SIWANOY SCHOOL - SCHOOL REPORT CARD DATA [2015 - 16]
SIWANOY SCHOOL ENROLLMENT (2015 - 16) K-12 ENROLLMENT
280
ENROLLMENT BY GENDER MALE
FEMALE
151
54%
129
46%
ENROLLMENT BY ETHNICITY GROUP
TOTAL
PERCENT
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
5
2%
HISPANIC OR LATINO
22
8%
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER
17
6%
WHITE
222
79%
MULTIRACIAL
14
5%
OTHER GROUPS ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
—
33
—
—
12%
—
ENROLLMENT BY GRADE GROUP
TOTAL
PERCENT
K (FULL DAY)
42
15%
1ST GRADE
47
17%
2ND GRADE
43
15%
3RD GRADE
57
20%
4TH GRADE
44
16%
5TH GRADE
47
17%
1 of 15
FREE AND REDUCED-PRICE LUNCH (2015 - 16) ELIGIBLE FOR FREE LUNCH
1
ELIGIBLE FOR REDUCED-PRICE LUNCH
0%
2
1%
2 of 15
GRADE 3 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the pro ciency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 pro ciency rates.
100 75%
74%
District: 2016
61%
50 25
School: 2016
88%
75
4%
7%
0
27%
9% 20%
1
35%
31%
2
12%
12%
3
42%
Statewide: 2016
7%
4
3-4
Percentage Scoring at Levels
MEAN SCORE: 336 GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
PROFICIENT
LEVEL 1
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 3
LEVEL 4
ALL STUDENTS
57
88%
2
4%
5
9%
43
75%
7
12%
GENERAL EDUCATION
51
92%
0
0%
4
8%
40
78%
7
14%
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
6
50%
2
33%
1
17%
3
50%
0
0%
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
3
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
1
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
HISPANIC OR LATINO
6
83%
0
0%
1
17%
3
50%
2
33%
WHITE
45
89%
1
2%
4
9%
35
78%
5
11%
MULTIRACIAL
2
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
6
83%
1
17%
0
0%
5
83%
0
0%
FEMALE
26
92%
0
0%
2
8%
18
69%
6
23%
MALE
31
84%
2
6%
3
10%
25
81%
1
3%
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
57
88%
2
4%
5
9%
43
75%
7
12%
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
2
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
55
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
NOT MIGRANT
57
88%
2
4%
5
9%
43
75%
7
12%
3 of 15
GRADE 4 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the pro ciency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 pro ciency rates.
80 60%
40 20
School: 2016
74%
60 34% 5%
5%
0
24%
37%
35%
1
Statewide: 2016
29%
26%
21%
District: 2016
41%
37%
32%
15%
2
3
4
3-4
Percentage Scoring at Levels
MEAN SCORE: 332 GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
PROFICIENT
LEVEL 1
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 3
LEVEL 4
ALL STUDENTS
43
74%
2
5%
9
21%
16
37%
16
37%
GENERAL EDUCATION
38
84%
0
0%
6
16%
16
42%
16
42%
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
5
0%
2
40%
3
60%
0
0%
0
0%
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
2
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
HISPANIC OR LATINO
2
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
WHITE
37
70%
2
5%
9
24%
13
35%
13
35%
MULTIRACIAL
2
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
6
100%
0
0%
0
0%
3
50%
3
50%
FEMALE
11
82%
1
9%
1
9%
6
55%
3
27%
MALE
32
72%
1
3%
8
25%
10
31%
13
41%
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
43
74%
2
5%
9
21%
16
37%
16
37%
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
43
74%
2
5%
9
21%
16
37%
16
37%
NOT MIGRANT
43
74%
2
5%
9
21%
16
37%
16
37%
4 of 15
GRADE 5 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the pro ciency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 pro ciency rates.
80 60
66%
40 20
47% 36% 4%
8%
0
30%
1
27%
District: 2016
44%
30%
23%
2
School: 2016
65%
21%
19%
3
33%
10%
4
Statewide: 2016
3-4
Percentage Scoring at Levels
MEAN SCORE: 325 GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
PROFICIENT
LEVEL 1
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 3
LEVEL 4
ALL STUDENTS
47
66%
2
4%
14
30%
22
47%
9
19%
GENERAL EDUCATION
41
73%
2
5%
9
22%
21
51%
9
22%
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
6
17%
0
0%
5
83%
1
17%
0
0%
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
4
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
1
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
HISPANIC OR LATINO
2
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
WHITE
40
65%
2
5%
12
30%
19
48%
7
18%
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
7
71%
0
0%
2
29%
3
43%
2
29%
FEMALE
27
74%
1
4%
6
22%
12
44%
8
30%
MALE
20
55%
1
5%
8
40%
10
50%
1
5%
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
47
66%
2
4%
14
30%
22
47%
9
19%
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
1
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
46
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
NOT MIGRANT
47
66%
2
4%
14
30%
22
47%
9
19%
5 of 15
GRADE 3 MATHEMATICS Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the pro ciency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 pro ciency rates.
100
District: 2016
70%
50 25
School: 2016
86%
75 56% 2%
10%
0
25%
12% 20%
1
31%
30%
2
44%
41% 29%
22%
Statewide: 2016
22%
3
4
3-4
Percentage Scoring at Levels
MEAN SCORE: 337 GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
PROFICIENT
LEVEL 1
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 3
LEVEL 4
ALL STUDENTS
57
86%
1
2%
7
12%
17
30%
32
56%
GENERAL EDUCATION
51
90%
0
0%
5
10%
16
31%
30
59%
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
6
50%
1
17%
2
33%
1
17%
2
33%
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
3
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
1
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
HISPANIC OR LATINO
6
67%
0
0%
2
33%
1
17%
3
50%
WHITE
45
91%
0
0%
4
9%
15
33%
26
58%
MULTIRACIAL
2
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
6
67%
1
17%
1
17%
1
17%
3
50%
FEMALE
26
96%
0
0%
1
4%
9
35%
16
62%
MALE
31
77%
1
3%
6
19%
8
26%
16
52%
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
57
86%
1
2%
7
12%
17
30%
32
56%
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
2
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
55
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
NOT MIGRANT
57
86%
1
2%
7
12%
17
30%
32
56%
6 of 15
GRADE 4 MATHEMATICS Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the pro ciency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 pro ciency rates.
80 74%
60 40 20
2%
7%
0
28%
23%
1
19%
37%
28%
23%
2
District: 2016
45%
40%
37%
34%
School: 2016
74%
Statewide: 2016
21%
3
4
3-4
Percentage Scoring at Levels
MEAN SCORE: 332 GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
PROFICIENT
LEVEL 1
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 3
LEVEL 4
ALL STUDENTS
43
74%
1
2%
10
23%
16
37%
16
37%
GENERAL EDUCATION
38
82%
0
0%
7
18%
15
39%
16
42%
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
5
20%
1
20%
3
60%
1
20%
0
0%
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
2
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
HISPANIC OR LATINO
2
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
WHITE
37
70%
1
3%
10
27%
13
35%
13
35%
MULTIRACIAL
2
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
6
100%
0
0%
0
0%
3
50%
3
50%
FEMALE
11
73%
1
9%
2
18%
5
45%
3
27%
MALE
32
75%
0
0%
8
25%
11
34%
13
41%
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
43
74%
1
2%
10
23%
16
37%
16
37%
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
43
74%
1
2%
10
23%
16
37%
16
37%
NOT MIGRANT
43
74%
1
2%
10
23%
16
37%
16
37%
7 of 15
GRADE 5 MATHEMATICS Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the pro ciency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 pro ciency rates.
100 75
81%
50 25
53% 9%
9%
0
32%
11%
28%
28%
34%
1
2
43%
24%
14%
School: 2016
77%
District: 2016 40%
Statewide: 2016
16%
3
4
3-4
Percentage Scoring at Levels
MEAN SCORE: 342 GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
PROFICIENT
LEVEL 1
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 3
LEVEL 4
ALL STUDENTS
47
81%
4
9%
5
11%
13
28%
25
53%
GENERAL EDUCATION
41
85%
3
7%
3
7%
11
27%
24
59%
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
6
50%
1
17%
2
33%
2
33%
1
17%
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
4
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
1
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
HISPANIC OR LATINO
2
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
WHITE
40
80%
3
8%
5
13%
11
28%
21
53%
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
7
86%
1
14%
0
0%
2
29%
4
57%
FEMALE
27
85%
3
11%
1
4%
7
26%
16
59%
MALE
20
75%
1
5%
4
20%
6
30%
9
45%
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
47
81%
4
9%
5
11%
13
28%
25
53%
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
1
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
46
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
NOT MIGRANT
47
81%
4
9%
5
11%
13
28%
25
53%
8 of 15
GRADE 4 SCIENCE Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the pro ciency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 pro ciency rates.
100
98%
75
70%
50 25
98%
School: 2016
89%
District: 2016
68% 52%
0%
0%
0
3%
2%
1
1%
8%
28%
2
Statewide: 2016
36%
30%
3
4
3-4
Percentage Scoring at Levels
MEAN SCORE: 88 GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
PROFICIENT
LEVEL 1
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 3
LEVEL 4
ALL STUDENTS
43
98%
0
0%
1
2%
12
28%
30
70%
GENERAL EDUCATION
37
100%
0
0%
0
0%
7
19%
30
81%
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
6
83%
0
0%
1
17%
5
83%
0
0%
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
2
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
HISPANIC OR LATINO
2
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
WHITE
37
97%
0
0%
1
3%
12
32%
24
65%
MULTIRACIAL
2
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
6
100%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
6
100%
FEMALE
12
92%
0
0%
1
8%
3
25%
8
67%
MALE
31
100%
0
0%
0
0%
9
29%
22
71%
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
43
98%
0
0%
1
2%
12
28%
30
70%
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
43
98%
0
0%
1
2%
12
28%
30
70%
NOT MIGRANT
43
98%
0
0%
1
2%
12
28%
30
70%
9 of 15
STATEWIDE RESULTS ON THE NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL PROGRESS: NAEP (2014 - 15)
GRADE: 4 READING GROUP ALL STUDENTS
BELOW BASIC
BASIC
PROFICIENT
ADVANCED
32%
32%
27%
9%
PARTICIPATION RATE
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASK…
*%
*%
*%
*%
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN…
20%
30%
33%
17%
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICA…
48%
34%
15%
3%
HISPANIC OR LATINO
44%
37%
17%
2%
WHITE
20%
31%
37%
12%
*%
*%
*%
*%
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
70%
22%
7%
1%
98
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNE…
74%
21%
4%
1%
88
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANT…
43%
36%
18%
3%
MULTIRACIAL
MATHEMATICS GROUP ALL STUDENTS
BELOW BASIC
BASIC
PROFICIENT
ADVANCED
PARTICIPATION RATE
21%
44%
30%
5%
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASK…
*%
*%
*%
*%
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN…
12%
31%
42%
15%
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICA…
40%
46%
13%
1%
HISPANIC OR LATINO
28%
51%
20%
1%
WHITE
12%
41%
40%
7%
*%
*%
*%
*%
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
49%
39%
10%
2%
98
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNE…
56%
35%
9%
*%
91
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANT…
29%
48%
21%
2%
MULTIRACIAL
GRADE: 8 READING GROUP ALL STUDENTS
BELOW BASIC
BASIC
PROFICIENT
ADVANCED 4%
PARTICIPATION RATE
27%
40%
29%
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASK…
*%
*%
*%
*%
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN…
19%
39%
34%
8%
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICA…
42%
41%
16%
1%
HISPANIC OR LATINO
35%
43%
20%
2%
WHITE
18%
39%
38%
5%
*%
*%
*%
*%
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
59%
33%
8%
*%
98
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNE…
78%
19%
3%
*%
89
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANT…
36%
42%
21%
1%
MULTIRACIAL
MATHEMATICS GROUP ALL STUDENTS AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASK…
BELOW BASIC
BASIC
PROFICIENT
ADVANCED
31%
38%
24%
7%
*%
*%
*%
*%
PARTICIPATION RATE
10 of 15
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN…
18%
30%
33%
19%
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICA…
48%
37%
13%
2%
HISPANIC OR LATINO
41%
40%
16%
3%
WHITE
20%
40%
31%
9%
*%
*%
*%
*%
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
64%
27%
8%
1%
99
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNE…
72%
21%
6%
1%
94
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANT…
40%
39%
17%
4%
MULTIRACIAL
11 of 15
ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE-LEVEL ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS RESULTS FOR ACCOUNTABILITY
ALL ACCOUNTABILITY GROUPS MADE AYP: YES GROUP
ALL STUDENTS
MADE AYP
TESTED 95%
STUDENTS ENROLLE PERCENT OF ENROL PI >= EAMO OR SAFE TESTED STUDENTS D DURING THE TEST LED STUDENTS WIT HARBOR TARGET ENROLLED ON BEDS ADMINISTRATION P H VALID TEST SCOR DAY ERIOD ES
PI
EAMO
SAFE HARBOR TARG ET
YES
YES
148
99%
YES
147
173
95
95
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
―
―
0
―
―
0
―
―
―
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
―
―
2
―
―
2
―
―
―
HISPANIC OR LATINO
―
―
10
―
―
10
―
―
―
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
―
―
9
―
―
9
―
―
―
WHITE
YES
YES
123
99%
YES
122
171
110
110
MULTIRACIAL
―
―
4
―
―
4
―
―
―
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
―
―
18
―
―
17
―
―
―
LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENT
―
―
0
―
―
0
―
―
―
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
―
―
3
―
―
3
―
―
―
RESULTS FOR THE FOLLOWING GROUPS ARE NOT USED TO DETERMINE AYP. GROUP
STUDENTS ENROLLED DURING THE TEST ADM PERCENT OF ENROLLED STUDENTS WITH VAL TESTED STUDENTS ENROLLED ON BEDS DAY INISTRATION PERIOD ID TEST SCORES
PI
NOT AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
148
99%
147
173
NOT BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
146
99%
145
174
NOT HISPANIC OR LATINO
138
99%
137
172
NOT ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PA…
139
99%
138
172
NOT WHITE
25
―
25
―
NOT MULTIRACIAL
144
99%
143
172
GENERAL EDUCATION
130
100%
130
182
ENGLISH PROFICIENT
148
99%
147
173
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
145
99%
144
173
MALE
83
100%
83
167
FEMALE
65
98%
64
180
MIGRANT NOT MIGRANT
0
―
0
―
148
99%
147
173
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
12 of 15
ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE-LEVEL MATHEMATICS RESULTS FOR ACCOUNTABILITY
ALL ACCOUNTABILITY GROUPS MADE AYP: YES GROUP
ALL STUDENTS
MADE AYP
TESTED 95%
STUDENTS ENROLLE PERCENT OF ENROL PI >= EAMO OR SAFE TESTED STUDENTS D DURING THE TEST LED STUDENTS WIT HARBOR TARGET ENROLLED ON BEDS ADMINISTRATION P H VALID TEST SCOR DAY ERIOD ES
PI
EAMO
SAFE HARBOR TARG ET
YES
YES
148
99%
YES
147
177
92
92
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
―
―
0
―
―
0
―
―
―
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
―
―
2
―
―
2
―
―
―
HISPANIC OR LATINO
―
―
10
―
―
10
―
―
―
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
―
―
9
―
―
9
―
―
―
WHITE
YES
YES
123
99%
YES
122
178
106
106
MULTIRACIAL
―
―
4
―
―
4
―
―
―
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
―
―
18
―
―
17
―
―
―
LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENT
―
―
0
―
―
0
―
―
―
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
―
―
3
―
―
3
―
―
―
RESULTS FOR THE FOLLOWING GROUPS ARE NOT USED TO DETERMINE AYP. GROUP
STUDENTS ENROLLED DURING THE TEST ADM PERCENT OF ENROLLED STUDENTS WITH VAL TESTED STUDENTS ENROLLED ON BEDS DAY INISTRATION PERIOD ID TEST SCORES
PI
NOT AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
148
99%
147
177
NOT BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
146
99%
145
179
NOT HISPANIC OR LATINO
138
99%
137
177
NOT ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PA…
139
99%
138
176
NOT WHITE
25
―
25
―
NOT MULTIRACIAL
144
99%
143
176
GENERAL EDUCATION
130
100%
130
184
ENGLISH PROFICIENT
148
99%
147
177
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
145
99%
144
176
MALE
83
100%
83
173
FEMALE
65
98%
64
181
MIGRANT NOT MIGRANT
0
―
0
―
148
99%
147
177
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
13 of 15
ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE-LEVEL SCIENCE RESULTS FOR ACCOUNTABILITY
ALL ACCOUNTABILITY GROUPS MADE AYP: YES GROUP
ALL STUDENTS
MADE AYP
TESTED 80%
STUDENTS ENROLLE PERCENT OF ENROL PI >= EAMO OR PRO TESTED STUDENTS D DURING THE TEST LED STUDENTS WIT GRESS TARGET ENROLLED ON BEDS ADMINISTRATION P H VALID TEST SCOR DAY ERIOD ES
PI
EAMO
PROGRESS TARGET
YES
YES
43
100%
YES
43
198
172
172
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
―
―
0
―
―
0
―
―
―
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
―
―
0
―
―
0
―
―
―
HISPANIC OR LATINO
―
―
2
―
―
2
―
―
―
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
―
―
2
―
―
2
―
―
―
WHITE
YES
―
37
―
YES
37
197
178
178
MULTIRACIAL
―
―
2
―
―
2
―
―
―
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
―
―
6
―
―
6
―
―
―
LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENT
―
―
0
―
―
0
―
―
―
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
―
―
0
―
―
0
―
―
―
RESULTS FOR THE FOLLOWING GROUPS ARE NOT USED TO DETERMINE AYP. GROUP
STUDENTS ENROLLED DURING THE TEST ADM PERCENT OF ENROLLED STUDENTS WITH VAL TESTED STUDENTS ENROLLED ON BEDS DAY INISTRATION PERIOD ID TEST SCORES
PI
NOT AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
43
100%
43
198
NOT BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
43
100%
43
198
NOT HISPANIC OR LATINO
41
100%
41
198
NOT ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PA…
41
100%
41
198
NOT WHITE
6
―
6
―
NOT MULTIRACIAL
41
100%
41
198
GENERAL EDUCATION
37
―
37
200
ENGLISH PROFICIENT
43
100%
43
198
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
43
100%
43
198
MALE
31
―
31
200
FEMALE
12
―
12
―
MIGRANT
0
―
0
―
NOT MIGRANT
43
100%
43
198
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Progress Target data are suppressed.
14 of 15
UNWEIGHTED COMBINED ELA AND MATH PIS GROUP
ELEMENTARY/ MIDDLE-LEVEL ELA PI
ELEMENTARY/ MIDDLE-LEVEL MATH PI
SECONDARY-LEVEL ELA PI
SECONDARY-LEVEL MATH PI
UNWEIGHTED COMBINED PI
173
177
―
―
175
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
―
―
―
―
0
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
―
―
―
―
0
HISPANIC OR LATINO
―
―
―
―
0
ALL STUDENTS
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
―
―
―
―
0
171
178
―
―
175
MULTIRACIAL
―
―
―
―
0
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
―
―
―
―
0
LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENT
―
―
―
―
0
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
―
―
―
―
0
WHITE
― There were not enough students to determine a Performance Index.