 2015-2016 WY-ALT 2015-2016 3rd Grade Math FRL 2013-2014 3rd Grade Math FRL 2014-2015 3rd Grade Math FRL 2015-2016
21.0% 16.20% 24.48% 30.56% 27.16% 30.86% 15.03% 56.10% 39.02% 37.17% 40.81%
26.87% 24.49% 22.22% 28.21% 26.51% 37.23%* 20.00% 77.78% 33.33% 33.33% 41.44%*
Grade Level/Subject Area/ Area/Year
State 13.50% 15.38% 13.39% 25.45% 25.80% 28.03% 16.20% 57.14%
7.69% 18.75% 7.14% 20.27% 25.00% 22.50% 14.55% 66.67%
4th Grade Math FRL 2013-2014 4th Grade Math FRL 2014-2015 4th Grade Math FRL 2015-2016
36.48% 40.69% 43.73%
28.79% 28.34% 35.10%
State
State
District
6th Grade Math ELL 2013-2014 6th Grade Math ELL 2014-2015 6th Grade Math ELL 2015-2016 6th Grade Math IEP 2013-2014 6th Grade Math IEP 2014-2015 6th Grade Math IEP 2015-2016 With Accommodations 2015-2016 WY-ALT 2015-2016 6th Grade Math FRL 2013-2014 6th Grade Math FRL 2014-2015 6th Grade Math FRL 2015-2016
11.43% 10.79% 16.20% 19.59% 20.58% 18.95% 10.08% 58.57% 36.12% 36.16% 35.90%
Decrease
Grade Level/Subject Area/ Area/Year
State
District
7th Grade Math ELL 2013-2014 7th Grade Math ELL 2014-2015 7th Grade Math ELL 2015-2016 7th Grade Math IEP 2013-2014 7th Grade Math IEP 2014-2015 7th Grade Math IEP 2015-2016 With Accommodations 2015-2016 WY-ALT 2015-2016 7th Grade Math FRL 2013-2014 7th Grade Math FRL 2014-2015 7th Grade Math FRL 2015-2016
10.75% 6.94% 13.79% 16.67% 14.30% 17.09% 9.86% 72.31% 31.63% 28.91% 34.01%
Decrease
Grade Level/Subject Area/ Area/Year
State
8th Grade Math ELL 2013-2014 8th Grade Math ELL 2014-2015 8th Grade Math ELL 2015-2016 8th Grade Math IEP 2013-2014 8th Grade Math IEP 2014-2015 8th Grade Math IEP 2015-2016 With Accommodations 2015-2016 WY-ALT 2015-2016 8th Grade Math FRL 2013-2014 8th Grade Math FRL 2014-2015 8th Grade Math FRL 2015-2016
8.43% 13.95% 9.82% 17.72% 15.30% 13.27% 6.36% 68.12% 35.02% 33.17% 34.07%
-2.27%
10.72%
8.11%
13.94% 17.86% 16.39%
8.70% 0.00% 14.29%
5th Grade Math IEP 2013-2014 5th Grade Math IEP 2014-2015 5th Grade Math IEP 2015-2016 With Accommodations 2015-2016 WY-ALT 2015-2016
26.86% 23.35% 26.53% 15.36% 66.22%
7.35% 11.11% 13.33% 1.89% 62.50%
5th Grade Math FRL 2013-2014 5th Grade Math FRL 2014-2015 5th Grade Math FRL 2015-2016
41.59% 39.64% 44.23%
25.99% 33.33% 36.00%
District
SCSD#1 Increase or Decrease
5.88% 4.76% 11.11% 15.28% 13.43% 8.77% 6.06% 50.00% 25.74% 25.99% 27.32%
6.35%
-4.66%
1.33% District
SCSD#1 Increase or Decrease
-11.61%
-2.50%
6.76%
SCSD#1 Increase or
5th Grade Math ELL 2013-2014 5th Grade Math ELL 2014-2015 5th Grade Math ELL 2015-2016
Dissaggregated Math Results
Grade Level/Subject Area/ Area/Year
SCSD#1 Increase or
4th Grade Math ELL 2013-2014 4th Grade Math ELL 2014-2015 4th Grade Math ELL 2015-2016 4th Grade Math IEP 2013-2014 4th Grade Math IEP 2014-2015 4th Grade Math IEP 2015-2016 With Accommodations 2015-2016 WY-ALT 2015-2016
Grade Level/Subject Area/ Area/Year
District Increase or Decrease
5.88% 0.00% 8.70% 7.69% 16.36% 9.68% 0.00% 50.00% 24.36% 28.09% 30.54%
8.70%
-6.68%
2.45% District
SCSD#1 Increase or Decrease
14.29%
2.22%
2.67%
* indicates performance higher than the state average.
* indicates performance higher than the state average.
Agenda item 8-b page 9
12.50% 12.50% 15.38%* 12.77% 15.91% 20.00%* 2.78% 100.00% 36.59% 30.07% 33.14%
2.88%
4.09%
3.07%
District Math Comparison Sweetwater County School District #1 District PAWS Math Comparison
Sweetwater County School District #1 District PAWS Math Comparison
Rank
District
Grade
School Year
Subject
1
Uinta #1
03
15-16
Math
Proficient and Advanced 66.20%
2
Albany #1
03
15-16
Math
57.45%
3
Sweetwater #2
03
15-16
Math
57.01%
4
Natrona #1
03
15-16
Math
5
Sweetwater #1
03
15-16
6
Lincoln #2
03
15-16
Rank
District
1
Lincoln #2
06
15-16
Math
Proficient and Advanced 67.63%
54.35%
2 3 4
Albany #1 Laramie #1 Campbell #1
06 06 06
15-16 15-16 15-16
Math Math Math
62.75% 54.69% 52.93%
Math
52.57%
5
Sweetwater #2
06
15-16
Math
51.43%
Math
51.43%
6
Uinta #1
06
15-16
Math
47.32%
Grade
School Year
Subject
7
Laramie #1
03
15-16
Math
46.24%
8
Campbell #1
03
15-16
Math
44.17%
7 8
Carbon #1 Sweetwater #1
06 06
15-16 15-16
Math Math
45.11% 39.47%
9
Carbon #1
03
15-16
Math
38.36%
9
Natrona #1
06
15-16
Math
36.64%
1
Albany #1
04
15-16
Math
63.69%
1
Albany #1
07
15-16
Math
61.29%
2
Lincoln #2
04
15-16
Math
63.37%
2
Campbell #1
07
15-16
Math
52.86%
Lincoln #2
07
15-16
Math
52.78%
Sweetwater #2
04
15-16
Math
61.58%
3
4
Uinta #1
04
15-16
Math
58.80%
4
Uinta #1
07
15-16
Math
50.65%
5
Natrona #1
04
15-16
Math
55.06%
5
Sweetwater #2
07
15-16
Math
47.62%
6
Campbell #1
04
15-16
Math
52.20%
6
Carbon #1
07
15-16
Math
47.15%
7
Sweetwater #1
04
15-16
Math
47.24%
7
Sweetwater #1
07
15-16
Math
45.98%
8
Laramie #1
04
15-16
Math
46.42%
8
Laramie #1
07
15-16
Math
43.54%
9
Carbon #1
04
15-16
Math
38.41%
9
Natrona #1
07
15-16
Math
42.22%
1
Lincoln #2
05
15-16
Math
69.30%
1
Lincoln #2
08
15-16
Math
62.19%
2
Uinta #1
05
15-16
Math
66.67%
3
Albany #1
05
15-16
Math
61.54%
2
Uinta #1
08
15-16
Math
51.05%
4
Sweetwater #2
05
15-16
Math
59.52%
3
Albany #1
08
15-16
Math
48.42%
5
Natrona #1
05
15-16
Math
55.13%
6
Laramie #1
05
15-16
Math
48.11%
7
Sweetwater #1
05
15-16
Math
47.29%
8
Campbell #1
05
15-16
Math
47.09%
9
Carbon #1
05
15-16
Math
45.32%
3
4
Campbell #1
08
15-16
Math
45.73%
5
Sweetwater #1
08
15-16
Math
44.84%
6
Sweetwater #2
08
15-16
Math
42.11%
7
Laramie #1
08
15-16
Math
42.10%
8
Natrona #1
08
15-16
Math
41.26%
9
Carbon #1
08
15-16
Math
37.78%
Agenda item 8-b page 10
Math Results Next Steps
Celebrations • • • • • •
Third grade math performance increased by 7.19%. Fifth grade math performance increased by 6.26%. Five (3rd, 4th, 5th, 7th,8th grades) of the six grade levels tested saw an increase from last year. Fifth and eighth grades saw increases in student performance in ELL, IEP and FRL categories. Many schools are performing higher than overall state averages. Summer academies funded through school improvement grant funds supports continued implementation.
•
•
•
• •
All math teachers will be trained to use the newly adopted math resources. Continue using professional development time to collaboratively design and revise quality lesson plans. The district math team will design common district assessments and help with implementation. Continue teacher support with instructional coaches. Continue instructional teacher leader support
Agenda item 8-b page 11
only t o n o t itment , but to go m m o c h hig ards n d e n e a s t s e v ed on h ’ s t i a w B “We . e m l u b l possi rricu align cu beyond where school districts d m above an s we’ve seen fro and take t the effor rom each other f support, it’s f to learn e of the system o e Airst in g advanta hat our kids com t Balow obvious .” n a i l l i J g tion c u Wyomin r t s n I c of Publi
dent n e t n i r e Sup
State
“Staff and students worked hard to implement math standards and pilot the new math curriculum.”
Kris Cundall Principal at Walnut Elementary
What’s Working provides “The new math curriculum consistency for teachers and ing more students. Teachers are feel conAident.”
Ryan Allen entary Principal of Overland Elem
"We are rea lly excited w it the Eureka Math mate h the adoption of rials to sup implementa port tio Careful alig n of the District Math m nment of in struction an ap. frequent da d ta analysis i n our PLCs a us to meet t llowed he needs of o u r recognize e students an xcellent gai d ns in math achievemen t fo We are look r our fourth grade stu d ing forward to even mo ents. progress as re we move in to the new y across grad ear e levels.” Barbara Re Principal a zzonico t Desert Vie w Elementa ry
Agenda item 8-b page 12
Sweetwater County School District #1 PAWS Reading Results
Agenda item 8-b page 13
Sweetwater County School District #1 PAWS Reading Results Sweetwater Count School District #1 PAWS Reading Results July 14, 2016 Grade Level/Subject Area 3rd Grade Reading 2013-2014 3rd Grade Reading 2014-2015 3rd Grade Reading 2015-2016 4th Grade Reading 2013-2014 4th Grade Reading 2014-2015 4th Grade Reading 2015-2016 5th Grade Reading 2013-2014 5th Grade Reading 2014-2015 5th Grade Reading 2015-2016 6th Grade Reading 2013-2014 6th Grade Reading 2014-2015 6th Grade Reading 2015-2016 7th Grade Reading 2013-2014 7th Grade Reading 2014-2015 7th Grade Reading 2015-2016 8th Grade Reading 2013-2014 8th Grade Reading 2014-2015 8th Grade Reading 2015-2016
State 61.94% 60.65% 58.05% State 63.90% 60.45% 65.44%
SCSD#1 58.17% 55.71% 51.34% SCSD#1 61.31% 61.34% 63.52%
District Increase or Decrease
DES 50%
DV 56.25% 43.21% 45.65%
FEES 75% 70.00% 76.92%*
LIN 45.45% 52.63% 70.97%*
NP 65% 59.70% 50.00%
OV 57.97% 56.06% 53.57%
SA 57.83% 60.47% 57.81%
DV 52.86% 47.62% 50.85%
FEES 84.62% 62.50% 83.33%*
LIN
NP 52.73% 66.67% 57.69%
OV 43.14% 63.51% 67.35%*
SA 61.80% 53.41% 67.21%*
FEES 90% 84.62% 50.00%
ES
PB
47.28% 53.81% 55.41%
44.72% 47.67% 52.70%
DES 25%
FEMS 85.71% 83.33% 56.25%
ES 49.53% 52.65% 56.38%
PB 56.62% 49.26% 60.29%*
DMS 60.00% 28.57% 57.14%
FEMS 47.37% 77.78% 62.50%*
RSJH 60.27% 59.95% 64.01%*
DMS 71.43%
FEMS 85.71% 66.67% 69.23%*
RSJH 64.86% 52.99% 58.23%*
-4.37% District Increase or Decrease
DES 50% 50%
2.18% District Increase or Decrease
State
SCSD#1
58.36% 58.58% 61.07%
47.23% 52.22% 53.91%
1.69%
State
SCSD#1
District Increase or Decrease
57.23% 56.7% 57.89%
53.14% 52.02% 58.5%*
6.48%
State
SCSD#1
District Increase or Decrease
59.23% 56.70% 60.08%
59.65% 59.81% 63.97%*
4.16%
State
SCSD#1
District Increase or Decrease
58.06% 51.57% 53.67%
65.34% 54.22% 58.55%*
4.33%
DES
50.00%
* indicates performance higher than the state average.
Agenda item 8-b page 14
80.95% 60.87%
SC
37.11% SC
59.21%
WA 55.74% 54.55% 58.49%*
WR 59.30% 57.50% 47.46%
WA 66.13% 59.42% 85.71%*
WR 75.86% 72.50% 64.52%
At-Risk Student Reading Results
Sweetwater County School District #1 PAWS Sweetwater County School District #1 PAWS Sweetwater Count School District #1 PAWS Sweetwater Count School District #1 PAWS Disaggregated Reading Results Disaggregated Reading Results Dissaggregated Reading Results Dissaggregated Reading Results Grade Level/Subject Area/ Area/Year
State
SCSD#1
3rd Grade Reading ELL 2013-2014 3rd Grade Reading ELL 2014-2015 3rd Grade Reading ELL 2015-2016 3rd Grade Reading IEP 2013-2014 3rd Grade Reading IEP 2014-2015 3rd Grade Reading IEP 2015-2016 With Accommodations 2015-2016 WY-ALT 2015-2016 3rd Grade Reading FRL 2013-2014 3rd Grade Reading FRL 2014-2015 3rd Grade Reading FRL 2015-2016
29.44% 20.11% 20.43% 32.43% 31.16% 29.73% 10.38% 71.95% 50.10% 47.29% 44.37%
32.84% 26.53% 19.23% 32.05% 27.71% 31.58%* 12.07% 70.00% 48.44% 43.60% 39.55%
Grade Level/Subject Area/ Area/Year
State
SCSD#1
4th Grade Reading ELL 2013-2014 4th Grade Reading ELL 2014-2015 4th Grade Reading ELL 2015-2016 4th Grade Reading IEP 2013-2014 4th Grade Reading IEP 2014-2015 4th Grade Reading IEP 2015-2016 With Accommodations 2015-2016 WY-ALT 2015-2016
20.70% 13.72% 17.05% 29.98% 28.51% 31.04% 17.42% 74.60%
23.08% 9.68% 18.52%* 21.62% 32.14% 31.25%* 25.86% 83.33%
4th Grade Reading FRL 2013-2014 4th Grade Reading FRL 2014-2015 4th Grade Reading FRL 2015-2016
51.59% 46.76% 53.41%
51.76% 46.77% 50.72%
Grade Level/Subject Area/ Area/Year
State
SCSD#1
5th Grade Reading ELL 2013-2014 5th Grade Reading ELL 2014-2015 5th Grade Reading ELL 2015-2016
12.66% 9.62% 10.86%
0.00% 0.00% 22.22%*
5th Grade Reading IEP 2013-2014 5th Grade Reading IEP 2014-2015 5th Grade Reading IEP 2015-2016 With Accommodations 2015-2016 WY-ALT 2015-2016
26.50% 22.98% 26.25% 13.56% 83.78%
13.24% 14.29% 24.00% 6.00% 87.50%
5th Grade Reading FRL 2013-2014 5th Grade Reading FRL 2014-2015 5th Grade Reading FRL 2015-2016
43.94% 44.39% 47.90%
31.07% 42.16% 41.71%
District Increase or Decrease
Grade Level/Subject Area/ Area/Year
State
6th Grade Reading ELL 2013-2014 6th Grade Reading ELL 2014-2015 6th Grade Reading ELL 2015-2016 6th Grade Reading IEP 2013-2014 6th Grade Reading IEP 2014-2015 6th Grade Reading IEP 2015-2016 With Accommodations 2015-2016 WY-ALT 2015-2016 6th Grade Reading FRL 2013-2014 6th Grade Reading FRL 2014-2015 6th Grade Reading FRL 2015-2016
12.88% 13.39% 9.42% 22.18% 21.90% 19.65% 8.47% 70.00% 43.65% 43.50% 44.69%
Grade Level/Subject Area/ Area/Year
State
7th Grade Reading ELL 2013-2014 7th Grade Reading ELL 2014-2015 7th Grade Reading ELL 2015-2016 7th Grade Reading IEP 2013-2014 7th Grade Reading IEP 2014-2015 7th Grade Reading IEP 2015-2016 With Accommodations 2015-2016 WY-ALT 2015-2016 7th Grade Reading FRL 2013-2014 7th Grade Reading FRL 2014-2015 7th Grade Reading FRL 2015-2016
9.20% 8.33% 14.39% 22.66% 19.42% 20.67% 13.41% 75.38% 46.21% 42.22% 44.22%
Grade Level/Subject Area/ Area/Year
State
8th Grade Reading ELL 2013-2014 8th Grade Reading ELL 2014-2015 8th Grade Reading ELL 2015-2016 8th Grade Reading IEP 2013-2014 8th Grade Reading IEP 2014-2015 8th Grade Reading IEP 2015-2016 With Accommodations 2015-2016 WY-ALT 2015-2016 8th Grade Reading FRL 2013-2014 8th Grade Reading FRL 2014-2015 8th Grade Reading FRL 2015-2016
11.18% 10.00% 11.26% 20.75% 18.34% 16.61% 9.95% 73.91% 42.45% 37.44% 40.35%
District
SCSD#1 Increase or Decrease
-7.30%
3.87%
-4.05% District Increase or Decrease
6.25% 5.56% 0.00% 20.83% 19.40% 26.32%* 6.06% 100.00% 43.28% 37.93% 48.9%*
-5.56%
6.92%
10.97% District
SCSD#1 Increase or Decrease
8.84%
-0.89%
3.95% District Increase or Decrease
7.14% 0.00% 5.00% 17.31% 21.82% 16.13% 10.42% 50.00% 46.10% 47.19% 44.24%*
5.00%
-5.69%
-2.95% District
SCSD#1 Increase or Decrease
22.22%
9.71%
-0.45%
* indicates performance higher than the state average for the spring 2016 state assessment.
20.00% 14.29% 9.09% 25.53% 15.91% 24.00%* 5.56% 100.00% 49.08% 41.84% 45.98%*
-5.20%
8.09%
4.14%
*Indicates performance higher than the state average for the spring 2016 state assessment. * indicates performance higher than the state average for the spring 2016 state assessment.
Agenda item 8-b page 15
District Reading Comparison Sweetwater County School District #1 District PAWS Reading Comparison
Sweetwater County School District #1 District PAWS Reading Comparison
Rank
District
Grade
School Year
Subject
Proficient and Advanced
1 2 3
Lincoln #2 Uinta #1 Albany #1
03 03 03
15-16 15-16 15-16
Reading Reading Reading
4 5 6
Natrona #1 Sweetwater #2 Campbell #1
03 03 03
15-16 15-16 15-16
7 8 9
Laramie #1 Sweetwater #1 Carbon #1
03 03 03
1 2
Albany #1 Lincoln #2
3
Rank
District
Grade
School Year
Subject
Proficient and Advanced
63.27% 62.50% 62.19%
1
Albany #1
06
15-16
Reading
71.14%
2
Lincoln #2
06
15-16
Reading
71.01%
3
Laramie #1
06
15-16
Reading
61.37%
Reading Reading Reading
59.46% 57.01% 53.27%
4 5
Sweetwater #1 Campbell #1
06 06
15-16 15-16
Reading Reading
58.50% 56.63%
6
Sweetwater #2
06
15-16
Reading
56.00%
15-16 15-16 15-16
Reading Reading Reading
52.42% 51.34% 40.13%
7 8
Natrona #1 Uinta #1
06 06
15-16 15-16
Reading Reading
55.05% 52.91%
9
Carbon #1
06
15-16
Reading
45.45%
04 04
15-16 15-16
Reading Reading
73.73% 69.31%
1 2
Lincoln #2 Albany #1
07 07
15-16 15-16
Reading Reading
72.22% 70.86%
Sweetwater #2
04
15-16
Reading
68.95%
3
Sweetwater #1
07
15-16
Reading
63.97%
4 5 6 7
Natrona #1 Campbell #1 Sweetwater #1 Laramie #1
04 04 04 04
15-16 15-16 15-16 15-16
Reading Reading Reading Reading
64.47% 63.58% 63.52% 62.68%
4
Sweetwater #2
07
15-16
Reading
59.52%
5 6
Uinta #1 Campbell #1
07 07
15-16 15-16
Reading Reading
58.70% 58.45%
8 9
Uinta #1 Carbon #1
04 04
15-16 15-16
Reading Reading
62.50% 50.99%
7
Natrona #1
07
15-16
Reading
56.08%
8 9
Carbon #1 Laramie #1
07 07
15-16 15-16
Reading Reading
52.03% 51.28%
1 2
Lincoln #2 Albany #1
05 05
15-16 15-16
Reading Reading
72.22% 66.56%
1
Lincoln #2
08
15-16
Reading
68.16%
3
Uinta #1
05
15-16
Reading
62.04%
4
Natrona #1
05
15-16
Reading
61.55%
2 3
Sweetwater #1 Albany #1
08 08
15-16 15-16
Reading Reading
58.55% 57.19%
5 6 7 8 9
Laramie #1 Sweetwater #2 Campbell #1 Sweetwater #1 Carbon #1
05 05 05 05 05
15-16 15-16 15-16 15-16 15-16
Reading Reading Reading Reading Reading
60.98% 59.52% 57.45% 53.91% 48.92%
4
Laramie #1
08
15-16
Reading
51.63%
5 6
Natrona #1 Uinta #1
08 08
15-16 15-16
Reading Reading
50.75% 50.00%
7
Sweetwater #2
08
15-16
Reading
49.04%
8
Campbell #1
08
15-16
Reading
47.90%
9
Carbon #1
08
15-16
Reading
38.81%
Agenda item 8-b page 16
SCSD#1 Reading Results Celebrations
Next Steps
• The district had two grade levels (4th and 5th) performing above the state average in ELL. • The district had four grade levels (3rd, 4th, 6th and 8th) performing above the state average in the IEP category. • Sixth grade reading performance increased by 6.48%. • Seventh and eighth grade reading performance increased by more than 4%. • Five (4th, 5th ,6th ,7th ,8th grades) of the six grade levels tested saw an increase over last year. • Many schools are performing higher than overall state averages.
• Begin initial implementation of SCSD#1draft English Language Arts (ELA) Curriculum Map. • Continue district common assessments. • Begin looking for researchproven ELA resources. • Continue using professional development time to collaboratively design quality lesson plans. • Continue instructional coach support. • Continue instructional teacher leader support
Agenda item 8-b page 17
What’s Working “Overland Elementary has had training in PLC’s at work and data teams. This year we focused on being a strong data driven professional learning community (PLC). All PLC teams had consistent principal and instructional coach support.”
ing ams n r a e L te effective al a n t o i a s d s e e rof tilized th s, discuss goals, P r u o t g n u “Withi unities, we e assessmenmon learnin Commss to analyzies, set com g.“ ison proce ing strateg lar learnin r r a G on teach onitor scho Shann ementary El and m t Butte nator
Ryan Allen Principal at Overland Elementary
“Having consistency in testing, curriculum and education standards over the last couple of years is one key to improved scores.” Jillian Balow State Superintendent of Public Instruction Agenda item 8-b page 18
at Pilo le III Coordi l a p i c t Prin nts/Ti a r G l Federa
Sweetwater County School District #1 PAWS Science Results
Agenda item 8-b page 19
Sweetwater County School District #1 PAWS Science Results Sweetwater Count School District #1 PAWS Science Results July 14, 2016 Grade Level/Subject Area 4th Grade Science 2013-2014 4th Grade Science 2014-2015 4th Grade Science 2015-2016 8th Grade Science 2013-2014 8th Grade Science 2014-2015 8th Grade Science 2015-2016
State 52.87% 51.34% 54.47% State 47.08% 41.61% 41.57%
SCSD#1 52.21% 49.24% 52.25% SCSD#1 50.25% 43.26% 39.37%
District Increase or Decrease
DES 33%
3.01% District Increase or Decrease
-3.89%
DMS 28.57% 28.75%
DV 41.43% 44.44% 45.76%
FEES 84.62% 50.00% 75.00%*
FEMS 85.71% 55.56% 38.46%
RSJH 50.00% 42.70% 39.59%
LIN 42.86% 47.83%
NP 50.91% 53.70% 46.75%
OV 31.37% 47.89% 63.27%*
SA 44.94% 43.82% 50.00%
SC
51.32%
WA 67.74% 53.62% 78.57%*
WR 64.37% 56.25% 41.94%
on d e t a r t concen g s r e h c n a “Our te onal text duri ti informa ading time.” all d n u C e r s i Kr student tary n e m e l E alnut W t a l a Princip
* indicates performance higher than the state average.
Agenda item 8-b page 20
At-Risk Student Science Results
Sweetwater County School District #1 PAWS Sweetwater Count School District #1 PAWS Disaggregated Science Results Dissaggregated Science Results Grade Level/Subject Area/ Area/Year
State
District
SCSD#1 Increase or Decrease
4th Grade Science ELL 2013-2014 4th Grade Science ELL 2014-2015 4th Grade Science ELL 2015-2016 4th Grade Science IEP 2013-2014 4th Grade Science IEP 2014-2015 4th Grade Science IEP 2015-2016 With Accommodations 2015-2016 WY-ALT 2015-2016 4th Grade Science FRL 2013-2014 4th Grade Science FRL 2014-2015 4th Grade Science FRL 2015-2016
11.76% 10.73% 8.97% 33.00% 30.53% 29.69% 20.33% 50.59% 40.47% 38.14% 41.45%
Grade Level/Subject Area/ Area/Year
State
8th Grade Science ELL 2013-2014 8th Grade Science ELL 2014-2015 8th Grade Science ELL 2015-2016 8th Grade Science IEP 2013-2014 8th Grade Science IEP 2014-2015 8th Grade Science IEP 2015-2016 With Accommodations 2015-2016 WY-ALT 2015-2016 8th Grade Science FRL 2013-2014 8th Grade Science FRL 2014-2015 8th Grade Science FRL 2015-2016
4.82% 4.12% 4.29% 20.69% 15.25% 12.89% 6.66% 67.65% 31.75% 29.24% 27.33%
11.54% 9.38% 17.86%* 35.14% 36.14% 30.00%* 25.00% 66.67% 39.70% 36.96% 37.50%
8.48%
-6.14%
0.54% District
SCSD#1 Increase or Decrease
6.25% 12.50% 7.69%* 23.40% 13.64% 20.00%* 5.26% 100.00% 32.32% 31.47% 26.44%
-4.81%
6.36%
-5.03%
Agenda item 8-b page 21
District Science Comparison Sweetwater County School District #1 District PAWS Science Comparison Grade
School Year
Sweetwater #2 Albany #1
04 04
15-16 15-16
Science Science
Proficient and Advanced 64.74% 62.99%
Lincoln #2
04
15-16
Science
62.69%
4 5
Campbell #1 Natrona #1
04 04
15-16 15-16
Science Science
55.28% 55.10%
6 7
Sweetwater #1
04
15-16
Science
52.25%
Uinta #1 Laramie #1
04 04
15-16 15-16
Science Science
51.85% 49.49%
Carbon #1
04
15-16
Science
34.67%
Lincoln #2
08
15-16
Science
61.69%
Albany #1 Uinta #1
08 08
15-16 15-16
Science Science
43.51% 42.33%
Natrona #1 Sweetwater #1 Campbell #1 Laramie #1
08 08 08 08
15-16 15-16 15-16 15-16
Science Science Science Science
40.38% 39.37% 38.89% 35.04%
Sweetwater #2
08
15-16
Science
31.10%
Carbon #1
08
15-16
Science
24.44%
Rank 1 2 3
8 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
District
Agenda item 8-b page 22
Subject
Science Results Celebrations • Fourth grade science performance increased by 3.01%. • Fourth grade ELL students increased their performance by over 8%. • Six schools saw an increase over last year in science performance by the fourth grade students. • Many schools are performing higher than average state levels.
• •
• •
Next Steps State Science Standards Adoption Curriculum map the newly adopted science standards during the 2017/2018 school year. Continue instructional coaching support. Continue instructional teacher leader support.
Agenda item 8-b page 23
PAWS Results
“We can also see in these results that there is work to be done to close achievement gaps for English language learners, students with disabilities, students on free/ reduced price lunch, and homeless students. Implementation of the Every Student Succeeds Act gives us a really good opportunity to ensure the right resources are getting to those who need them, so that we can create opportunities for every student to keep Wyoming strong.” Jillian Balow
State Superintendent of Public Instruction
Agenda item 8-b page 24
WDE Assessment Update • Wyoming Task Force evaluated our current assessment system • Recommendations include: – Reduced Testing Time – Emphasis on classroom, school and district assessments – Meaningful and timely reporting
• The state test may change next year. – Request for proposals (RFP) for the new state test will go out in September.
Agenda item 8-b page 25
Vision Statement
Mission Statement To provide a quality education for all students.
As an innovative district, united with our community, we empower and inspire all students to academic excellence in pursuit of their interests and passions.
Academic Visioning Curriculum Mapping • Instructional Teacher Leaders • Instructional Coaches • Lesson planning and quality Instruction • Professional Development
Systematic process • Math • PE & Health • ELA (draft) • Info Lit (draft) • Foreign Language (draft)
Assessment System • District Common Assessments • District Assessment Plan
Communication • Stakeholder Involvement • Community Curriculum Council (CCC) • Parent/Teacher Survey Data
Vision Statement: As an innovative district, united with our community, we empower and inspire all students to academic excellence in pursuit of their interests and passions. Agenda item 8-b page 26
AdvancED Improvement Priority Establish a systemic process, guided by the purpose and direction of the district, that will ensure horizontal and vertical alignment of curriculum, assessment, and instruction.
“These positive strides are the result of some great work from our schools, teachers, parents, and students.” Jillian Balow State Superintendent of Public Instruction
f o l l a t a th s t r o f f e d t r n o e p m p u m s o “I c our d n a s r .” r e a h e c y a e t t s our s pa i h t e n o d rn e e v v o a G h c f staf elly M K t n e d n e t n uperi S 1 # D S C
S
Agenda item 8-b page 27
Agenda item 8-b page 1
Vision Statement: As an innovative district, united with our community, we empower and inspire all students to academic excellence in pursuit of their interests and passions. Mission Statement: To provide a quality education for all students. We will accomplish this by: • Making students our first priority. • Utilizing community partnerships. • Promoting professional excellence. • Being a board committed to excellence in education. • Providing a safe, orderly and efficient environment.
Agenda item 8-b page 2
Purpose • Evaluate SCSD#1 PAWS assessment data • Review SCSD#1 celebrations and next steps • Review upcoming revisions to the statewide assessment system
Agenda item 8-b page 3
What is PAWS (Pro>iciency Assessments for Wyoming Students)? • Wyoming state assessment • Multiple choice questions • Students in grades 3-8 take reading and math tests • Students in 4th and 8th grades also take a science test • Administered during March • Used to foster program improvement at the school, district and state level • Meets the federal accountability law
Agenda item 8-b page 4
Vision Statement
Mission Statement To provide a quality education for all students.
As an innovative district, united with our community, we empower and inspire all students to academic excellence in pursuit of their interests and passions.
Academic Visioning Curriculum Mapping • Instructional Teacher Leaders • Instructional Coaches • Lesson planning and quality Instruction • Professional Development
Systematic process • Math • PE & Health • ELA (draft) • Info Lit (draft) • Foreign Language (draft)
Assessment System • District Common Assessments • District Assessment Plan
Communication • Stakeholder Involvement • Community Curriculum Council (CCC) • Parent/Teacher Survey Data
Vision Statement: As an innovative district, united with our community, we empower and inspire all students to academic excellence in pursuit of their interests and passions. Agenda item 8-b page 5
AdvancED Improvement Priority Establish a systemic process, guided by the purpose and direction of the district, that will ensure horizontal and vertical alignment of curriculum, assessment, and instruction.
District Improvement Achievement Goal All students will be pro>icient or advanced in reading, math and science as determined by state assessment results. Milestones Results SCSD#1 will see a 5% increase in pro>iciency in Math, Reading and Science in all grade levels during the 2015/2016 School year.
District goal was met in: 3rd grade math 4th grade math 5th grade math 7th grade math 6th grade reading
Agenda item 8-b page 6
Sweetwater County School District #1 PAWS Math Results
Agenda item 8-b page 7
Sweetwater County School District #1 PAWS Math Results Sweetwater Count School District #1 PAWS Math Results July 14, 2016 Grade Level/Subject Area 3rd Grade Math 2013-2014 3rd Grade Math 2014-2015 3rd Grade Math 2015-2016 4th Grade Math 2013-2014 4th Grade Math 2014-2015 4th Grade Math 2015-2016 5th Grade Math 2013-2014 5th Grade Math 2014-2015 5th Grade Math 2015-2016 6th Grade Math 2013-2014 6th Grade Math 2014-2015 6th Grade Math 2015-2016
State 50.8% 49.48% 52.94%
SCSD#1 43.01% 45.38% 52.57%
State 47.02% 50.58% 55.18%
SCSD#1 37.62% 41.59% 47.24%
State
SCSD#1
54.3% 52.64% 56.31%
40% 41.03% 47.29%
State 48.94% 49.47% 49.79%
SCSD#1 36.24% 39.64% 39.47%
7th Grade Math 2013-2014
State 43.37%
SCSD#1 36.82%
7th Grade Math 2014-2015 7th Grade Math 2015-2016
43.39% 49.38%
41.12% 45.98%
8th Grade Math 2013-2014
State 49.70%
SCSD#1 52.99%
8th Grade Math 2014-2015 8th Grade Math 2015-2016
47.44% 47.88%
44.53% 44.84%
District Increase or Decrease
DES 33.33%
DV 42.19% 40.74% 39.13%
FEES 62.50% 80.00% 50.00%
LIN 9.09% 50.00% 68.75%*
NP 56.67% 49.25% 53.13%*
OV 42.03% 45.45% 66.67%*
SA 43.37% 41.18% 65.63%*
SC 36.46%
WA 34.43% 37.88% 69.81%*
WR 48.24% 50.00% 35.59%
DES
DV 20.29% 25.40% 61.02%*
FEES 69.23% 75.00% 66.67%*
LIN 57.14% 41.30%
NP 30.91% 55.56% 29.49%
OV 17.65% 27.03% 42.86%
SA 29.21% 35.96% 50.00%
SC 39.47%
WA 40.32% 42.03% 76.19%*
WR 67.82% 57.50% 50.00%
FEES 90.00% 90.00% 90.00%*
ES 36.55% 34.85% 50.00%
PB 41.71% 42.49% 43.05%
DES 62.50%
FEMS 71.43% 83.33% 50.00%*
ES 25.82% 34.36% 32.80%
PB 44.29% 42.44% 43.63%
DMS 40.00%
FEMS 36.84%
RSJH 36.77%
20.00%
44.44% 56.25%*
41.50% 45.43%
DMS 57.14%
FEMS 71.43%
RSJH 52.58%
42.86%
44.44% 46.15%
44.32% 44.84%
7.19% District Increase or Decrease
33.33% 5.65% District Increase or Decrease
DES
6.26%
33.33%
District Increase or Decrease
-0.17% District Increase or Decrease
4.86% District Increase or Decrease
0.31%
* indicates performance higher than the state average.
Vision Statement: As an innovative district, united with our community, we empower and inspire all students to academic excellence in pursuit of their interests and passions. Agenda item 8-b page 8
At-Risk Student Math Results Sweetwater County School District #1 PAWS Sweetwater County School District #1 PAWS Sweetwater Count School District #1 PAWS Sweetwater Count School District #1 PAWS Disaggregated Math Results Disaggregated Math Results Dissaggregated Math Results Grade Level/Subject Area/ Area/Year
State
SCSD#1
3rd Grade Math ELL 2013-2014 3rd Grade Math ELL 2014-2015 3rd Grade Math ELL 2015-2016 3rd Grade Math IEP 2013-2014 3rd Grade Math IEP 2014-2015 3rd Grade Math IEP 2015-2016 With Accommodations 2015-2016 WY-ALT 2015-2016 3rd Grade Math FRL 2013-2014 3rd Grade Math FRL 2014-2015 3rd Grade Math FRL 2015-2016
21.0% 16.20% 24.48% 30.56% 27.16% 30.86% 15.03% 56.10% 39.02% 37.17% 40.81%
26.87% 24.49% 22.22% 28.21% 26.51% 37.23%* 20.00% 77.78% 33.33% 33.33% 41.44%*
Grade Level/Subject Area/ Area/Year
State 13.50% 15.38% 13.39% 25.45% 25.80% 28.03% 16.20% 57.14%
7.69% 18.75% 7.14% 20.27% 25.00% 22.50% 14.55% 66.67%
4th Grade Math FRL 2013-2014 4th Grade Math FRL 2014-2015 4th Grade Math FRL 2015-2016
36.48% 40.69% 43.73%
28.79% 28.34% 35.10%
State
State
District
6th Grade Math ELL 2013-2014 6th Grade Math ELL 2014-2015 6th Grade Math ELL 2015-2016 6th Grade Math IEP 2013-2014 6th Grade Math IEP 2014-2015 6th Grade Math IEP 2015-2016 With Accommodations 2015-2016 WY-ALT 2015-2016 6th Grade Math FRL 2013-2014 6th Grade Math FRL 2014-2015 6th Grade Math FRL 2015-2016
11.43% 10.79% 16.20% 19.59% 20.58% 18.95% 10.08% 58.57% 36.12% 36.16% 35.90%
Decrease
Grade Level/Subject Area/ Area/Year
State
District
7th Grade Math ELL 2013-2014 7th Grade Math ELL 2014-2015 7th Grade Math ELL 2015-2016 7th Grade Math IEP 2013-2014 7th Grade Math IEP 2014-2015 7th Grade Math IEP 2015-2016 With Accommodations 2015-2016 WY-ALT 2015-2016 7th Grade Math FRL 2013-2014 7th Grade Math FRL 2014-2015 7th Grade Math FRL 2015-2016
10.75% 6.94% 13.79% 16.67% 14.30% 17.09% 9.86% 72.31% 31.63% 28.91% 34.01%
Decrease
Grade Level/Subject Area/ Area/Year
State
8th Grade Math ELL 2013-2014 8th Grade Math ELL 2014-2015 8th Grade Math ELL 2015-2016 8th Grade Math IEP 2013-2014 8th Grade Math IEP 2014-2015 8th Grade Math IEP 2015-2016 With Accommodations 2015-2016 WY-ALT 2015-2016 8th Grade Math FRL 2013-2014 8th Grade Math FRL 2014-2015 8th Grade Math FRL 2015-2016
8.43% 13.95% 9.82% 17.72% 15.30% 13.27% 6.36% 68.12% 35.02% 33.17% 34.07%
-2.27%
10.72%
8.11%
13.94% 17.86% 16.39%
8.70% 0.00% 14.29%
5th Grade Math IEP 2013-2014 5th Grade Math IEP 2014-2015 5th Grade Math IEP 2015-2016 With Accommodations 2015-2016 WY-ALT 2015-2016
26.86% 23.35% 26.53% 15.36% 66.22%
7.35% 11.11% 13.33% 1.89% 62.50%
5th Grade Math FRL 2013-2014 5th Grade Math FRL 2014-2015 5th Grade Math FRL 2015-2016
41.59% 39.64% 44.23%
25.99% 33.33% 36.00%
District
SCSD#1 Increase or Decrease
5.88% 4.76% 11.11% 15.28% 13.43% 8.77% 6.06% 50.00% 25.74% 25.99% 27.32%
6.35%
-4.66%
1.33% District
SCSD#1 Increase or Decrease
-11.61%
-2.50%
6.76%
SCSD#1 Increase or
5th Grade Math ELL 2013-2014 5th Grade Math ELL 2014-2015 5th Grade Math ELL 2015-2016
Dissaggregated Math Results
Grade Level/Subject Area/ Area/Year
SCSD#1 Increase or
4th Grade Math ELL 2013-2014 4th Grade Math ELL 2014-2015 4th Grade Math ELL 2015-2016 4th Grade Math IEP 2013-2014 4th Grade Math IEP 2014-2015 4th Grade Math IEP 2015-2016 With Accommodations 2015-2016 WY-ALT 2015-2016
Grade Level/Subject Area/ Area/Year
District Increase or Decrease
5.88% 0.00% 8.70% 7.69% 16.36% 9.68% 0.00% 50.00% 24.36% 28.09% 30.54%
8.70%
-6.68%
2.45% District
SCSD#1 Increase or Decrease
14.29%
2.22%
2.67%
* indicates performance higher than the state average.
* indicates performance higher than the state average.
Agenda item 8-b page 9
12.50% 12.50% 15.38%* 12.77% 15.91% 20.00%* 2.78% 100.00% 36.59% 30.07% 33.14%
2.88%
4.09%
3.07%
District Math Comparison Sweetwater County School District #1 District PAWS Math Comparison
Sweetwater County School District #1 District PAWS Math Comparison
Rank
District
Grade
School Year
Subject
1
Uinta #1
03
15-16
Math
Proficient and Advanced 66.20%
2
Albany #1
03
15-16
Math
57.45%
3
Sweetwater #2
03
15-16
Math
57.01%
4
Natrona #1
03
15-16
Math
5
Sweetwater #1
03
15-16
6
Lincoln #2
03
15-16
Rank
District
1
Lincoln #2
06
15-16
Math
Proficient and Advanced 67.63%
54.35%
2 3 4
Albany #1 Laramie #1 Campbell #1
06 06 06
15-16 15-16 15-16
Math Math Math
62.75% 54.69% 52.93%
Math
52.57%
5
Sweetwater #2
06
15-16
Math
51.43%
Math
51.43%
6
Uinta #1
06
15-16
Math
47.32%
Grade
School Year
Subject
7
Laramie #1
03
15-16
Math
46.24%
8
Campbell #1
03
15-16
Math
44.17%
7 8
Carbon #1 Sweetwater #1
06 06
15-16 15-16
Math Math
45.11% 39.47%
9
Carbon #1
03
15-16
Math
38.36%
9
Natrona #1
06
15-16
Math
36.64%
1
Albany #1
04
15-16
Math
63.69%
1
Albany #1
07
15-16
Math
61.29%
2
Lincoln #2
04
15-16
Math
63.37%
2
Campbell #1
07
15-16
Math
52.86%
Lincoln #2
07
15-16
Math
52.78%
Sweetwater #2
04
15-16
Math
61.58%
3
4
Uinta #1
04
15-16
Math
58.80%
4
Uinta #1
07
15-16
Math
50.65%
5
Natrona #1
04
15-16
Math
55.06%
5
Sweetwater #2
07
15-16
Math
47.62%
6
Campbell #1
04
15-16
Math
52.20%
6
Carbon #1
07
15-16
Math
47.15%
7
Sweetwater #1
04
15-16
Math
47.24%
7
Sweetwater #1
07
15-16
Math
45.98%
8
Laramie #1
04
15-16
Math
46.42%
8
Laramie #1
07
15-16
Math
43.54%
9
Carbon #1
04
15-16
Math
38.41%
9
Natrona #1
07
15-16
Math
42.22%
1
Lincoln #2
05
15-16
Math
69.30%
1
Lincoln #2
08
15-16
Math
62.19%
2
Uinta #1
05
15-16
Math
66.67%
3
Albany #1
05
15-16
Math
61.54%
2
Uinta #1
08
15-16
Math
51.05%
4
Sweetwater #2
05
15-16
Math
59.52%
3
Albany #1
08
15-16
Math
48.42%
5
Natrona #1
05
15-16
Math
55.13%
6
Laramie #1
05
15-16
Math
48.11%
7
Sweetwater #1
05
15-16
Math
47.29%
8
Campbell #1
05
15-16
Math
47.09%
9
Carbon #1
05
15-16
Math
45.32%
3
4
Campbell #1
08
15-16
Math
45.73%
5
Sweetwater #1
08
15-16
Math
44.84%
6
Sweetwater #2
08
15-16
Math
42.11%
7
Laramie #1
08
15-16
Math
42.10%
8
Natrona #1
08
15-16
Math
41.26%
9
Carbon #1
08
15-16
Math
37.78%
Agenda item 8-b page 10
Math Results Next Steps
Celebrations • • • • • •
Third grade math performance increased by 7.19%. Fifth grade math performance increased by 6.26%. Five (3rd, 4th, 5th, 7th,8th grades) of the six grade levels tested saw an increase from last year. Fifth and eighth grades saw increases in student performance in ELL, IEP and FRL categories. Many schools are performing higher than overall state averages. Summer academies funded through school improvement grant funds supports continued implementation.
•
•
•
• •
All math teachers will be trained to use the newly adopted math resources. Continue using professional development time to collaboratively design and revise quality lesson plans. The district math team will design common district assessments and help with implementation. Continue teacher support with instructional coaches. Continue instructional teacher leader support
Agenda item 8-b page 11
only t o n o t itment , but to go m m o c h hig ards n d e n e a s t s e v ed on h ’ s t i a w B “We . e m l u b l possi rricu align cu beyond where school districts d m above an s we’ve seen fro and take t the effor rom each other f support, it’s f to learn e of the system o e Airst in g advanta hat our kids com t Balow obvious .” n a i l l i J g tion c u Wyomin r t s n I c of Publi
dent n e t n i r e Sup
State
“Staff and students worked hard to implement math standards and pilot the new math curriculum.”
Kris Cundall Principal at Walnut Elementary
What’s Working provides “The new math curriculum consistency for teachers and ing more students. Teachers are feel conAident.”
Ryan Allen entary Principal of Overland Elem
"We are rea lly excited w it the Eureka Math mate h the adoption of rials to sup implementa port tio Careful alig n of the District Math m nment of in struction an ap. frequent da d ta analysis i n our PLCs a us to meet t llowed he needs of o u r recognize e students an xcellent gai d ns in math achievemen t fo We are look r our fourth grade stu d ing forward to even mo ents. progress as re we move in to the new y across grad ear e levels.” Barbara Re Principal a zzonico t Desert Vie w Elementa ry
Agenda item 8-b page 12
Sweetwater County School District #1 PAWS Reading Results
Agenda item 8-b page 13
Sweetwater County School District #1 PAWS Reading Results Sweetwater Count School District #1 PAWS Reading Results July 14, 2016 Grade Level/Subject Area 3rd Grade Reading 2013-2014 3rd Grade Reading 2014-2015 3rd Grade Reading 2015-2016 4th Grade Reading 2013-2014 4th Grade Reading 2014-2015 4th Grade Reading 2015-2016 5th Grade Reading 2013-2014 5th Grade Reading 2014-2015 5th Grade Reading 2015-2016 6th Grade Reading 2013-2014 6th Grade Reading 2014-2015 6th Grade Reading 2015-2016 7th Grade Reading 2013-2014 7th Grade Reading 2014-2015 7th Grade Reading 2015-2016 8th Grade Reading 2013-2014 8th Grade Reading 2014-2015 8th Grade Reading 2015-2016
State 61.94% 60.65% 58.05% State 63.90% 60.45% 65.44%
SCSD#1 58.17% 55.71% 51.34% SCSD#1 61.31% 61.34% 63.52%
District Increase or Decrease
DES 50%
DV 56.25% 43.21% 45.65%
FEES 75% 70.00% 76.92%*
LIN 45.45% 52.63% 70.97%*
NP 65% 59.70% 50.00%
OV 57.97% 56.06% 53.57%
SA 57.83% 60.47% 57.81%
DV 52.86% 47.62% 50.85%
FEES 84.62% 62.50% 83.33%*
LIN
NP 52.73% 66.67% 57.69%
OV 43.14% 63.51% 67.35%*
SA 61.80% 53.41% 67.21%*
FEES 90% 84.62% 50.00%
ES
PB
47.28% 53.81% 55.41%
44.72% 47.67% 52.70%
DES 25%
FEMS 85.71% 83.33% 56.25%
ES 49.53% 52.65% 56.38%
PB 56.62% 49.26% 60.29%*
DMS 60.00% 28.57% 57.14%
FEMS 47.37% 77.78% 62.50%*
RSJH 60.27% 59.95% 64.01%*
DMS 71.43%
FEMS 85.71% 66.67% 69.23%*
RSJH 64.86% 52.99% 58.23%*
-4.37% District Increase or Decrease
DES 50% 50%
2.18% District Increase or Decrease
State
SCSD#1
58.36% 58.58% 61.07%
47.23% 52.22% 53.91%
1.69%
State
SCSD#1
District Increase or Decrease
57.23% 56.7% 57.89%
53.14% 52.02% 58.5%*
6.48%
State
SCSD#1
District Increase or Decrease
59.23% 56.70% 60.08%
59.65% 59.81% 63.97%*
4.16%
State
SCSD#1
District Increase or Decrease
58.06% 51.57% 53.67%
65.34% 54.22% 58.55%*
4.33%
DES
50.00%
* indicates performance higher than the state average.
Agenda item 8-b page 14
80.95% 60.87%
SC
37.11% SC
59.21%
WA 55.74% 54.55% 58.49%*
WR 59.30% 57.50% 47.46%
WA 66.13% 59.42% 85.71%*
WR 75.86% 72.50% 64.52%
At-Risk Student Reading Results
Sweetwater County School District #1 PAWS Sweetwater County School District #1 PAWS Sweetwater Count School District #1 PAWS Sweetwater Count School District #1 PAWS Disaggregated Reading Results Disaggregated Reading Results Dissaggregated Reading Results Dissaggregated Reading Results Grade Level/Subject Area/ Area/Year
State
SCSD#1
3rd Grade Reading ELL 2013-2014 3rd Grade Reading ELL 2014-2015 3rd Grade Reading ELL 2015-2016 3rd Grade Reading IEP 2013-2014 3rd Grade Reading IEP 2014-2015 3rd Grade Reading IEP 2015-2016 With Accommodations 2015-2016 WY-ALT 2015-2016 3rd Grade Reading FRL 2013-2014 3rd Grade Reading FRL 2014-2015 3rd Grade Reading FRL 2015-2016
29.44% 20.11% 20.43% 32.43% 31.16% 29.73% 10.38% 71.95% 50.10% 47.29% 44.37%
32.84% 26.53% 19.23% 32.05% 27.71% 31.58%* 12.07% 70.00% 48.44% 43.60% 39.55%
Grade Level/Subject Area/ Area/Year
State
SCSD#1
4th Grade Reading ELL 2013-2014 4th Grade Reading ELL 2014-2015 4th Grade Reading ELL 2015-2016 4th Grade Reading IEP 2013-2014 4th Grade Reading IEP 2014-2015 4th Grade Reading IEP 2015-2016 With Accommodations 2015-2016 WY-ALT 2015-2016
20.70% 13.72% 17.05% 29.98% 28.51% 31.04% 17.42% 74.60%
23.08% 9.68% 18.52%* 21.62% 32.14% 31.25%* 25.86% 83.33%
4th Grade Reading FRL 2013-2014 4th Grade Reading FRL 2014-2015 4th Grade Reading FRL 2015-2016
51.59% 46.76% 53.41%
51.76% 46.77% 50.72%
Grade Level/Subject Area/ Area/Year
State
SCSD#1
5th Grade Reading ELL 2013-2014 5th Grade Reading ELL 2014-2015 5th Grade Reading ELL 2015-2016
12.66% 9.62% 10.86%
0.00% 0.00% 22.22%*
5th Grade Reading IEP 2013-2014 5th Grade Reading IEP 2014-2015 5th Grade Reading IEP 2015-2016 With Accommodations 2015-2016 WY-ALT 2015-2016
26.50% 22.98% 26.25% 13.56% 83.78%
13.24% 14.29% 24.00% 6.00% 87.50%
5th Grade Reading FRL 2013-2014 5th Grade Reading FRL 2014-2015 5th Grade Reading FRL 2015-2016
43.94% 44.39% 47.90%
31.07% 42.16% 41.71%
District Increase or Decrease
Grade Level/Subject Area/ Area/Year
State
6th Grade Reading ELL 2013-2014 6th Grade Reading ELL 2014-2015 6th Grade Reading ELL 2015-2016 6th Grade Reading IEP 2013-2014 6th Grade Reading IEP 2014-2015 6th Grade Reading IEP 2015-2016 With Accommodations 2015-2016 WY-ALT 2015-2016 6th Grade Reading FRL 2013-2014 6th Grade Reading FRL 2014-2015 6th Grade Reading FRL 2015-2016
12.88% 13.39% 9.42% 22.18% 21.90% 19.65% 8.47% 70.00% 43.65% 43.50% 44.69%
Grade Level/Subject Area/ Area/Year
State
7th Grade Reading ELL 2013-2014 7th Grade Reading ELL 2014-2015 7th Grade Reading ELL 2015-2016 7th Grade Reading IEP 2013-2014 7th Grade Reading IEP 2014-2015 7th Grade Reading IEP 2015-2016 With Accommodations 2015-2016 WY-ALT 2015-2016 7th Grade Reading FRL 2013-2014 7th Grade Reading FRL 2014-2015 7th Grade Reading FRL 2015-2016
9.20% 8.33% 14.39% 22.66% 19.42% 20.67% 13.41% 75.38% 46.21% 42.22% 44.22%
Grade Level/Subject Area/ Area/Year
State
8th Grade Reading ELL 2013-2014 8th Grade Reading ELL 2014-2015 8th Grade Reading ELL 2015-2016 8th Grade Reading IEP 2013-2014 8th Grade Reading IEP 2014-2015 8th Grade Reading IEP 2015-2016 With Accommodations 2015-2016 WY-ALT 2015-2016 8th Grade Reading FRL 2013-2014 8th Grade Reading FRL 2014-2015 8th Grade Reading FRL 2015-2016
11.18% 10.00% 11.26% 20.75% 18.34% 16.61% 9.95% 73.91% 42.45% 37.44% 40.35%
District
SCSD#1 Increase or Decrease
-7.30%
3.87%
-4.05% District Increase or Decrease
6.25% 5.56% 0.00% 20.83% 19.40% 26.32%* 6.06% 100.00% 43.28% 37.93% 48.9%*
-5.56%
6.92%
10.97% District
SCSD#1 Increase or Decrease
8.84%
-0.89%
3.95% District Increase or Decrease
7.14% 0.00% 5.00% 17.31% 21.82% 16.13% 10.42% 50.00% 46.10% 47.19% 44.24%*
5.00%
-5.69%
-2.95% District
SCSD#1 Increase or Decrease
22.22%
9.71%
-0.45%
* indicates performance higher than the state average for the spring 2016 state assessment.
20.00% 14.29% 9.09% 25.53% 15.91% 24.00%* 5.56% 100.00% 49.08% 41.84% 45.98%*
-5.20%
8.09%
4.14%
*Indicates performance higher than the state average for the spring 2016 state assessment. * indicates performance higher than the state average for the spring 2016 state assessment.
Agenda item 8-b page 15
District Reading Comparison Sweetwater County School District #1 District PAWS Reading Comparison
Sweetwater County School District #1 District PAWS Reading Comparison
Rank
District
Grade
School Year
Subject
Proficient and Advanced
1 2 3
Lincoln #2 Uinta #1 Albany #1
03 03 03
15-16 15-16 15-16
Reading Reading Reading
4 5 6
Natrona #1 Sweetwater #2 Campbell #1
03 03 03
15-16 15-16 15-16
7 8 9
Laramie #1 Sweetwater #1 Carbon #1
03 03 03
1 2
Albany #1 Lincoln #2
3
Rank
District
Grade
School Year
Subject
Proficient and Advanced
63.27% 62.50% 62.19%
1
Albany #1
06
15-16
Reading
71.14%
2
Lincoln #2
06
15-16
Reading
71.01%
3
Laramie #1
06
15-16
Reading
61.37%
Reading Reading Reading
59.46% 57.01% 53.27%
4 5
Sweetwater #1 Campbell #1
06 06
15-16 15-16
Reading Reading
58.50% 56.63%
6
Sweetwater #2
06
15-16
Reading
56.00%
15-16 15-16 15-16
Reading Reading Reading
52.42% 51.34% 40.13%
7 8
Natrona #1 Uinta #1
06 06
15-16 15-16
Reading Reading
55.05% 52.91%
9
Carbon #1
06
15-16
Reading
45.45%
04 04
15-16 15-16
Reading Reading
73.73% 69.31%
1 2
Lincoln #2 Albany #1
07 07
15-16 15-16
Reading Reading
72.22% 70.86%
Sweetwater #2
04
15-16
Reading
68.95%
3
Sweetwater #1
07
15-16
Reading
63.97%
4 5 6 7
Natrona #1 Campbell #1 Sweetwater #1 Laramie #1
04 04 04 04
15-16 15-16 15-16 15-16
Reading Reading Reading Reading
64.47% 63.58% 63.52% 62.68%
4
Sweetwater #2
07
15-16
Reading
59.52%
5 6
Uinta #1 Campbell #1
07 07
15-16 15-16
Reading Reading
58.70% 58.45%
8 9
Uinta #1 Carbon #1
04 04
15-16 15-16
Reading Reading
62.50% 50.99%
7
Natrona #1
07
15-16
Reading
56.08%
8 9
Carbon #1 Laramie #1
07 07
15-16 15-16
Reading Reading
52.03% 51.28%
1 2
Lincoln #2 Albany #1
05 05
15-16 15-16
Reading Reading
72.22% 66.56%
1
Lincoln #2
08
15-16
Reading
68.16%
3
Uinta #1
05
15-16
Reading
62.04%
4
Natrona #1
05
15-16
Reading
61.55%
2 3
Sweetwater #1 Albany #1
08 08
15-16 15-16
Reading Reading
58.55% 57.19%
5 6 7 8 9
Laramie #1 Sweetwater #2 Campbell #1 Sweetwater #1 Carbon #1
05 05 05 05 05
15-16 15-16 15-16 15-16 15-16
Reading Reading Reading Reading Reading
60.98% 59.52% 57.45% 53.91% 48.92%
4
Laramie #1
08
15-16
Reading
51.63%
5 6
Natrona #1 Uinta #1
08 08
15-16 15-16
Reading Reading
50.75% 50.00%
7
Sweetwater #2
08
15-16
Reading
49.04%
8
Campbell #1
08
15-16
Reading
47.90%
9
Carbon #1
08
15-16
Reading
38.81%
Agenda item 8-b page 16
SCSD#1 Reading Results Celebrations
Next Steps
• The district had two grade levels (4th and 5th) performing above the state average in ELL. • The district had four grade levels (3rd, 4th, 6th and 8th) performing above the state average in the IEP category. • Sixth grade reading performance increased by 6.48%. • Seventh and eighth grade reading performance increased by more than 4%. • Five (4th, 5th ,6th ,7th ,8th grades) of the six grade levels tested saw an increase over last year. • Many schools are performing higher than overall state averages.
• Begin initial implementation of SCSD#1draft English Language Arts (ELA) Curriculum Map. • Continue district common assessments. • Begin looking for researchproven ELA resources. • Continue using professional development time to collaboratively design quality lesson plans. • Continue instructional coach support. • Continue instructional teacher leader support
Agenda item 8-b page 17
What’s Working “Overland Elementary has had training in PLC’s at work and data teams. This year we focused on being a strong data driven professional learning community (PLC). All PLC teams had consistent principal and instructional coach support.”
ing ams n r a e L te effective al a n t o i a s d s e e rof tilized th s, discuss goals, P r u o t g n u “Withi unities, we e assessmenmon learnin Commss to analyzies, set com g.“ ison proce ing strateg lar learnin r r a G on teach onitor scho Shann ementary El and m t Butte nator
Ryan Allen Principal at Overland Elementary
“Having consistency in testing, curriculum and education standards over the last couple of years is one key to improved scores.” Jillian Balow State Superintendent of Public Instruction Agenda item 8-b page 18
at Pilo le III Coordi l a p i c t Prin nts/Ti a r G l Federa
Sweetwater County School District #1 PAWS Science Results
Agenda item 8-b page 19
Sweetwater County School District #1 PAWS Science Results Sweetwater Count School District #1 PAWS Science Results July 14, 2016 Grade Level/Subject Area 4th Grade Science 2013-2014 4th Grade Science 2014-2015 4th Grade Science 2015-2016 8th Grade Science 2013-2014 8th Grade Science 2014-2015 8th Grade Science 2015-2016
State 52.87% 51.34% 54.47% State 47.08% 41.61% 41.57%
SCSD#1 52.21% 49.24% 52.25% SCSD#1 50.25% 43.26% 39.37%
District Increase or Decrease
DES 33%
3.01% District Increase or Decrease
-3.89%
DMS 28.57% 28.75%
DV 41.43% 44.44% 45.76%
FEES 84.62% 50.00% 75.00%*
FEMS 85.71% 55.56% 38.46%
RSJH 50.00% 42.70% 39.59%
LIN 42.86% 47.83%
NP 50.91% 53.70% 46.75%
OV 31.37% 47.89% 63.27%*
SA 44.94% 43.82% 50.00%
SC
51.32%
WA 67.74% 53.62% 78.57%*
WR 64.37% 56.25% 41.94%
on d e t a r t concen g s r e h c n a “Our te onal text duri ti informa ading time.” all d n u C e r s i Kr student tary n e m e l E alnut W t a l a Princip
* indicates performance higher than the state average.
Agenda item 8-b page 20
At-Risk Student Science Results
Sweetwater County School District #1 PAWS Sweetwater Count School District #1 PAWS Disaggregated Science Results Dissaggregated Science Results Grade Level/Subject Area/ Area/Year
State
District
SCSD#1 Increase or Decrease
4th Grade Science ELL 2013-2014 4th Grade Science ELL 2014-2015 4th Grade Science ELL 2015-2016 4th Grade Science IEP 2013-2014 4th Grade Science IEP 2014-2015 4th Grade Science IEP 2015-2016 With Accommodations 2015-2016 WY-ALT 2015-2016 4th Grade Science FRL 2013-2014 4th Grade Science FRL 2014-2015 4th Grade Science FRL 2015-2016
11.76% 10.73% 8.97% 33.00% 30.53% 29.69% 20.33% 50.59% 40.47% 38.14% 41.45%
Grade Level/Subject Area/ Area/Year
State
8th Grade Science ELL 2013-2014 8th Grade Science ELL 2014-2015 8th Grade Science ELL 2015-2016 8th Grade Science IEP 2013-2014 8th Grade Science IEP 2014-2015 8th Grade Science IEP 2015-2016 With Accommodations 2015-2016 WY-ALT 2015-2016 8th Grade Science FRL 2013-2014 8th Grade Science FRL 2014-2015 8th Grade Science FRL 2015-2016
4.82% 4.12% 4.29% 20.69% 15.25% 12.89% 6.66% 67.65% 31.75% 29.24% 27.33%
11.54% 9.38% 17.86%* 35.14% 36.14% 30.00%* 25.00% 66.67% 39.70% 36.96% 37.50%
8.48%
-6.14%
0.54% District
SCSD#1 Increase or Decrease
6.25% 12.50% 7.69%* 23.40% 13.64% 20.00%* 5.26% 100.00% 32.32% 31.47% 26.44%
-4.81%
6.36%
-5.03%
Agenda item 8-b page 21
District Science Comparison Sweetwater County School District #1 District PAWS Science Comparison Grade
School Year
Sweetwater #2 Albany #1
04 04
15-16 15-16
Science Science
Proficient and Advanced 64.74% 62.99%
Lincoln #2
04
15-16
Science
62.69%
4 5
Campbell #1 Natrona #1
04 04
15-16 15-16
Science Science
55.28% 55.10%
6 7
Sweetwater #1
04
15-16
Science
52.25%
Uinta #1 Laramie #1
04 04
15-16 15-16
Science Science
51.85% 49.49%
Carbon #1
04
15-16
Science
34.67%
Lincoln #2
08
15-16
Science
61.69%
Albany #1 Uinta #1
08 08
15-16 15-16
Science Science
43.51% 42.33%
Natrona #1 Sweetwater #1 Campbell #1 Laramie #1
08 08 08 08
15-16 15-16 15-16 15-16
Science Science Science Science
40.38% 39.37% 38.89% 35.04%
Sweetwater #2
08
15-16
Science
31.10%
Carbon #1
08
15-16
Science
24.44%
Rank 1 2 3
8 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
District
Agenda item 8-b page 22
Subject
Science Results Celebrations • Fourth grade science performance increased by 3.01%. • Fourth grade ELL students increased their performance by over 8%. • Six schools saw an increase over last year in science performance by the fourth grade students. • Many schools are performing higher than average state levels.
• •
• •
Next Steps State Science Standards Adoption Curriculum map the newly adopted science standards during the 2017/2018 school year. Continue instructional coaching support. Continue instructional teacher leader support.
Agenda item 8-b page 23
PAWS Results
“We can also see in these results that there is work to be done to close achievement gaps for English language learners, students with disabilities, students on free/ reduced price lunch, and homeless students. Implementation of the Every Student Succeeds Act gives us a really good opportunity to ensure the right resources are getting to those who need them, so that we can create opportunities for every student to keep Wyoming strong.” Jillian Balow
State Superintendent of Public Instruction
Agenda item 8-b page 24
WDE Assessment Update • Wyoming Task Force evaluated our current assessment system • Recommendations include: – Reduced Testing Time – Emphasis on classroom, school and district assessments – Meaningful and timely reporting
• The state test may change next year. – Request for proposals (RFP) for the new state test will go out in September.
Agenda item 8-b page 25
Vision Statement
Mission Statement To provide a quality education for all students.
As an innovative district, united with our community, we empower and inspire all students to academic excellence in pursuit of their interests and passions.
Academic Visioning Curriculum Mapping • Instructional Teacher Leaders • Instructional Coaches • Lesson planning and quality Instruction • Professional Development
Systematic process • Math • PE & Health • ELA (draft) • Info Lit (draft) • Foreign Language (draft)
Assessment System • District Common Assessments • District Assessment Plan
Communication • Stakeholder Involvement • Community Curriculum Council (CCC) • Parent/Teacher Survey Data
Vision Statement: As an innovative district, united with our community, we empower and inspire all students to academic excellence in pursuit of their interests and passions. Agenda item 8-b page 26
AdvancED Improvement Priority Establish a systemic process, guided by the purpose and direction of the district, that will ensure horizontal and vertical alignment of curriculum, assessment, and instruction.
“These positive strides are the result of some great work from our schools, teachers, parents, and students.” Jillian Balow State Superintendent of Public Instruction
f o l l a t a th s t r o f f e d t r n o e p m p u m s o “I c our d n a s r .” r e a h e c y a e t t s our s pa i h t e n o d rn e e v v o a G h c f staf elly M K t n e d n e t n uperi S 1 # D S C
S
Agenda item 8-b page 27
