2016 | PROSPECT HILL SCHOOL - Report Card | NYSED Data Site
PROSPECT HILL SCHOOL - SCHOOL REPORT CARD DATA [2015 - 16]
PROSPECT HILL SCHOOL ENROLLMENT (2015 - 16) K-12 ENROLLMENT
303
ENROLLMENT BY GENDER MALE
FEMALE
167
55%
136
45%
ENROLLMENT BY ETHNICITY GROUP
TOTAL
PERCENT
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
7
2%
HISPANIC OR LATINO
38
13%
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER
12
4%
WHITE
231
76%
MULTIRACIAL
15
5%
OTHER GROUPS ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
—
30
14
—
10%
5%
ENROLLMENT BY GRADE GROUP
TOTAL
PERCENT
K (FULL DAY)
44
15%
1ST GRADE
35
12%
2ND GRADE
53
17%
3RD GRADE
53
17%
4TH GRADE
64
21%
5TH GRADE
54
18%
1 of 15
FREE AND REDUCED-PRICE LUNCH (2015 - 16) ELIGIBLE FOR FREE LUNCH
8
ELIGIBLE FOR REDUCED-PRICE LUNCH
3%
3
1%
2 of 15
GRADE 3 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the pro ciency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 pro ciency rates.
100 75
75%
50 25
59% 8%
7%
0
27%
18%
1
20%
School: 2016 74%
District: 2016
61% 35%
31%
12%
42%
Statewide: 2016
7%
16%
2
3
4
3-4
Percentage Scoring at Levels
MEAN SCORE: 333 GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
PROFICIENT
LEVEL 1
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 3
LEVEL 4
ALL STUDENTS
51
75%
4
8%
9
18%
30
59%
8
16%
GENERAL EDUCATION
47
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
4
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
1
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
2
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
HISPANIC OR LATINO
2
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
WHITE
44
73%
4
9%
8
18%
25
57%
7
16%
MULTIRACIAL
2
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
7
86%
0
0%
1
14%
5
71%
1
14%
FEMALE
24
83%
1
4%
3
13%
15
63%
5
21%
MALE
27
67%
3
11%
6
22%
15
56%
3
11%
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
50
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
1
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
3
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
48
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
NOT MIGRANT
51
75%
4
8%
9
18%
30
59%
8
16%
3 of 15
GRADE 4 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the pro ciency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 pro ciency rates.
80 60 52%
40 20
47% 34%
2%
5%
0
35%
28%
24%
1
School: 2016
60%
2
32%
District: 2016
41%
Statewide: 2016
29%
26%
19%
15%
3
4
3-4
Percentage Scoring at Levels
MEAN SCORE: 320 GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
PROFICIENT
LEVEL 1
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 3
LEVEL 4
ALL STUDENTS
58
47%
1
2%
30
52%
16
28%
11
19%
GENERAL EDUCATION
53
49%
1
2%
26
49%
15
28%
11
21%
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
5
20%
0
0%
4
80%
1
20%
0
0%
HISPANIC OR LATINO
10
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
WHITE
44
50%
1
2%
21
48%
12
27%
10
23%
MULTIRACIAL
4
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
14
36%
0
0%
9
64%
4
29%
1
7%
FEMALE
29
59%
0
0%
12
41%
8
28%
9
31%
MALE
29
34%
1
3%
18
62%
8
28%
2
7%
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
58
47%
1
2%
30
52%
16
28%
11
19%
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
4
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
54
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
NOT MIGRANT
58
47%
1
2%
30
52%
16
28%
11
19%
4 of 15
GRADE 5 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the pro ciency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 pro ciency rates.
80 60
65% 48%
40 20
36% 8%
8%
0
27%
1
27%
District: 2016
44%
30%
23%
2
School: 2016
65%
21%
17%
3
33%
10%
4
Statewide: 2016
3-4
Percentage Scoring at Levels
MEAN SCORE: 320 GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
PROFICIENT
LEVEL 1
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 3
LEVEL 4
ALL STUDENTS
52
65%
4
8%
14
27%
25
48%
9
17%
GENERAL EDUCATION
48
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
4
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
1
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
HISPANIC OR LATINO
5
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
WHITE
43
65%
3
7%
12
28%
20
47%
8
19%
MULTIRACIAL
3
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
9
67%
1
11%
2
22%
5
56%
1
11%
FEMALE
26
81%
0
0%
5
19%
17
65%
4
15%
MALE
26
50%
4
15%
9
35%
8
31%
5
19%
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
52
65%
4
8%
14
27%
25
48%
9
17%
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
4
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
48
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
NOT MIGRANT
52
65%
4
8%
14
27%
25
48%
9
17%
5 of 15
GRADE 3 MATHEMATICS Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the pro ciency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 pro ciency rates.
80 73%
60 51%
40 20
10%
0
25%
31% 20%
1
22%
20%
2
29%
22%
District: 2016
44%
41% 8%
School: 2016
70%
Statewide: 2016
22%
3
4
3-4
Percentage Scoring at Levels
MEAN SCORE: 330 GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
PROFICIENT
LEVEL 1
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 3
LEVEL 4
ALL STUDENTS
51
73%
4
8%
10
20%
11
22%
26
51%
GENERAL EDUCATION
47
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
4
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
1
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
2
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
HISPANIC OR LATINO
2
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
WHITE
44
68%
4
9%
10
23%
9
20%
21
48%
MULTIRACIAL
2
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
7
100%
0
0%
0
0%
2
29%
5
71%
FEMALE
24
75%
2
8%
4
17%
4
17%
14
58%
MALE
27
70%
2
7%
6
22%
7
26%
12
44%
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
50
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
1
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
3
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
48
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
NOT MIGRANT
51
73%
4
8%
10
20%
11
22%
26
51%
6 of 15
GRADE 4 MATHEMATICS Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the pro ciency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 pro ciency rates.
80 74%
60 40 20
40% 5%
7%
0
28%
21%
1
19%
28%
34% 23%
2
District: 2016
45%
40%
34%
School: 2016
74%
Statewide: 2016
21%
3
4
3-4
Percentage Scoring at Levels
MEAN SCORE: 329 GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
PROFICIENT
LEVEL 1
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 3
LEVEL 4
ALL STUDENTS
58
74%
3
5%
12
21%
23
40%
20
34%
GENERAL EDUCATION
53
77%
2
4%
10
19%
22
42%
19
36%
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
5
40%
1
20%
2
40%
1
20%
1
20%
HISPANIC OR LATINO
10
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
WHITE
44
73%
2
5%
10
23%
16
36%
16
36%
MULTIRACIAL
4
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
14
79%
1
7%
2
14%
7
50%
4
29%
FEMALE
29
79%
1
3%
5
17%
10
34%
13
45%
MALE
29
69%
2
7%
7
24%
13
45%
7
24%
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
58
74%
3
5%
12
21%
23
40%
20
34%
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
4
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
54
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
NOT MIGRANT
58
74%
3
5%
12
21%
23
40%
20
34%
7 of 15
GRADE 5 MATHEMATICS Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the pro ciency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 pro ciency rates.
100 75
73%
School: 2016
77%
District: 2016
50 25
8%
9%
0
41%
32% 20%
1
28%
43%
34%
2
31%
24%
14%
40%
Statewide: 2016
16%
3
4
3-4
Percentage Scoring at Levels
MEAN SCORE: 330 GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
PROFICIENT
LEVEL 1
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 3
LEVEL 4
ALL STUDENTS
51
73%
4
8%
10
20%
21
41%
16
31%
GENERAL EDUCATION
47
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
4
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
1
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
HISPANIC OR LATINO
5
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
WHITE
42
71%
3
7%
9
21%
16
38%
14
33%
MULTIRACIAL
3
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
9
78%
1
11%
1
11%
5
56%
2
22%
FEMALE
26
77%
1
4%
5
19%
10
38%
10
38%
MALE
25
68%
3
12%
5
20%
11
44%
6
24%
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
51
73%
4
8%
10
20%
21
41%
16
31%
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
4
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
47
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
NOT MIGRANT
51
73%
4
8%
10
20%
21
41%
16
31%
8 of 15
GRADE 4 SCIENCE Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the pro ciency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 pro ciency rates.
100
100%
75
25
0%
0%
0
3%
0%
1
1%
37%
8%
2
School: 2016
89%
District: 2016
68%
63%
50
98%
52%
Statewide: 2016
36%
30%
3
4
3-4
Percentage Scoring at Levels
MEAN SCORE: 86 GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
PROFICIENT
LEVEL 1
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 3
LEVEL 4
ALL STUDENTS
63
100%
0
0%
0
0%
23
37%
40
63%
GENERAL EDUCATION
58
100%
0
0%
0
0%
20
34%
38
66%
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
5
100%
0
0%
0
0%
3
60%
2
40%
HISPANIC OR LATINO
11
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
WHITE
48
100%
0
0%
0
0%
19
40%
29
60%
MULTIRACIAL
4
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
15
100%
0
0%
0
0%
4
27%
11
73%
FEMALE
32
100%
0
0%
0
0%
12
38%
20
63%
MALE
31
100%
0
0%
0
0%
11
35%
20
65%
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
63
100%
0
0%
0
0%
23
37%
40
63%
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
4
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
59
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
NOT MIGRANT
63
100%
0
0%
0
0%
23
37%
40
63%
9 of 15
STATEWIDE RESULTS ON THE NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL PROGRESS: NAEP (2014 - 15)
GRADE: 4 READING GROUP ALL STUDENTS
BELOW BASIC
BASIC
PROFICIENT
ADVANCED
32%
32%
27%
9%
PARTICIPATION RATE
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASK…
*%
*%
*%
*%
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN…
20%
30%
33%
17%
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICA…
48%
34%
15%
3%
HISPANIC OR LATINO
44%
37%
17%
2%
WHITE
20%
31%
37%
12%
*%
*%
*%
*%
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
70%
22%
7%
1%
98
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNE…
74%
21%
4%
1%
88
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANT…
43%
36%
18%
3%
MULTIRACIAL
MATHEMATICS GROUP ALL STUDENTS
BELOW BASIC
BASIC
PROFICIENT
ADVANCED
PARTICIPATION RATE
21%
44%
30%
5%
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASK…
*%
*%
*%
*%
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN…
12%
31%
42%
15%
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICA…
40%
46%
13%
1%
HISPANIC OR LATINO
28%
51%
20%
1%
WHITE
12%
41%
40%
7%
*%
*%
*%
*%
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
49%
39%
10%
2%
98
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNE…
56%
35%
9%
*%
91
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANT…
29%
48%
21%
2%
MULTIRACIAL
GRADE: 8 READING GROUP ALL STUDENTS
BELOW BASIC
BASIC
PROFICIENT
ADVANCED 4%
PARTICIPATION RATE
27%
40%
29%
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASK…
*%
*%
*%
*%
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN…
19%
39%
34%
8%
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICA…
42%
41%
16%
1%
HISPANIC OR LATINO
35%
43%
20%
2%
WHITE
18%
39%
38%
5%
*%
*%
*%
*%
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
59%
33%
8%
*%
98
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNE…
78%
19%
3%
*%
89
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANT…
36%
42%
21%
1%
MULTIRACIAL
MATHEMATICS GROUP ALL STUDENTS AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASK…
BELOW BASIC
BASIC
PROFICIENT
ADVANCED
31%
38%
24%
7%
*%
*%
*%
*%
PARTICIPATION RATE
10 of 15
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN…
18%
30%
33%
19%
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICA…
48%
37%
13%
2%
HISPANIC OR LATINO
41%
40%
16%
3%
WHITE
20%
40%
31%
9%
*%
*%
*%
*%
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
64%
27%
8%
1%
99
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNE…
72%
21%
6%
1%
94
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANT…
40%
39%
17%
4%
MULTIRACIAL
11 of 15
ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE-LEVEL ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS RESULTS FOR ACCOUNTABILITY
ALL ACCOUNTABILITY GROUPS MADE AYP: YES GROUP
ALL STUDENTS
MADE AYP
TESTED 95%
STUDENTS ENROLLE PERCENT OF ENROL PI >= EAMO OR SAFE TESTED STUDENTS D DURING THE TEST LED STUDENTS WIT HARBOR TARGET ENROLLED ON BEDS ADMINISTRATION P H VALID TEST SCOR DAY ERIOD ES
PI
EAMO
SAFE HARBOR TARG ET
YES
YES
168
96%
YES
161
156
96
96
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
―
―
0
―
―
0
―
―
―
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
―
―
3
―
―
3
―
―
―
HISPANIC OR LATINO
―
―
18
―
―
17
―
―
―
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
―
―
1
―
―
1
―
―
―
WHITE
YES
YES
137
96%
YES
131
156
110
110
MULTIRACIAL
―
―
9
―
―
9
―
―
―
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
―
―
13
―
―
13
―
―
―
LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENT
―
―
1
―
―
1
―
―
―
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
―
―
11
―
―
11
―
―
―
RESULTS FOR THE FOLLOWING GROUPS ARE NOT USED TO DETERMINE AYP. GROUP
STUDENTS ENROLLED DURING THE TEST ADM PERCENT OF ENROLLED STUDENTS WITH VAL TESTED STUDENTS ENROLLED ON BEDS DAY INISTRATION PERIOD ID TEST SCORES
PI
NOT AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
168
96%
161
156
NOT BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
165
96%
158
156
NOT HISPANIC OR LATINO
150
96%
144
159
NOT ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PA…
167
96%
160
156
NOT WHITE
31
―
30
153
NOT MULTIRACIAL
159
96%
152
154
GENERAL EDUCATION
155
95%
148
159
ENGLISH PROFICIENT
167
96%
160
156
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
157
96%
150
159
MALE
86
95%
82
140
FEMALE
82
96%
79
172
MIGRANT NOT MIGRANT
0
―
0
―
168
96%
161
156
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
12 of 15
ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE-LEVEL MATHEMATICS RESULTS FOR ACCOUNTABILITY
ALL ACCOUNTABILITY GROUPS MADE AYP: YES GROUP
ALL STUDENTS
MADE AYP
TESTED 95%
STUDENTS ENROLLE PERCENT OF ENROL PI >= EAMO OR SAFE TESTED STUDENTS D DURING THE TEST LED STUDENTS WIT HARBOR TARGET ENROLLED ON BEDS ADMINISTRATION P H VALID TEST SCOR DAY ERIOD ES
PI
EAMO
SAFE HARBOR TARG ET
YES
YES
168
95%
YES
160
166
93
93
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
―
―
0
―
―
0
―
―
―
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
―
―
3
―
―
3
―
―
―
HISPANIC OR LATINO
―
―
18
―
―
17
―
―
―
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
―
―
1
―
―
1
―
―
―
WHITE
YES
YES
137
95%
YES
130
164
106
106
MULTIRACIAL
―
―
9
―
―
9
―
―
―
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
―
―
13
―
―
13
―
―
―
LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENT
―
―
1
―
―
1
―
―
―
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
―
―
11
―
―
11
―
―
―
RESULTS FOR THE FOLLOWING GROUPS ARE NOT USED TO DETERMINE AYP. GROUP
STUDENTS ENROLLED DURING THE TEST ADM PERCENT OF ENROLLED STUDENTS WITH VAL TESTED STUDENTS ENROLLED ON BEDS DAY INISTRATION PERIOD ID TEST SCORES
PI
NOT AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
168
95%
160
166
NOT BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
165
95%
157
166
NOT HISPANIC OR LATINO
150
95%
143
166
NOT ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PA…
167
95%
159
166
NOT WHITE
31
―
30
177
NOT MULTIRACIAL
159
95%
151
164
GENERAL EDUCATION
155
95%
147
170
ENGLISH PROFICIENT
167
95%
159
166
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
157
95%
149
169
MALE
174*
95%*
81
160
82
96%
79
172
FEMALE MIGRANT NOT MIGRANT
0
―
0
―
168
95%
160
166
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. *The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion.
13 of 15
ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE-LEVEL SCIENCE RESULTS FOR ACCOUNTABILITY
ALL ACCOUNTABILITY GROUPS MADE AYP: YES GROUP
ALL STUDENTS
MADE AYP
TESTED 80%
STUDENTS ENROLLE PERCENT OF ENROL PI >= EAMO OR PRO TESTED STUDENTS D DURING THE TEST LED STUDENTS WIT GRESS TARGET ENROLLED ON BEDS ADMINISTRATION P H VALID TEST SCOR DAY ERIOD ES
PI
EAMO
PROGRESS TARGET
YES
YES
63
100%
YES
63
200
175
175
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
―
―
0
―
―
0
―
―
―
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
―
―
0
―
―
0
―
―
―
HISPANIC OR LATINO
―
―
11
―
―
11
―
―
―
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
―
―
0
―
―
0
―
―
―
WHITE
YES
YES
48
100%
YES
48
200
180
180
MULTIRACIAL
―
―
4
―
―
4
―
―
―
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
―
―
5
―
―
5
―
―
―
LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENT
―
―
0
―
―
0
―
―
―
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
―
―
4
―
―
4
―
―
―
RESULTS FOR THE FOLLOWING GROUPS ARE NOT USED TO DETERMINE AYP. GROUP
STUDENTS ENROLLED DURING THE TEST ADM PERCENT OF ENROLLED STUDENTS WITH VAL TESTED STUDENTS ENROLLED ON BEDS DAY INISTRATION PERIOD ID TEST SCORES
PI
NOT AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
63
100%
63
200
NOT BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
63
100%
63
200
NOT HISPANIC OR LATINO
52
100%
52
200
NOT ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PA…
63
100%
63
200
NOT WHITE
15
―
15
―
NOT MULTIRACIAL
59
100%
59
200
GENERAL EDUCATION
58
100%
58
200
ENGLISH PROFICIENT
63
100%
63
200
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
59
100%
59
200
MALE
31
―
31
200
FEMALE
32
―
32
200
MIGRANT
0
―
0
―
NOT MIGRANT
63
100%
63
200
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Progress Target data are suppressed.
14 of 15
UNWEIGHTED COMBINED ELA AND MATH PIS GROUP
ELEMENTARY/ MIDDLE-LEVEL ELA PI
ELEMENTARY/ MIDDLE-LEVEL MATH PI
SECONDARY-LEVEL ELA PI
SECONDARY-LEVEL MATH PI
UNWEIGHTED COMBINED PI
156
166
―
―
161
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
―
―
―
―
0
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
―
―
―
―
0
HISPANIC OR LATINO
―
―
―
―
0
ALL STUDENTS
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
―
―
―
―
0
156
164
―
―
160
MULTIRACIAL
―
―
―
―
0
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
―
―
―
―
0
LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENT
―
―
―
―
0
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
―
―
―
―
0
WHITE
― There were not enough students to determine a Performance Index.
© COPYRIGHT NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. THIS DOCUMENT WAS CREATED ON: NOVEMBER 17, 2016, 8:48 AM EST
15 of 15
PROSPECT HILL SCHOOL ENROLLMENT (2015 - 16) K-12 ENROLLMENT
303
ENROLLMENT BY GENDER MALE
FEMALE
167
55%
136
45%
ENROLLMENT BY ETHNICITY GROUP
TOTAL
PERCENT
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
7
2%
HISPANIC OR LATINO
38
13%
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER
12
4%
WHITE
231
76%
MULTIRACIAL
15
5%
OTHER GROUPS ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
—
30
14
—
10%
5%
ENROLLMENT BY GRADE GROUP
TOTAL
PERCENT
K (FULL DAY)
44
15%
1ST GRADE
35
12%
2ND GRADE
53
17%
3RD GRADE
53
17%
4TH GRADE
64
21%
5TH GRADE
54
18%
1 of 15
FREE AND REDUCED-PRICE LUNCH (2015 - 16) ELIGIBLE FOR FREE LUNCH
8
ELIGIBLE FOR REDUCED-PRICE LUNCH
3%
3
1%
2 of 15
GRADE 3 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the pro ciency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 pro ciency rates.
100 75
75%
50 25
59% 8%
7%
0
27%
18%
1
20%
School: 2016 74%
District: 2016
61% 35%
31%
12%
42%
Statewide: 2016
7%
16%
2
3
4
3-4
Percentage Scoring at Levels
MEAN SCORE: 333 GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
PROFICIENT
LEVEL 1
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 3
LEVEL 4
ALL STUDENTS
51
75%
4
8%
9
18%
30
59%
8
16%
GENERAL EDUCATION
47
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
4
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
1
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
2
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
HISPANIC OR LATINO
2
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
WHITE
44
73%
4
9%
8
18%
25
57%
7
16%
MULTIRACIAL
2
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
7
86%
0
0%
1
14%
5
71%
1
14%
FEMALE
24
83%
1
4%
3
13%
15
63%
5
21%
MALE
27
67%
3
11%
6
22%
15
56%
3
11%
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
50
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
1
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
3
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
48
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
NOT MIGRANT
51
75%
4
8%
9
18%
30
59%
8
16%
3 of 15
GRADE 4 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the pro ciency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 pro ciency rates.
80 60 52%
40 20
47% 34%
2%
5%
0
35%
28%
24%
1
School: 2016
60%
2
32%
District: 2016
41%
Statewide: 2016
29%
26%
19%
15%
3
4
3-4
Percentage Scoring at Levels
MEAN SCORE: 320 GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
PROFICIENT
LEVEL 1
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 3
LEVEL 4
ALL STUDENTS
58
47%
1
2%
30
52%
16
28%
11
19%
GENERAL EDUCATION
53
49%
1
2%
26
49%
15
28%
11
21%
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
5
20%
0
0%
4
80%
1
20%
0
0%
HISPANIC OR LATINO
10
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
WHITE
44
50%
1
2%
21
48%
12
27%
10
23%
MULTIRACIAL
4
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
14
36%
0
0%
9
64%
4
29%
1
7%
FEMALE
29
59%
0
0%
12
41%
8
28%
9
31%
MALE
29
34%
1
3%
18
62%
8
28%
2
7%
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
58
47%
1
2%
30
52%
16
28%
11
19%
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
4
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
54
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
NOT MIGRANT
58
47%
1
2%
30
52%
16
28%
11
19%
4 of 15
GRADE 5 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the pro ciency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 pro ciency rates.
80 60
65% 48%
40 20
36% 8%
8%
0
27%
1
27%
District: 2016
44%
30%
23%
2
School: 2016
65%
21%
17%
3
33%
10%
4
Statewide: 2016
3-4
Percentage Scoring at Levels
MEAN SCORE: 320 GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
PROFICIENT
LEVEL 1
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 3
LEVEL 4
ALL STUDENTS
52
65%
4
8%
14
27%
25
48%
9
17%
GENERAL EDUCATION
48
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
4
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
1
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
HISPANIC OR LATINO
5
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
WHITE
43
65%
3
7%
12
28%
20
47%
8
19%
MULTIRACIAL
3
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
9
67%
1
11%
2
22%
5
56%
1
11%
FEMALE
26
81%
0
0%
5
19%
17
65%
4
15%
MALE
26
50%
4
15%
9
35%
8
31%
5
19%
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
52
65%
4
8%
14
27%
25
48%
9
17%
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
4
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
48
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
NOT MIGRANT
52
65%
4
8%
14
27%
25
48%
9
17%
5 of 15
GRADE 3 MATHEMATICS Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the pro ciency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 pro ciency rates.
80 73%
60 51%
40 20
10%
0
25%
31% 20%
1
22%
20%
2
29%
22%
District: 2016
44%
41% 8%
School: 2016
70%
Statewide: 2016
22%
3
4
3-4
Percentage Scoring at Levels
MEAN SCORE: 330 GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
PROFICIENT
LEVEL 1
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 3
LEVEL 4
ALL STUDENTS
51
73%
4
8%
10
20%
11
22%
26
51%
GENERAL EDUCATION
47
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
4
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
1
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
2
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
HISPANIC OR LATINO
2
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
WHITE
44
68%
4
9%
10
23%
9
20%
21
48%
MULTIRACIAL
2
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
7
100%
0
0%
0
0%
2
29%
5
71%
FEMALE
24
75%
2
8%
4
17%
4
17%
14
58%
MALE
27
70%
2
7%
6
22%
7
26%
12
44%
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
50
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
1
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
3
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
48
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
NOT MIGRANT
51
73%
4
8%
10
20%
11
22%
26
51%
6 of 15
GRADE 4 MATHEMATICS Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the pro ciency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 pro ciency rates.
80 74%
60 40 20
40% 5%
7%
0
28%
21%
1
19%
28%
34% 23%
2
District: 2016
45%
40%
34%
School: 2016
74%
Statewide: 2016
21%
3
4
3-4
Percentage Scoring at Levels
MEAN SCORE: 329 GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
PROFICIENT
LEVEL 1
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 3
LEVEL 4
ALL STUDENTS
58
74%
3
5%
12
21%
23
40%
20
34%
GENERAL EDUCATION
53
77%
2
4%
10
19%
22
42%
19
36%
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
5
40%
1
20%
2
40%
1
20%
1
20%
HISPANIC OR LATINO
10
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
WHITE
44
73%
2
5%
10
23%
16
36%
16
36%
MULTIRACIAL
4
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
14
79%
1
7%
2
14%
7
50%
4
29%
FEMALE
29
79%
1
3%
5
17%
10
34%
13
45%
MALE
29
69%
2
7%
7
24%
13
45%
7
24%
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
58
74%
3
5%
12
21%
23
40%
20
34%
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
4
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
54
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
NOT MIGRANT
58
74%
3
5%
12
21%
23
40%
20
34%
7 of 15
GRADE 5 MATHEMATICS Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the pro ciency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 pro ciency rates.
100 75
73%
School: 2016
77%
District: 2016
50 25
8%
9%
0
41%
32% 20%
1
28%
43%
34%
2
31%
24%
14%
40%
Statewide: 2016
16%
3
4
3-4
Percentage Scoring at Levels
MEAN SCORE: 330 GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
PROFICIENT
LEVEL 1
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 3
LEVEL 4
ALL STUDENTS
51
73%
4
8%
10
20%
21
41%
16
31%
GENERAL EDUCATION
47
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
4
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
1
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
HISPANIC OR LATINO
5
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
WHITE
42
71%
3
7%
9
21%
16
38%
14
33%
MULTIRACIAL
3
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
9
78%
1
11%
1
11%
5
56%
2
22%
FEMALE
26
77%
1
4%
5
19%
10
38%
10
38%
MALE
25
68%
3
12%
5
20%
11
44%
6
24%
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
51
73%
4
8%
10
20%
21
41%
16
31%
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
4
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
47
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
NOT MIGRANT
51
73%
4
8%
10
20%
21
41%
16
31%
8 of 15
GRADE 4 SCIENCE Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the pro ciency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 pro ciency rates.
100
100%
75
25
0%
0%
0
3%
0%
1
1%
37%
8%
2
School: 2016
89%
District: 2016
68%
63%
50
98%
52%
Statewide: 2016
36%
30%
3
4
3-4
Percentage Scoring at Levels
MEAN SCORE: 86 GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
PROFICIENT
LEVEL 1
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 3
LEVEL 4
ALL STUDENTS
63
100%
0
0%
0
0%
23
37%
40
63%
GENERAL EDUCATION
58
100%
0
0%
0
0%
20
34%
38
66%
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
5
100%
0
0%
0
0%
3
60%
2
40%
HISPANIC OR LATINO
11
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
WHITE
48
100%
0
0%
0
0%
19
40%
29
60%
MULTIRACIAL
4
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
15
100%
0
0%
0
0%
4
27%
11
73%
FEMALE
32
100%
0
0%
0
0%
12
38%
20
63%
MALE
31
100%
0
0%
0
0%
11
35%
20
65%
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
63
100%
0
0%
0
0%
23
37%
40
63%
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
4
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
59
_%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
NOT MIGRANT
63
100%
0
0%
0
0%
23
37%
40
63%
9 of 15
STATEWIDE RESULTS ON THE NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL PROGRESS: NAEP (2014 - 15)
GRADE: 4 READING GROUP ALL STUDENTS
BELOW BASIC
BASIC
PROFICIENT
ADVANCED
32%
32%
27%
9%
PARTICIPATION RATE
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASK…
*%
*%
*%
*%
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN…
20%
30%
33%
17%
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICA…
48%
34%
15%
3%
HISPANIC OR LATINO
44%
37%
17%
2%
WHITE
20%
31%
37%
12%
*%
*%
*%
*%
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
70%
22%
7%
1%
98
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNE…
74%
21%
4%
1%
88
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANT…
43%
36%
18%
3%
MULTIRACIAL
MATHEMATICS GROUP ALL STUDENTS
BELOW BASIC
BASIC
PROFICIENT
ADVANCED
PARTICIPATION RATE
21%
44%
30%
5%
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASK…
*%
*%
*%
*%
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN…
12%
31%
42%
15%
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICA…
40%
46%
13%
1%
HISPANIC OR LATINO
28%
51%
20%
1%
WHITE
12%
41%
40%
7%
*%
*%
*%
*%
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
49%
39%
10%
2%
98
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNE…
56%
35%
9%
*%
91
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANT…
29%
48%
21%
2%
MULTIRACIAL
GRADE: 8 READING GROUP ALL STUDENTS
BELOW BASIC
BASIC
PROFICIENT
ADVANCED 4%
PARTICIPATION RATE
27%
40%
29%
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASK…
*%
*%
*%
*%
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN…
19%
39%
34%
8%
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICA…
42%
41%
16%
1%
HISPANIC OR LATINO
35%
43%
20%
2%
WHITE
18%
39%
38%
5%
*%
*%
*%
*%
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
59%
33%
8%
*%
98
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNE…
78%
19%
3%
*%
89
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANT…
36%
42%
21%
1%
MULTIRACIAL
MATHEMATICS GROUP ALL STUDENTS AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASK…
BELOW BASIC
BASIC
PROFICIENT
ADVANCED
31%
38%
24%
7%
*%
*%
*%
*%
PARTICIPATION RATE
10 of 15
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN…
18%
30%
33%
19%
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICA…
48%
37%
13%
2%
HISPANIC OR LATINO
41%
40%
16%
3%
WHITE
20%
40%
31%
9%
*%
*%
*%
*%
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
64%
27%
8%
1%
99
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNE…
72%
21%
6%
1%
94
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANT…
40%
39%
17%
4%
MULTIRACIAL
11 of 15
ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE-LEVEL ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS RESULTS FOR ACCOUNTABILITY
ALL ACCOUNTABILITY GROUPS MADE AYP: YES GROUP
ALL STUDENTS
MADE AYP
TESTED 95%
STUDENTS ENROLLE PERCENT OF ENROL PI >= EAMO OR SAFE TESTED STUDENTS D DURING THE TEST LED STUDENTS WIT HARBOR TARGET ENROLLED ON BEDS ADMINISTRATION P H VALID TEST SCOR DAY ERIOD ES
PI
EAMO
SAFE HARBOR TARG ET
YES
YES
168
96%
YES
161
156
96
96
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
―
―
0
―
―
0
―
―
―
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
―
―
3
―
―
3
―
―
―
HISPANIC OR LATINO
―
―
18
―
―
17
―
―
―
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
―
―
1
―
―
1
―
―
―
WHITE
YES
YES
137
96%
YES
131
156
110
110
MULTIRACIAL
―
―
9
―
―
9
―
―
―
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
―
―
13
―
―
13
―
―
―
LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENT
―
―
1
―
―
1
―
―
―
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
―
―
11
―
―
11
―
―
―
RESULTS FOR THE FOLLOWING GROUPS ARE NOT USED TO DETERMINE AYP. GROUP
STUDENTS ENROLLED DURING THE TEST ADM PERCENT OF ENROLLED STUDENTS WITH VAL TESTED STUDENTS ENROLLED ON BEDS DAY INISTRATION PERIOD ID TEST SCORES
PI
NOT AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
168
96%
161
156
NOT BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
165
96%
158
156
NOT HISPANIC OR LATINO
150
96%
144
159
NOT ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PA…
167
96%
160
156
NOT WHITE
31
―
30
153
NOT MULTIRACIAL
159
96%
152
154
GENERAL EDUCATION
155
95%
148
159
ENGLISH PROFICIENT
167
96%
160
156
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
157
96%
150
159
MALE
86
95%
82
140
FEMALE
82
96%
79
172
MIGRANT NOT MIGRANT
0
―
0
―
168
96%
161
156
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
12 of 15
ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE-LEVEL MATHEMATICS RESULTS FOR ACCOUNTABILITY
ALL ACCOUNTABILITY GROUPS MADE AYP: YES GROUP
ALL STUDENTS
MADE AYP
TESTED 95%
STUDENTS ENROLLE PERCENT OF ENROL PI >= EAMO OR SAFE TESTED STUDENTS D DURING THE TEST LED STUDENTS WIT HARBOR TARGET ENROLLED ON BEDS ADMINISTRATION P H VALID TEST SCOR DAY ERIOD ES
PI
EAMO
SAFE HARBOR TARG ET
YES
YES
168
95%
YES
160
166
93
93
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
―
―
0
―
―
0
―
―
―
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
―
―
3
―
―
3
―
―
―
HISPANIC OR LATINO
―
―
18
―
―
17
―
―
―
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
―
―
1
―
―
1
―
―
―
WHITE
YES
YES
137
95%
YES
130
164
106
106
MULTIRACIAL
―
―
9
―
―
9
―
―
―
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
―
―
13
―
―
13
―
―
―
LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENT
―
―
1
―
―
1
―
―
―
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
―
―
11
―
―
11
―
―
―
RESULTS FOR THE FOLLOWING GROUPS ARE NOT USED TO DETERMINE AYP. GROUP
STUDENTS ENROLLED DURING THE TEST ADM PERCENT OF ENROLLED STUDENTS WITH VAL TESTED STUDENTS ENROLLED ON BEDS DAY INISTRATION PERIOD ID TEST SCORES
PI
NOT AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
168
95%
160
166
NOT BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
165
95%
157
166
NOT HISPANIC OR LATINO
150
95%
143
166
NOT ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PA…
167
95%
159
166
NOT WHITE
31
―
30
177
NOT MULTIRACIAL
159
95%
151
164
GENERAL EDUCATION
155
95%
147
170
ENGLISH PROFICIENT
167
95%
159
166
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
157
95%
149
169
MALE
174*
95%*
81
160
82
96%
79
172
FEMALE MIGRANT NOT MIGRANT
0
―
0
―
168
95%
160
166
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. *The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion.
13 of 15
ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE-LEVEL SCIENCE RESULTS FOR ACCOUNTABILITY
ALL ACCOUNTABILITY GROUPS MADE AYP: YES GROUP
ALL STUDENTS
MADE AYP
TESTED 80%
STUDENTS ENROLLE PERCENT OF ENROL PI >= EAMO OR PRO TESTED STUDENTS D DURING THE TEST LED STUDENTS WIT GRESS TARGET ENROLLED ON BEDS ADMINISTRATION P H VALID TEST SCOR DAY ERIOD ES
PI
EAMO
PROGRESS TARGET
YES
YES
63
100%
YES
63
200
175
175
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
―
―
0
―
―
0
―
―
―
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
―
―
0
―
―
0
―
―
―
HISPANIC OR LATINO
―
―
11
―
―
11
―
―
―
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
―
―
0
―
―
0
―
―
―
WHITE
YES
YES
48
100%
YES
48
200
180
180
MULTIRACIAL
―
―
4
―
―
4
―
―
―
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
―
―
5
―
―
5
―
―
―
LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENT
―
―
0
―
―
0
―
―
―
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
―
―
4
―
―
4
―
―
―
RESULTS FOR THE FOLLOWING GROUPS ARE NOT USED TO DETERMINE AYP. GROUP
STUDENTS ENROLLED DURING THE TEST ADM PERCENT OF ENROLLED STUDENTS WITH VAL TESTED STUDENTS ENROLLED ON BEDS DAY INISTRATION PERIOD ID TEST SCORES
PI
NOT AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
63
100%
63
200
NOT BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
63
100%
63
200
NOT HISPANIC OR LATINO
52
100%
52
200
NOT ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PA…
63
100%
63
200
NOT WHITE
15
―
15
―
NOT MULTIRACIAL
59
100%
59
200
GENERAL EDUCATION
58
100%
58
200
ENGLISH PROFICIENT
63
100%
63
200
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
59
100%
59
200
MALE
31
―
31
200
FEMALE
32
―
32
200
MIGRANT
0
―
0
―
NOT MIGRANT
63
100%
63
200
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Progress Target data are suppressed.
14 of 15
UNWEIGHTED COMBINED ELA AND MATH PIS GROUP
ELEMENTARY/ MIDDLE-LEVEL ELA PI
ELEMENTARY/ MIDDLE-LEVEL MATH PI
SECONDARY-LEVEL ELA PI
SECONDARY-LEVEL MATH PI
UNWEIGHTED COMBINED PI
156
166
―
―
161
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
―
―
―
―
0
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
―
―
―
―
0
HISPANIC OR LATINO
―
―
―
―
0
ALL STUDENTS
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
―
―
―
―
0
156
164
―
―
160
MULTIRACIAL
―
―
―
―
0
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
―
―
―
―
0
LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENT
―
―
―
―
0
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
―
―
―
―
0
WHITE
― There were not enough students to determine a Performance Index.
© COPYRIGHT NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. THIS DOCUMENT WAS CREATED ON: NOVEMBER 17, 2016, 8:48 AM EST
15 of 15
