RFI #77
RFI #77 Tiger Construction Ltd 6280 Everson Goshen Road Everson, Washington 98247 Phone: 360-966-7252 Fax: 360-966-2506
Project: 201606 - Marysville Pilchuck High School Cafeteria Commons Replacement Project 5611 108th St. NE Marysville, Washington 98271
Low Voltage System Tie-in Ewing Elec RFI-012 TO:
Lisa Senn (Hutteball & Oremus Architecture) 4010 Lake Washington Blvd NE Suite 320 Kirkland, Washington 98033
FROM:
Bill Perry (Tiger Construction Ltd) 6280 Everson Goshen Road Everson, Washington 98247
DATE INITIATED:
08/16/ 2016
STATUS:
Open
LOCATION:
DUE DATE:
08/19/2016
COST CODE:
REFERENCE:
COST IMPACT:
SCHEDULE IMPACT:
DRAWING NUMBER:
SPEC SECTION:
LINKED DRAWINGS: RECEIVED FROM:
Erik Sorensen (Ewing Electric, Inc.)
COPIES TO: John Bingham (Construction Services Group), Bill Chaput (Hutteball & Oremus Architecture), Cathy Ettienne-Augustin (Coffman Engineers, Inc.), Paul Jones (Coffman Engineers, Inc.), Brent Peterson (Tiger Construction Ltd), Lisa Senn (Hutteball & Oremus Architecture)
Question from Bill Perry (Tiger Construction Ltd) at 09:12 AM on 08/16/2016 I have a question about the systems (i.e. data, fire alarm, intercom) tie in to the old building. I would like to run open cable where to conduit runs enter K-building administrations area. (see attached). The administrations area has a T-bar ceiling and I would like to not have to run conduits in the T-bar ceiling. The open cable runs would be for the data and intercom systems only, not the fire alarm. I talked to John Bingham with the school and he said it would be ok with him but I should send a RFI to the architect to to see if it was ok. Would this be and acceptable installation method? Please advise. Attachments: MPC RFI12 Low Voltage System Tie-in.pdf
All Replies:
This is acceptable. - HOA 08/18/2016
BY
Tiger Construction Ltd
DATE
COPIES TO
Page 1 of 1
Printed On: 08/16/2016 09:31 AM
From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Attachments:
Jones, Paul Lisa Senn Bill Chaput Re: MPHS - RFI#077 Wednesday, August 17, 2016 9:13:58 AM image001.png
Lisa This is acceptable to us. Would you mind responding to the RFI, I am out of the office till Friday Thanks Sent from my iPad > On Aug 16, 2016, at 1:59 PM, "Lisa Senn" wrote: > > Good Afternoon Paul, > > I’ve attached RFI#077 for your review and comment. If you have any questions, please let me know. > > Thank you > > Lisa Senn > Intern Architect > > [cid:[email protected]] > > 4010 Lake Washington Blvd. NE, Suite 320 Kirkland, WA > p 425 828 8948 f 425 828 9067 i www.hoarch.com > > > <MPHS FCR-RFI077 Low Voltage System Tie-In.pdf>
RFI# 12
Request for Information Low Voltage System Tie-in
Commercial and Industrial Contractors 539 Main St / PO Box 1238 Edmonds, WA 98020 Tel 425-778-3773 Fax 425-776-3711
[email protected]
To: Tiger Construction, Ltd
Project:
6280 Everson Goshen Road
Ewing Request No.
Everson, WA 98247
Attn:
12
Request Date:
8.15.2016
Originated By:
Erik Sorensen
Bill Perry
Subject:
Low Voltage System Tie-in
Priority: Impact:
MPHS Food Commons Replacement
Critical Cost:
Potential
High Schedule:
Normal Work:
potential
Request / Suggestion: I have a question about the systems (i.e. data, fire alarm, intercom) tie in to the old building. I would like to run open cable where to conduit runs enter K-building administrations area. (see attached). The administrations area has a T-bar ceiling and I would like to not have to run conduits in the T-bar ceiling. The open cable runs would be for the data and intercom systems only, not the fire alarm. I talked to John Bingham with the school and he said it would be ok with him but I should send a RFI to the architect to to see if it was ok. Would this be and acceptable installation method? Please advise.
In order to maintain current contract schedule, please reply on or before: Please let this serve as written notice that project time delay and associated costs may be incurred if a comprehensive answer is not received by the indicated date noted above. If the returned information represents new work elements, expanded scope, revisions requiring analysis, layout/field coordination, or other elements of additional cost, we herein request the attachment of an owner's request for change proposal.
Response by:
Company:
Date:
Project: 201606 - Marysville Pilchuck High School Cafeteria Commons Replacement Project 5611 108th St. NE Marysville, Washington 98271
Low Voltage System Tie-in Ewing Elec RFI-012 TO:
Lisa Senn (Hutteball & Oremus Architecture) 4010 Lake Washington Blvd NE Suite 320 Kirkland, Washington 98033
FROM:
Bill Perry (Tiger Construction Ltd) 6280 Everson Goshen Road Everson, Washington 98247
DATE INITIATED:
08/16/ 2016
STATUS:
Open
LOCATION:
DUE DATE:
08/19/2016
COST CODE:
REFERENCE:
COST IMPACT:
SCHEDULE IMPACT:
DRAWING NUMBER:
SPEC SECTION:
LINKED DRAWINGS: RECEIVED FROM:
Erik Sorensen (Ewing Electric, Inc.)
COPIES TO: John Bingham (Construction Services Group), Bill Chaput (Hutteball & Oremus Architecture), Cathy Ettienne-Augustin (Coffman Engineers, Inc.), Paul Jones (Coffman Engineers, Inc.), Brent Peterson (Tiger Construction Ltd), Lisa Senn (Hutteball & Oremus Architecture)
Question from Bill Perry (Tiger Construction Ltd) at 09:12 AM on 08/16/2016 I have a question about the systems (i.e. data, fire alarm, intercom) tie in to the old building. I would like to run open cable where to conduit runs enter K-building administrations area. (see attached). The administrations area has a T-bar ceiling and I would like to not have to run conduits in the T-bar ceiling. The open cable runs would be for the data and intercom systems only, not the fire alarm. I talked to John Bingham with the school and he said it would be ok with him but I should send a RFI to the architect to to see if it was ok. Would this be and acceptable installation method? Please advise. Attachments: MPC RFI12 Low Voltage System Tie-in.pdf
All Replies:
This is acceptable. - HOA 08/18/2016
BY
Tiger Construction Ltd
DATE
COPIES TO
Page 1 of 1
Printed On: 08/16/2016 09:31 AM
From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Attachments:
Jones, Paul Lisa Senn Bill Chaput Re: MPHS - RFI#077 Wednesday, August 17, 2016 9:13:58 AM image001.png
Lisa This is acceptable to us. Would you mind responding to the RFI, I am out of the office till Friday Thanks Sent from my iPad > On Aug 16, 2016, at 1:59 PM, "Lisa Senn" wrote: > > Good Afternoon Paul, > > I’ve attached RFI#077 for your review and comment. If you have any questions, please let me know. > > Thank you > > Lisa Senn > Intern Architect > > [cid:[email protected]] > > 4010 Lake Washington Blvd. NE, Suite 320 Kirkland, WA > p 425 828 8948 f 425 828 9067 i www.hoarch.com > > > <MPHS FCR-RFI077 Low Voltage System Tie-In.pdf>
RFI# 12
Request for Information Low Voltage System Tie-in
Commercial and Industrial Contractors 539 Main St / PO Box 1238 Edmonds, WA 98020 Tel 425-778-3773 Fax 425-776-3711
[email protected]
To: Tiger Construction, Ltd
Project:
6280 Everson Goshen Road
Ewing Request No.
Everson, WA 98247
Attn:
12
Request Date:
8.15.2016
Originated By:
Erik Sorensen
Bill Perry
Subject:
Low Voltage System Tie-in
Priority: Impact:
MPHS Food Commons Replacement
Critical Cost:
Potential
High Schedule:
Normal Work:
potential
Request / Suggestion: I have a question about the systems (i.e. data, fire alarm, intercom) tie in to the old building. I would like to run open cable where to conduit runs enter K-building administrations area. (see attached). The administrations area has a T-bar ceiling and I would like to not have to run conduits in the T-bar ceiling. The open cable runs would be for the data and intercom systems only, not the fire alarm. I talked to John Bingham with the school and he said it would be ok with him but I should send a RFI to the architect to to see if it was ok. Would this be and acceptable installation method? Please advise.
In order to maintain current contract schedule, please reply on or before: Please let this serve as written notice that project time delay and associated costs may be incurred if a comprehensive answer is not received by the indicated date noted above. If the returned information represents new work elements, expanded scope, revisions requiring analysis, layout/field coordination, or other elements of additional cost, we herein request the attachment of an owner's request for change proposal.
Response by:
Company:
Date:
