ISD 300 Goals
ISD 300 Goals Q Comp Site Goals 2012-13:
Elementary School:
Middle School:
The percentage of all students enrolled as of October 1st, 2012 in grades 5-8 at La Crescent Middle School who meet or exceed their fall to spring individual RIT Growth projection on the NWEA MAP in reading will increase from 65.4% to 67.4% in spring 2013.
High School:
The percentage of 2nd - 4th grade students meeting or exceeding their NWEA MAP Math FallSpring RIT growth targets from a baseline of 76.7% in 2011-2012 to a goal of 78.7% meeting or exceeding their growth targets in 2012-2013.
By the year 2013, 63.36% of La Crescent 9th and 10th grade students will meet Fall-Spring MAP Reading RIT growth targets This will represent a 2.0% increase from our current levels. The three year goal in 2011-2012 started at 57.0%.
Bluff Country Learning Center:
During the 2012-2013 school year, 50.0% of BCLC students either taking the GRAD Math test for the first time or retaking it after not passing initially and then completing remediation will achieve a passing score. This will represent an increase of 12.5% from 37.5% in 2012 to 50.0% in 2013.
Innovative Educational System
Lancer learning HD: http://www.isd300.k12.mn.us/pages/La_ CrescentHokah_SD/Departments___Programs/L ancerLearningHD
District wide PLC time: (Early release allows
Adaptive curriculum: (Double blocks of math,
more flexible grouping of staff)
language arts, grade looping, Perpich integrated arts project, project based learning)
Preparing All Learners • IDENTIFICATION OF 21 ST
CENTURY SKILLS THE 4 C’S CREATIVITY CRITICAL THINKING COMMUNICATION
COLLABORATION
Thriving in Ever-Changing, Global Society The State of Minnesota graduated 77.6% of all students in 2012 ISD 300 students compare favorably in college readiness (ACT) La Crescent Schools graduated 97.2% of our students in 2012
Thriving in Ever-Changing, Global Society La Crescent students historically score favorably on the ACT exam when compared to the national and state averages for composite scores. 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009
National State La Crescent 18
20
22
24
26
Average ACT Composite Score
Essential Questions Are students meeting standards? For those who are not meeting standards, are they
growing at a rate making them more likely to meet standards in the future? Are students in special populations subgroups (special education, free/reduced lunch) meeting standards? For those special populations subgroups(special education, free/reduced lunch) not meeting standards, are they growing at a rate making them more likely to meet standards in the future? Are students developing 21st Century Skills?
Are students meeting standards? MCA PROFICIENCY The following graphs show the percent proficiency on the MCA tests. These 4 colors represent the level of performance: RED = does not meet standards YELLOW = partially meets standards GREEN = meets standards BLUE = exceeds standards
The percent of students “proficient” on the MCA is equal to the percent exceeding standards (BLUE) plus the percent meeting standards (GREEN).
8
9
10
12
13
14
For those who are not meeting standards, are they growing at a rate making them more likely to meet standards in the future? NWEA MAP TESTING The stacked bar graphs that follow display in GREEN the percent of students meeting growth targets and in RED the percent of students NOT meeting growth targets. NWEA MAP Fall-Spring growth targets are based upon the average growth achieved by students in the NWEA normative sample with the same previous Spring RIT score.
Are students in special population subgroups (special education, free/reduced lunch) meeting standards?
READING AND MATH PROFICIENCY (MCA) RED = does not meet standards YELLOW = partially meets standards GREEN = meets standards BLUE = exceeds standards
MCA-III Reading Percent Proficient 2013 by Special Population - Elementary
22
MCA-III Math Percent Proficient 2013 by Special Population - Elementary
23
MCA-III Reading Percent Proficient 2013 by Special Population – Middle School
24
MCA-III Math Percent Proficient 2013 by Special Population – Middle School
25
MCA-III Reading Percent Proficient 2013 by Special Population – High School
26
MCA-II Math Percent Proficient 2013 by Special Population – High School (Grade 11)
27
For those special population subgroups not meeting standards, are they growing at a rate making them more likely to meet standards in the future?
NWEA MAP TESTING
The stacked bar graphs that follow display in GREEN the percent of students meeting growth targets and in RED the percent of students NOT meeting growth targets.
NWEA MAP Reading Percent Meeting Fall-Spring Growth Targets 2012-2013 by Special Population - Elementary
29
NWEA MAP Math Percent Meeting Fall-Spring Growth Targets 2012-2013 by Special Population - Elementary
30
NWEA MAP Reading Percent Meeting FallSpring Growth Targets 2012-2013 by Special Population – Middle School
31
NWEA MAP Math Percent Meeting FallSpring Growth Targets 2012-2013 by Special Population – Middle School
32
NWEA MAP Reading Percent Meeting Fall-Spring Growth Targets 2012-2013 by Special Population – High School
33
NWEA MAP Math Percent Meeting Fall-Spring Growth Targets 2012-2013 by Special Population – High School
34
MMR Scores
A school’s Multiple Measurement Rating (MMR) is a percentage and is calculated by adding up the number of points out of a possible 25 the school earned in each applicable domain (e.g., Proficiency, Growth, Achievement Gap Reduction and Graduation Rate) and dividing by the total possible applicable points. Example: An Elementary School has 15 points in Proficiency, 15 in Growth, 15 in Achievement Gap Reduction. Total of 45 points out of 75 for an MMR score of 45/75 or 60%
Proficiency Domain A school’s score in this domain is the percent of subgroup
cells whose total index points is equal to or greater than the statewide target for that subgroup cell weighted by the size of the subgroup cell. State targets are set to close the achievement gap by 50% in 6 years Cells need to be 20 or more students Index points are based on the number of students who partially meet, meet, or exceed standards Example: If all sub groups meet or exceed target, score is 1.00 or 100%
Growth Domain A school’s score in this domain is the average of each of the
individual student growth z-scores for all students who have a 2012 and prior year MCA Math or Reading score. The z-score represents how much growth a student had compared to other students in the state. Example: 8th grade math scores for a school are less than the state average, they would have a negative score based on how close or far they deviated from the average. (-0.5)
Achievement Gap Reduction Domain It measures the degree to which the growth of students in
those special population subgroup cells closes the gap between their performance and the performance of their majority subgroup cell peers across the state. Example: ISD300 Special Education students compared to non-special education statewide.
MMR 2013 School
Prof.
Growth
Ach. G.
Grad.
Total
MMR %
Elem.
7.42
4.68
5.92
NA
18.02/75
24.03
Middle
24.94
11.06
13.06
NA
49.06/75 65.41
H.S.
24.97
21.65
23.92
24.96
95.5/100 95.5
Are students developing 21st Century Skills?
CREATIVITY CRITICAL THINKING COMMUNICATION COLLABORATION
Lancer Successes Based on final transcript requests ISD 300 students
upon graduating in 2013: 49% are headed to a 4 year College/University 24% are headed to a Technical College/2 year campus 4% are headed to Military Service
24% are headed to the workforce/other
Elementary School:
Middle School:
The percentage of all students enrolled as of October 1st, 2012 in grades 5-8 at La Crescent Middle School who meet or exceed their fall to spring individual RIT Growth projection on the NWEA MAP in reading will increase from 65.4% to 67.4% in spring 2013.
High School:
The percentage of 2nd - 4th grade students meeting or exceeding their NWEA MAP Math FallSpring RIT growth targets from a baseline of 76.7% in 2011-2012 to a goal of 78.7% meeting or exceeding their growth targets in 2012-2013.
By the year 2013, 63.36% of La Crescent 9th and 10th grade students will meet Fall-Spring MAP Reading RIT growth targets This will represent a 2.0% increase from our current levels. The three year goal in 2011-2012 started at 57.0%.
Bluff Country Learning Center:
During the 2012-2013 school year, 50.0% of BCLC students either taking the GRAD Math test for the first time or retaking it after not passing initially and then completing remediation will achieve a passing score. This will represent an increase of 12.5% from 37.5% in 2012 to 50.0% in 2013.
Innovative Educational System
Lancer learning HD: http://www.isd300.k12.mn.us/pages/La_ CrescentHokah_SD/Departments___Programs/L ancerLearningHD
District wide PLC time: (Early release allows
Adaptive curriculum: (Double blocks of math,
more flexible grouping of staff)
language arts, grade looping, Perpich integrated arts project, project based learning)
Preparing All Learners • IDENTIFICATION OF 21 ST
CENTURY SKILLS THE 4 C’S CREATIVITY CRITICAL THINKING COMMUNICATION
COLLABORATION
Thriving in Ever-Changing, Global Society The State of Minnesota graduated 77.6% of all students in 2012 ISD 300 students compare favorably in college readiness (ACT) La Crescent Schools graduated 97.2% of our students in 2012
Thriving in Ever-Changing, Global Society La Crescent students historically score favorably on the ACT exam when compared to the national and state averages for composite scores. 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009
National State La Crescent 18
20
22
24
26
Average ACT Composite Score
Essential Questions Are students meeting standards? For those who are not meeting standards, are they
growing at a rate making them more likely to meet standards in the future? Are students in special populations subgroups (special education, free/reduced lunch) meeting standards? For those special populations subgroups(special education, free/reduced lunch) not meeting standards, are they growing at a rate making them more likely to meet standards in the future? Are students developing 21st Century Skills?
Are students meeting standards? MCA PROFICIENCY The following graphs show the percent proficiency on the MCA tests. These 4 colors represent the level of performance: RED = does not meet standards YELLOW = partially meets standards GREEN = meets standards BLUE = exceeds standards
The percent of students “proficient” on the MCA is equal to the percent exceeding standards (BLUE) plus the percent meeting standards (GREEN).
8
9
10
12
13
14
For those who are not meeting standards, are they growing at a rate making them more likely to meet standards in the future? NWEA MAP TESTING The stacked bar graphs that follow display in GREEN the percent of students meeting growth targets and in RED the percent of students NOT meeting growth targets. NWEA MAP Fall-Spring growth targets are based upon the average growth achieved by students in the NWEA normative sample with the same previous Spring RIT score.
Are students in special population subgroups (special education, free/reduced lunch) meeting standards?
READING AND MATH PROFICIENCY (MCA) RED = does not meet standards YELLOW = partially meets standards GREEN = meets standards BLUE = exceeds standards
MCA-III Reading Percent Proficient 2013 by Special Population - Elementary
22
MCA-III Math Percent Proficient 2013 by Special Population - Elementary
23
MCA-III Reading Percent Proficient 2013 by Special Population – Middle School
24
MCA-III Math Percent Proficient 2013 by Special Population – Middle School
25
MCA-III Reading Percent Proficient 2013 by Special Population – High School
26
MCA-II Math Percent Proficient 2013 by Special Population – High School (Grade 11)
27
For those special population subgroups not meeting standards, are they growing at a rate making them more likely to meet standards in the future?
NWEA MAP TESTING
The stacked bar graphs that follow display in GREEN the percent of students meeting growth targets and in RED the percent of students NOT meeting growth targets.
NWEA MAP Reading Percent Meeting Fall-Spring Growth Targets 2012-2013 by Special Population - Elementary
29
NWEA MAP Math Percent Meeting Fall-Spring Growth Targets 2012-2013 by Special Population - Elementary
30
NWEA MAP Reading Percent Meeting FallSpring Growth Targets 2012-2013 by Special Population – Middle School
31
NWEA MAP Math Percent Meeting FallSpring Growth Targets 2012-2013 by Special Population – Middle School
32
NWEA MAP Reading Percent Meeting Fall-Spring Growth Targets 2012-2013 by Special Population – High School
33
NWEA MAP Math Percent Meeting Fall-Spring Growth Targets 2012-2013 by Special Population – High School
34
MMR Scores
A school’s Multiple Measurement Rating (MMR) is a percentage and is calculated by adding up the number of points out of a possible 25 the school earned in each applicable domain (e.g., Proficiency, Growth, Achievement Gap Reduction and Graduation Rate) and dividing by the total possible applicable points. Example: An Elementary School has 15 points in Proficiency, 15 in Growth, 15 in Achievement Gap Reduction. Total of 45 points out of 75 for an MMR score of 45/75 or 60%
Proficiency Domain A school’s score in this domain is the percent of subgroup
cells whose total index points is equal to or greater than the statewide target for that subgroup cell weighted by the size of the subgroup cell. State targets are set to close the achievement gap by 50% in 6 years Cells need to be 20 or more students Index points are based on the number of students who partially meet, meet, or exceed standards Example: If all sub groups meet or exceed target, score is 1.00 or 100%
Growth Domain A school’s score in this domain is the average of each of the
individual student growth z-scores for all students who have a 2012 and prior year MCA Math or Reading score. The z-score represents how much growth a student had compared to other students in the state. Example: 8th grade math scores for a school are less than the state average, they would have a negative score based on how close or far they deviated from the average. (-0.5)
Achievement Gap Reduction Domain It measures the degree to which the growth of students in
those special population subgroup cells closes the gap between their performance and the performance of their majority subgroup cell peers across the state. Example: ISD300 Special Education students compared to non-special education statewide.
MMR 2013 School
Prof.
Growth
Ach. G.
Grad.
Total
MMR %
Elem.
7.42
4.68
5.92
NA
18.02/75
24.03
Middle
24.94
11.06
13.06
NA
49.06/75 65.41
H.S.
24.97
21.65
23.92
24.96
95.5/100 95.5
Are students developing 21st Century Skills?
CREATIVITY CRITICAL THINKING COMMUNICATION COLLABORATION
Lancer Successes Based on final transcript requests ISD 300 students
upon graduating in 2013: 49% are headed to a 4 year College/University 24% are headed to a Technical College/2 year campus 4% are headed to Military Service
24% are headed to the workforce/other
