sample presentation for csis
Defense Contract Spending and the Industrial Base, 2000-2013 Project Director: David Berteau Lead Researchers: Jesse Ellman & Gregory Sanders Co-Researcher: Rhys McCormick October 16, 2014 National Security Program on Industry and Resources Center for Strategic & International Studies 202-775-3183 www.csis.org/nspir
The Budget Control Act Caps and the 2015 Budget
FY 2015
$650
OCO placeholder in PB15
Current $ billions
FY15 OCO request: $58.6B $600
$550
Base + OCO PB15 Base Budget BCA Caps
President’s $26B “Opportunity, Growth and Security Initiative”
$500
$450 2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Fiscal Year www.csis.org |
2
Department of Defense Budget, 2001-2019 $800 $700
OCO Budget PB15 Above BCA
Constant 2015 $ billions
$600 $500
BCA Capped Budget
$400 $300 $200 $100
Base Budget $0 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Sources: Department of Defense, National Defense Budget Estimates for FY 2013 (Green Book), Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller), March 2012; Department of Defense, National Defense Budget Estimates for FY 2012 (Green Book), Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller), March 2011.
www.csis.org |
3
Overall Defense Contract Trends
www.csis.org |
4
DoD Contract Obligations by Component, 2000-2013
csis.org\nspir | 5
DoD Contract Obligations by Competition, 2000-2013
csis.org\nspir | 6
DoD Contract Obligations by Contract Size, 2000-2013
csis.org\nspir | 7
Defense Contract Obligations by Platform, 2000-2013
csis.org\nspir | 8
Defense Contract Trends Under Sequestration
csis.org\nspir | 9
DoD Contract Obligations In Context, 2000-2013
csis.org\nspir | 10
DoD Contract Obligations by Component, 2000-2013
csis.org\nspir | 11
DoD Contract Obligations by Area, 2000-2013
csis.org\nspir | 12
DoD R&D Contract Obligations by Component, 2008-2013
csis.org\nspir | 13
DoD Contract Obligations by Vendor Size, 2000-2013
csis.org\nspir | 14
DoD Contract Obligations by Pricing Mechanism, 2000-2013
csis.org\nspir | 15
DoD Contract Obligations by Contract Vehicle, 2000-2013
csis.org\nspir | 16
Top 20 DoD Vendors, 2003 & 2013 Rank
Top 20 Contractors in 2003
Total for Top 20
28,202 22,462 14,241 10,556 10,167 85,628 5,663 5,434 5,180 3,790 3,590 3,578 3,520 3,017 2,236 1,947 1,842 1,691 1,567 1,548 1,528 131,760
Total for all industry
270,957
1 2 3 4 5
Lockheed Martin Boeing Northrop Grumman General Dynamics Raytheon
Obligations in 2013 Millions
Subtotal for Top 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
United Technologies Halliburton Stewart & Stevenson L3 Communications SAIC General Electric BAE Systems Humana Health Net Computer Sciences Corp. ITT URS Dyncorp Honeywell TriWest Healthcare
2002 Rank
Top 20 Contractors in 2013
1 2 3 5 4 6 38 39 23 7 12 11 13 9 17 18 21 15 14 22
Obligations in 2013 Millions
Lockheed Martin Boeing Raytheon General Dynamics Northrop Grumman L3 Communications Huntington Ingalls United Technologies BAE Systems SAIC Humana Dyncorp International Health Net ITT Bechtel Textron General Electric General Atomics Bell-Boeing Joint Project Office* Fluor
36,972 19,898 12,770 11,967 9,859 91,465 5,492 5,481 5,339 4,961 4,331 3,460 3,006 2,908 2,871 2,758 2,656 2,231 2,125 2,096 2,094 143,272 307,974
csis.org\nspir | 17
2012 Rank 1 2 3 4 5 7 9 6 8 10 11 17 13 27 20 25 22 23 14 30
DoD Contract Obligations by Appropriations Account, 2012 & 2013
csis.org\nspir | 18
Additional Defense Competition Data
csis.org\nspir | 19
Contract Obligations Awarded After Effective Competition (2+ Offers), by Component, 2000-2013
csis.org\nspir | 20
Contract Obligations Awarded After Effective Competition (2+ Offers), by Area, 2000-2013
csis.org\nspir | 21
Army Contract Obligations Awarded After Effective Competition (2+ Offers), by Area, 2000-2013
csis.org\nspir | 22
Navy Contract Obligations Awarded After Effective Competition (2+ Offers), by Area, 2000-2013
csis.org\nspir | 23
Air Force Contract Obligations Awarded After Effective Competition (2+ Offers), by Area, 2000-2013
csis.org\nspir | 24
Methodology •
The Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) was the primary source for this report.
•
Federal regulations only require that all unclassified prime contracts worth $3,000 and above be reported to FPDS.
•
FPDS data are constantly being updated, including those for back years. As a consequence, the dollar totals for a given year can vary between reports.
•
Contract classifications sometimes differ between FPDS and individual companies, resulting in some contracts that a company considers as services being labeled as products by FPDS and vice versa.
•
OCO and supplementals are not separately classified in FPDS.
•
All dollar figures are in constant 2013 dollars
•
Additional charts (with breakdowns by DoD component and by Products/Services/R&D), along with full data tables, are available online at http://www.csis.org/NSPIR/DoD
csis.org\nspir | 25
Questions? [email protected]
csis.org\nspir | 26
The Budget Control Act Caps and the 2015 Budget
FY 2015
$650
OCO placeholder in PB15
Current $ billions
FY15 OCO request: $58.6B $600
$550
Base + OCO PB15 Base Budget BCA Caps
President’s $26B “Opportunity, Growth and Security Initiative”
$500
$450 2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Fiscal Year www.csis.org |
2
Department of Defense Budget, 2001-2019 $800 $700
OCO Budget PB15 Above BCA
Constant 2015 $ billions
$600 $500
BCA Capped Budget
$400 $300 $200 $100
Base Budget $0 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Sources: Department of Defense, National Defense Budget Estimates for FY 2013 (Green Book), Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller), March 2012; Department of Defense, National Defense Budget Estimates for FY 2012 (Green Book), Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller), March 2011.
www.csis.org |
3
Overall Defense Contract Trends
www.csis.org |
4
DoD Contract Obligations by Component, 2000-2013
csis.org\nspir | 5
DoD Contract Obligations by Competition, 2000-2013
csis.org\nspir | 6
DoD Contract Obligations by Contract Size, 2000-2013
csis.org\nspir | 7
Defense Contract Obligations by Platform, 2000-2013
csis.org\nspir | 8
Defense Contract Trends Under Sequestration
csis.org\nspir | 9
DoD Contract Obligations In Context, 2000-2013
csis.org\nspir | 10
DoD Contract Obligations by Component, 2000-2013
csis.org\nspir | 11
DoD Contract Obligations by Area, 2000-2013
csis.org\nspir | 12
DoD R&D Contract Obligations by Component, 2008-2013
csis.org\nspir | 13
DoD Contract Obligations by Vendor Size, 2000-2013
csis.org\nspir | 14
DoD Contract Obligations by Pricing Mechanism, 2000-2013
csis.org\nspir | 15
DoD Contract Obligations by Contract Vehicle, 2000-2013
csis.org\nspir | 16
Top 20 DoD Vendors, 2003 & 2013 Rank
Top 20 Contractors in 2003
Total for Top 20
28,202 22,462 14,241 10,556 10,167 85,628 5,663 5,434 5,180 3,790 3,590 3,578 3,520 3,017 2,236 1,947 1,842 1,691 1,567 1,548 1,528 131,760
Total for all industry
270,957
1 2 3 4 5
Lockheed Martin Boeing Northrop Grumman General Dynamics Raytheon
Obligations in 2013 Millions
Subtotal for Top 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
United Technologies Halliburton Stewart & Stevenson L3 Communications SAIC General Electric BAE Systems Humana Health Net Computer Sciences Corp. ITT URS Dyncorp Honeywell TriWest Healthcare
2002 Rank
Top 20 Contractors in 2013
1 2 3 5 4 6 38 39 23 7 12 11 13 9 17 18 21 15 14 22
Obligations in 2013 Millions
Lockheed Martin Boeing Raytheon General Dynamics Northrop Grumman L3 Communications Huntington Ingalls United Technologies BAE Systems SAIC Humana Dyncorp International Health Net ITT Bechtel Textron General Electric General Atomics Bell-Boeing Joint Project Office* Fluor
36,972 19,898 12,770 11,967 9,859 91,465 5,492 5,481 5,339 4,961 4,331 3,460 3,006 2,908 2,871 2,758 2,656 2,231 2,125 2,096 2,094 143,272 307,974
csis.org\nspir | 17
2012 Rank 1 2 3 4 5 7 9 6 8 10 11 17 13 27 20 25 22 23 14 30
DoD Contract Obligations by Appropriations Account, 2012 & 2013
csis.org\nspir | 18
Additional Defense Competition Data
csis.org\nspir | 19
Contract Obligations Awarded After Effective Competition (2+ Offers), by Component, 2000-2013
csis.org\nspir | 20
Contract Obligations Awarded After Effective Competition (2+ Offers), by Area, 2000-2013
csis.org\nspir | 21
Army Contract Obligations Awarded After Effective Competition (2+ Offers), by Area, 2000-2013
csis.org\nspir | 22
Navy Contract Obligations Awarded After Effective Competition (2+ Offers), by Area, 2000-2013
csis.org\nspir | 23
Air Force Contract Obligations Awarded After Effective Competition (2+ Offers), by Area, 2000-2013
csis.org\nspir | 24
Methodology •
The Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) was the primary source for this report.
•
Federal regulations only require that all unclassified prime contracts worth $3,000 and above be reported to FPDS.
•
FPDS data are constantly being updated, including those for back years. As a consequence, the dollar totals for a given year can vary between reports.
•
Contract classifications sometimes differ between FPDS and individual companies, resulting in some contracts that a company considers as services being labeled as products by FPDS and vice versa.
•
OCO and supplementals are not separately classified in FPDS.
•
All dollar figures are in constant 2013 dollars
•
Additional charts (with breakdowns by DoD component and by Products/Services/R&D), along with full data tables, are available online at http://www.csis.org/NSPIR/DoD
csis.org\nspir | 25
Questions? [email protected]
csis.org\nspir | 26
